Female wolverine ( Gulo gulo) reproduction: reproductive costs and winter food availability
An individual has only a given amount of resources, and therefore an increase in one demographic trait results in a trade-off that necessitates a decrease in a different demographic trait. In general, the main factor determining an individual mammal's reproductive investment is food supply. Thi...
Published in: | Canadian Journal of Zoology |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Canadian Science Publishing
2005
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z05-143 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z05-143 |
_version_ | 1821533966440595456 |
---|---|
author | Persson, Jens |
author_facet | Persson, Jens |
author_sort | Persson, Jens |
collection | Canadian Science Publishing |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1453 |
container_title | Canadian Journal of Zoology |
container_volume | 83 |
description | An individual has only a given amount of resources, and therefore an increase in one demographic trait results in a trade-off that necessitates a decrease in a different demographic trait. In general, the main factor determining an individual mammal's reproductive investment is food supply. This study addresses how female wolverine (Gulo gulo (L., 1758)) reproduction is limited. I tested two complementary hypotheses: (1) current reproduction is affected by the costs of reproduction in the preceding year and (2) current reproduction is affected by food availability in the current winter. I addressed the first hypothesis by comparing reproductive rates of females in relation to their reproductive effort in the preceding year. I experimentally tested the second hypothesis by comparing reproductive rates of food-supplemented females versus non-supplemented females. Reproduction incurred costs on female wolverines that affected future reproduction, and reproductive costs appeared to be related to the duration of parental care. Reproduction was higher for food-supplemented females than for non-supplemented females, even though all food-supplemented females had reproduced the preceding year. This study suggests that reproduction is limited by winter food availability and that additional food can compensate for reproductive costs. Thus, I suggest that female wolverine reproduction is determined by their condition in winter, which is a result of the combined effect of reproductive costs and winter food availability. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Gulo gulo |
genre_facet | Gulo gulo |
id | crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z05-143 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | crcansciencepubl |
op_container_end_page | 1459 |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.1139/z05-143 |
op_rights | http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining |
op_source | Canadian Journal of Zoology volume 83, issue 11, page 1453-1459 ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283 |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | Canadian Science Publishing |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z05-143 2025-01-16T22:15:58+00:00 Female wolverine ( Gulo gulo) reproduction: reproductive costs and winter food availability Persson, Jens 2005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z05-143 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z05-143 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Zoology volume 83, issue 11, page 1453-1459 ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283 journal-article 2005 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/z05-143 2024-08-01T04:10:02Z An individual has only a given amount of resources, and therefore an increase in one demographic trait results in a trade-off that necessitates a decrease in a different demographic trait. In general, the main factor determining an individual mammal's reproductive investment is food supply. This study addresses how female wolverine (Gulo gulo (L., 1758)) reproduction is limited. I tested two complementary hypotheses: (1) current reproduction is affected by the costs of reproduction in the preceding year and (2) current reproduction is affected by food availability in the current winter. I addressed the first hypothesis by comparing reproductive rates of females in relation to their reproductive effort in the preceding year. I experimentally tested the second hypothesis by comparing reproductive rates of food-supplemented females versus non-supplemented females. Reproduction incurred costs on female wolverines that affected future reproduction, and reproductive costs appeared to be related to the duration of parental care. Reproduction was higher for food-supplemented females than for non-supplemented females, even though all food-supplemented females had reproduced the preceding year. This study suggests that reproduction is limited by winter food availability and that additional food can compensate for reproductive costs. Thus, I suggest that female wolverine reproduction is determined by their condition in winter, which is a result of the combined effect of reproductive costs and winter food availability. Article in Journal/Newspaper Gulo gulo Canadian Science Publishing Canadian Journal of Zoology 83 11 1453 1459 |
spellingShingle | Persson, Jens Female wolverine ( Gulo gulo) reproduction: reproductive costs and winter food availability |
title | Female wolverine ( Gulo gulo) reproduction: reproductive costs and winter food availability |
title_full | Female wolverine ( Gulo gulo) reproduction: reproductive costs and winter food availability |
title_fullStr | Female wolverine ( Gulo gulo) reproduction: reproductive costs and winter food availability |
title_full_unstemmed | Female wolverine ( Gulo gulo) reproduction: reproductive costs and winter food availability |
title_short | Female wolverine ( Gulo gulo) reproduction: reproductive costs and winter food availability |
title_sort | female wolverine ( gulo gulo) reproduction: reproductive costs and winter food availability |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z05-143 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z05-143 |