Availability and consumption of food by common eiders wintering in the Gulf of St. Lawrence: evidence of prey depletion
To quantify the influence of common eiders (Somateria mollissima) on their food supply in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, eastern Canada, we measured prey availability and patch utilization during two consecutive winters. In this region, eiders fed predominantly near submerged reefs where large population...
| Published in: | Canadian Journal of Zoology |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Canadian Science Publishing
1996
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z96-005 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z96-005 |
| Summary: | To quantify the influence of common eiders (Somateria mollissima) on their food supply in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, eastern Canada, we measured prey availability and patch utilization during two consecutive winters. In this region, eiders fed predominantly near submerged reefs where large populations of blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) and green sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachienensis) were present. Density and biomass of mussels and urchins were estimated for two reefs at the beginning of the winter of 1985 – 1986 using SCUBA and quadrat sampling. Prey selection was assessed by comparing the size of prey from stomach contents of shot eiders with that of prey found in the habitat. Patch use was quantified from elevated blinds by regularly counting eiders from December to April. Mussels in the habitat were small (mean length 6.5 mm) and formed dense beds (mean density 25 398 individuals/m 2 ), whereas urchins were large (mean diameter 35 mm) and occurred at lower densities (114 individuals/m 2 ). However, the average biomass for these two prey species was similar, 2.8 and 3.1 kg wet mass/m 2 for mussels and urchins, respectively. The mussels eaten by common eiders tended to be larger than the average size of those available. In contrast, urchins eaten were smaller than the average size present in the habitat. Depending on the reef, consumption of food by eiders ranged from 48 to 69% of the biomass for eiders feeding on mussels and from 3 to 6% of the biomass for urchins. We compared these estimates with those from similar studies and concluded that eiders substantially deplete mussel beds in winter, which in turn seems to affect their distribution. |
|---|