Dynamics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. I. Density and age–sex composition

The characteristics of a grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) population in southeastern British Columbia were studied between 1979 and 1986, a period of timber harvest, gas exploration, and outdoor recreation, including grizzly hunting. I investigated the hypothesis that collectively these activities were d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Zoology
Main Author: McLellan, Bruce N.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 1989
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z89-264
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z89-264
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z89-264
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z89-264 2023-12-17T10:51:19+01:00 Dynamics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. I. Density and age–sex composition McLellan, Bruce N. 1989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z89-264 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z89-264 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Zoology volume 67, issue 8, page 1856-1860 ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283 Animal Science and Zoology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 1989 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/z89-264 2023-11-19T13:39:13Z The characteristics of a grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) population in southeastern British Columbia were studied between 1979 and 1986, a period of timber harvest, gas exploration, and outdoor recreation, including grizzly hunting. I investigated the hypothesis that collectively these activities were detrimental to the grizzly population. I predicted a low density of bears compared with other interior populations and (or) a negative rate of increase. The sex ratio of cubs and yearlings captured was 50:50 and they represented 21.5 and 17.5% of the population, respectively. Although more adult males than adult females were captured, I estimated that there were more adult females than males in the population. I used two methods of population estimation and assumed saturation trapping : one method was based on home range characteristics and the other on the proportion of aerial locations in the study area. The average estimated bear density was 6.4/100 km 2 , which was high for an interior population, and increased from approximately 5.7/100 km 2 in 1981 to 8.0/100 km 2 in 1986, for an average annual observed rate of increase of r = 0.07. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ursus arctos Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref) Canadian Journal of Zoology 67 8 1856 1860
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
McLellan, Bruce N.
Dynamics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. I. Density and age–sex composition
topic_facet Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description The characteristics of a grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) population in southeastern British Columbia were studied between 1979 and 1986, a period of timber harvest, gas exploration, and outdoor recreation, including grizzly hunting. I investigated the hypothesis that collectively these activities were detrimental to the grizzly population. I predicted a low density of bears compared with other interior populations and (or) a negative rate of increase. The sex ratio of cubs and yearlings captured was 50:50 and they represented 21.5 and 17.5% of the population, respectively. Although more adult males than adult females were captured, I estimated that there were more adult females than males in the population. I used two methods of population estimation and assumed saturation trapping : one method was based on home range characteristics and the other on the proportion of aerial locations in the study area. The average estimated bear density was 6.4/100 km 2 , which was high for an interior population, and increased from approximately 5.7/100 km 2 in 1981 to 8.0/100 km 2 in 1986, for an average annual observed rate of increase of r = 0.07.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author McLellan, Bruce N.
author_facet McLellan, Bruce N.
author_sort McLellan, Bruce N.
title Dynamics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. I. Density and age–sex composition
title_short Dynamics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. I. Density and age–sex composition
title_full Dynamics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. I. Density and age–sex composition
title_fullStr Dynamics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. I. Density and age–sex composition
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. I. Density and age–sex composition
title_sort dynamics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. i. density and age–sex composition
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 1989
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z89-264
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z89-264
genre Ursus arctos
genre_facet Ursus arctos
op_source Canadian Journal of Zoology
volume 67, issue 8, page 1856-1860
ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/z89-264
container_title Canadian Journal of Zoology
container_volume 67
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1856
op_container_end_page 1860
_version_ 1785576548880875520