Habitat separation by sympatric forest grouse in Fennoscandia in relation to boreal forest succession

Sympatric forest grouse in intensively managed conifer-dominated forests of the southern boreal zone in Sweden occupied different forest successional stages. Black grouse (Tetrao tetrix) selected forest stands 0 – 20 years old, hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) selected those 20 – 50 years old, and cape...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Zoology
Main Authors: Swenson, Jon E., Angelstam, Per
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 1993
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z93-180
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z93-180
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z93-180
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z93-180 2024-09-15T18:05:58+00:00 Habitat separation by sympatric forest grouse in Fennoscandia in relation to boreal forest succession Swenson, Jon E. Angelstam, Per 1993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z93-180 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z93-180 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Zoology volume 71, issue 7, page 1303-1310 ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283 journal-article 1993 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/z93-180 2024-08-29T04:08:48Z Sympatric forest grouse in intensively managed conifer-dominated forests of the southern boreal zone in Sweden occupied different forest successional stages. Black grouse (Tetrao tetrix) selected forest stands 0 – 20 years old, hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) selected those 20 – 50 years old, and capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) selected those ≥90 years old. Moreover, hazel grouse also selected stands with 1 – 10% deciduous trees, whereas capercaillie selected stands with no deciduous trees. The relative numbers of each grouse species were similar in two areas of intensively managed industrial forest, but differed in an area where forestry was less intensive and where forests had old-growth characteristics, i.e., they were old and multi-layered. Black grouse dominated in the intensively managed areas, whereas hazel grouse dominated in the less intensively managed area. We suggest that under natural conditions, black grouse inhabited the early-successional stages of forest following burns, hazel grouse inhabited the next, denser, successional stage and also old-growth spruce-dominated forests in fire refugia, and capercaillie inhabited stands of open, old, pine-dominated forest maintained by forest fire. The black grouse appears to be preadapted to the modern system of clearcut forest management. However, this system is clearly detrimental to the hazel grouse and capercaillie. To maintain all three species in a managed landscape, forest managers must strive to mimic more closely the natural variation in types and sizes of forest stands. Article in Journal/Newspaper Fennoscandia Canadian Science Publishing Canadian Journal of Zoology 71 7 1303 1310
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
description Sympatric forest grouse in intensively managed conifer-dominated forests of the southern boreal zone in Sweden occupied different forest successional stages. Black grouse (Tetrao tetrix) selected forest stands 0 – 20 years old, hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) selected those 20 – 50 years old, and capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) selected those ≥90 years old. Moreover, hazel grouse also selected stands with 1 – 10% deciduous trees, whereas capercaillie selected stands with no deciduous trees. The relative numbers of each grouse species were similar in two areas of intensively managed industrial forest, but differed in an area where forestry was less intensive and where forests had old-growth characteristics, i.e., they were old and multi-layered. Black grouse dominated in the intensively managed areas, whereas hazel grouse dominated in the less intensively managed area. We suggest that under natural conditions, black grouse inhabited the early-successional stages of forest following burns, hazel grouse inhabited the next, denser, successional stage and also old-growth spruce-dominated forests in fire refugia, and capercaillie inhabited stands of open, old, pine-dominated forest maintained by forest fire. The black grouse appears to be preadapted to the modern system of clearcut forest management. However, this system is clearly detrimental to the hazel grouse and capercaillie. To maintain all three species in a managed landscape, forest managers must strive to mimic more closely the natural variation in types and sizes of forest stands.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Swenson, Jon E.
Angelstam, Per
spellingShingle Swenson, Jon E.
Angelstam, Per
Habitat separation by sympatric forest grouse in Fennoscandia in relation to boreal forest succession
author_facet Swenson, Jon E.
Angelstam, Per
author_sort Swenson, Jon E.
title Habitat separation by sympatric forest grouse in Fennoscandia in relation to boreal forest succession
title_short Habitat separation by sympatric forest grouse in Fennoscandia in relation to boreal forest succession
title_full Habitat separation by sympatric forest grouse in Fennoscandia in relation to boreal forest succession
title_fullStr Habitat separation by sympatric forest grouse in Fennoscandia in relation to boreal forest succession
title_full_unstemmed Habitat separation by sympatric forest grouse in Fennoscandia in relation to boreal forest succession
title_sort habitat separation by sympatric forest grouse in fennoscandia in relation to boreal forest succession
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 1993
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z93-180
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z93-180
genre Fennoscandia
genre_facet Fennoscandia
op_source Canadian Journal of Zoology
volume 71, issue 7, page 1303-1310
ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/z93-180
container_title Canadian Journal of Zoology
container_volume 71
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1303
op_container_end_page 1310
_version_ 1810443469542391808