Predator–prey relationships and predation rates for crustacean zooplankters from some lakes in western Canada

Experimental studies on Diaptoimus shoshone, D. arcticus, D. nevadensis, Cyclops bicuspidatus thomasi, C. vernalis, and Branckinecta gigas show that these predatory species can capture and eat many prey species of various sizes. B. gigas probably combines raptorial with filter feeding and can eat 15...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Zoology
Main Author: Anderson, R. Stewart
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 1970
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z70-212
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z70-212
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z70-212
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z70-212 2024-03-03T08:49:24+00:00 Predator–prey relationships and predation rates for crustacean zooplankters from some lakes in western Canada Anderson, R. Stewart 1970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z70-212 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z70-212 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Zoology volume 48, issue 6, page 1229-1240 ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283 Animal Science and Zoology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 1970 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/z70-212 2024-02-07T10:53:39Z Experimental studies on Diaptoimus shoshone, D. arcticus, D. nevadensis, Cyclops bicuspidatus thomasi, C. vernalis, and Branckinecta gigas show that these predatory species can capture and eat many prey species of various sizes. B. gigas probably combines raptorial with filter feeding and can eat 150 or more smaller crustaceans per day. Adult D. shoshone, D. arcticus, and D. nevadensis eat up to 12 or more cyclopoids or diaptomids per day. Rotifers are also preferred prey. Predation rates are inversely proportional to prey size. Cannibalism probably causes the uniformity in body size and instar of predaceous diaptomids in some populations, C. vernalis and C. b. thomasi can eat six or more prey animals daily, depending on the size of the prey. Predaceous diaptomids and cyclopoids will eat the same prey species at rates which are influenced more by hunger than by abundance of prey. Furthermore, each species is a potential predator on the other, where the role of predator or prey is determined by the relative size or instar of the two groups. Hence, codominance of the zooplankton by predaceous diaptomid and cyclopoid species is unlikely. Article in Journal/Newspaper Zooplankton Canadian Science Publishing Canada Canadian Journal of Zoology 48 6 1229 1240
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Anderson, R. Stewart
Predator–prey relationships and predation rates for crustacean zooplankters from some lakes in western Canada
topic_facet Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description Experimental studies on Diaptoimus shoshone, D. arcticus, D. nevadensis, Cyclops bicuspidatus thomasi, C. vernalis, and Branckinecta gigas show that these predatory species can capture and eat many prey species of various sizes. B. gigas probably combines raptorial with filter feeding and can eat 150 or more smaller crustaceans per day. Adult D. shoshone, D. arcticus, and D. nevadensis eat up to 12 or more cyclopoids or diaptomids per day. Rotifers are also preferred prey. Predation rates are inversely proportional to prey size. Cannibalism probably causes the uniformity in body size and instar of predaceous diaptomids in some populations, C. vernalis and C. b. thomasi can eat six or more prey animals daily, depending on the size of the prey. Predaceous diaptomids and cyclopoids will eat the same prey species at rates which are influenced more by hunger than by abundance of prey. Furthermore, each species is a potential predator on the other, where the role of predator or prey is determined by the relative size or instar of the two groups. Hence, codominance of the zooplankton by predaceous diaptomid and cyclopoid species is unlikely.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Anderson, R. Stewart
author_facet Anderson, R. Stewart
author_sort Anderson, R. Stewart
title Predator–prey relationships and predation rates for crustacean zooplankters from some lakes in western Canada
title_short Predator–prey relationships and predation rates for crustacean zooplankters from some lakes in western Canada
title_full Predator–prey relationships and predation rates for crustacean zooplankters from some lakes in western Canada
title_fullStr Predator–prey relationships and predation rates for crustacean zooplankters from some lakes in western Canada
title_full_unstemmed Predator–prey relationships and predation rates for crustacean zooplankters from some lakes in western Canada
title_sort predator–prey relationships and predation rates for crustacean zooplankters from some lakes in western canada
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 1970
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z70-212
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z70-212
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Zooplankton
genre_facet Zooplankton
op_source Canadian Journal of Zoology
volume 48, issue 6, page 1229-1240
ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/z70-212
container_title Canadian Journal of Zoology
container_volume 48
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1229
op_container_end_page 1240
_version_ 1792506617073238016