Intra- and inter-specific dominance relationships among arctic and snowshoe hares

The geographic ranges of arctic and snowshoe hares (Lepus arcticus and L. americanus) rarely overlap. In Newfoundland and elsewhere in North America, arctic hares occupy treeless barrens or tundra, whereas snowshoe hares inhabit forest. We explored the hypothesis that such allopatry reflects interfe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Zoology
Main Authors: Fitzgerald, Shannon M., Keith, Lloyd B.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 1990
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z90-067
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z90-067
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z90-067
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z90-067 2023-12-17T10:24:08+01:00 Intra- and inter-specific dominance relationships among arctic and snowshoe hares Fitzgerald, Shannon M. Keith, Lloyd B. 1990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z90-067 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z90-067 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Zoology volume 68, issue 3, page 457-464 ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283 Animal Science and Zoology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 1990 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/z90-067 2023-11-19T13:39:11Z The geographic ranges of arctic and snowshoe hares (Lepus arcticus and L. americanus) rarely overlap. In Newfoundland and elsewhere in North America, arctic hares occupy treeless barrens or tundra, whereas snowshoe hares inhabit forest. We explored the hypothesis that such allopatry reflects interference competition, an agonistic interaction in which snowshoe hares are behaviourally dominant. To assess both inter- and intra-specific dominance, we conducted a series of dyadic trials in outdoor pens and also observed interactions of free-ranging individuals. Five testable predictions were inferred, a priori, from competition theory and previous leporid studies: (i) heavier individuals are dominant, (ii) adults dominate juveniles, (iii) females dominate males when both are in breeding condition, (iv) males dominate females when neither are in breeding condition, and (v) adults in breeding condition dominate those that are not. With snowshoe hares, tests for predictions i and ii were inconclusive, and iii was probably verified (P = 0.03). With arctic hares, test results were inconclusive for i, verified for ii (P < 0.01), and rejected for iii and iv, dominance being unrelated to sex or breeding condition. Prediction v could not be tested intraspecifically, but arctic hares dominated snowshoe hares in 84 of 85 dyads, including those where snowshoes weighed more, or were in breeding condition and arctic hares were not. It is, therefore, highly unlikely that interference competition with snowshoe hares is responsible for the current restriction of arctic hares to barrens and tundra. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Lepus arcticus Newfoundland Tundra Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref) Arctic Canadian Journal of Zoology 68 3 457 464
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Fitzgerald, Shannon M.
Keith, Lloyd B.
Intra- and inter-specific dominance relationships among arctic and snowshoe hares
topic_facet Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description The geographic ranges of arctic and snowshoe hares (Lepus arcticus and L. americanus) rarely overlap. In Newfoundland and elsewhere in North America, arctic hares occupy treeless barrens or tundra, whereas snowshoe hares inhabit forest. We explored the hypothesis that such allopatry reflects interference competition, an agonistic interaction in which snowshoe hares are behaviourally dominant. To assess both inter- and intra-specific dominance, we conducted a series of dyadic trials in outdoor pens and also observed interactions of free-ranging individuals. Five testable predictions were inferred, a priori, from competition theory and previous leporid studies: (i) heavier individuals are dominant, (ii) adults dominate juveniles, (iii) females dominate males when both are in breeding condition, (iv) males dominate females when neither are in breeding condition, and (v) adults in breeding condition dominate those that are not. With snowshoe hares, tests for predictions i and ii were inconclusive, and iii was probably verified (P = 0.03). With arctic hares, test results were inconclusive for i, verified for ii (P < 0.01), and rejected for iii and iv, dominance being unrelated to sex or breeding condition. Prediction v could not be tested intraspecifically, but arctic hares dominated snowshoe hares in 84 of 85 dyads, including those where snowshoes weighed more, or were in breeding condition and arctic hares were not. It is, therefore, highly unlikely that interference competition with snowshoe hares is responsible for the current restriction of arctic hares to barrens and tundra.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Fitzgerald, Shannon M.
Keith, Lloyd B.
author_facet Fitzgerald, Shannon M.
Keith, Lloyd B.
author_sort Fitzgerald, Shannon M.
title Intra- and inter-specific dominance relationships among arctic and snowshoe hares
title_short Intra- and inter-specific dominance relationships among arctic and snowshoe hares
title_full Intra- and inter-specific dominance relationships among arctic and snowshoe hares
title_fullStr Intra- and inter-specific dominance relationships among arctic and snowshoe hares
title_full_unstemmed Intra- and inter-specific dominance relationships among arctic and snowshoe hares
title_sort intra- and inter-specific dominance relationships among arctic and snowshoe hares
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 1990
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z90-067
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z90-067
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Lepus arcticus
Newfoundland
Tundra
genre_facet Arctic
Lepus arcticus
Newfoundland
Tundra
op_source Canadian Journal of Zoology
volume 68, issue 3, page 457-464
ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/z90-067
container_title Canadian Journal of Zoology
container_volume 68
container_issue 3
container_start_page 457
op_container_end_page 464
_version_ 1785563228611280896