Effects of ungulate availability on wolf reproductive potential in Alaska

We compared wolf (Canis lupus) reproductive data for March and April, when ungulate biomass per wolf was high, moderate, and low. The percentage of reproductively active adult females was significantly lower (66% compared with ≥96%, P < 0.001) when ungulate biomass per wolf was low versus moderat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Zoology
Main Authors: Boertje, R. D., Stephenson, R. O.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 1992
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z92-328
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z92-328
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z92-328
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z92-328 2024-05-12T08:02:12+00:00 Effects of ungulate availability on wolf reproductive potential in Alaska Boertje, R. D. Stephenson, R. O. 1992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z92-328 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z92-328 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Zoology volume 70, issue 12, page 2441-2443 ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283 Animal Science and Zoology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 1992 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/z92-328 2024-04-18T06:54:53Z We compared wolf (Canis lupus) reproductive data for March and April, when ungulate biomass per wolf was high, moderate, and low. The percentage of reproductively active adult females was significantly lower (66% compared with ≥96%, P < 0.001) when ungulate biomass per wolf was low versus moderate or high. Reproductively inactive adult females had significantly less subcutaneous fat (P < 0.01) than reproductively active females when ungulate biomass per wolf was relatively abundant. Average litter size, estimated by counting blastocysts or fetuses, declined significantly (P < 0.001), from 6.9 to 4.6, as ungulate biomass per wolf declined. We conclude that wolf productivity declines as prey availability per wolf declines. However, only when ungulate biomass per wolf declined below levels previously reported in the literature did we observe significant declines in reproductive potential. Ungulate biomass per wolf was low because of large, rapid declines in ungulates and lesser declines in wolves. We recognize that functional relationships, e.g., prey vulnerability and feeding dominance, can influence wolf productivity independently of ungulate biomass per wolf. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Alaska Canadian Science Publishing Canadian Journal of Zoology 70 12 2441 2443
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Boertje, R. D.
Stephenson, R. O.
Effects of ungulate availability on wolf reproductive potential in Alaska
topic_facet Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description We compared wolf (Canis lupus) reproductive data for March and April, when ungulate biomass per wolf was high, moderate, and low. The percentage of reproductively active adult females was significantly lower (66% compared with ≥96%, P < 0.001) when ungulate biomass per wolf was low versus moderate or high. Reproductively inactive adult females had significantly less subcutaneous fat (P < 0.01) than reproductively active females when ungulate biomass per wolf was relatively abundant. Average litter size, estimated by counting blastocysts or fetuses, declined significantly (P < 0.001), from 6.9 to 4.6, as ungulate biomass per wolf declined. We conclude that wolf productivity declines as prey availability per wolf declines. However, only when ungulate biomass per wolf declined below levels previously reported in the literature did we observe significant declines in reproductive potential. Ungulate biomass per wolf was low because of large, rapid declines in ungulates and lesser declines in wolves. We recognize that functional relationships, e.g., prey vulnerability and feeding dominance, can influence wolf productivity independently of ungulate biomass per wolf.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Boertje, R. D.
Stephenson, R. O.
author_facet Boertje, R. D.
Stephenson, R. O.
author_sort Boertje, R. D.
title Effects of ungulate availability on wolf reproductive potential in Alaska
title_short Effects of ungulate availability on wolf reproductive potential in Alaska
title_full Effects of ungulate availability on wolf reproductive potential in Alaska
title_fullStr Effects of ungulate availability on wolf reproductive potential in Alaska
title_full_unstemmed Effects of ungulate availability on wolf reproductive potential in Alaska
title_sort effects of ungulate availability on wolf reproductive potential in alaska
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 1992
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z92-328
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z92-328
genre Canis lupus
Alaska
genre_facet Canis lupus
Alaska
op_source Canadian Journal of Zoology
volume 70, issue 12, page 2441-2443
ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/z92-328
container_title Canadian Journal of Zoology
container_volume 70
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2441
op_container_end_page 2443
_version_ 1798844299066998784