Common vole ( Microtus arvalis) population sex ratio: biases and process variation

Vole population sex ratio varies seasonally. However, population sex ratios have usually been estimated using naïve estimators that do not allow for biases owing to the sex difference in capture probabilities and movement distances (i.e., effective areas sampled). Here we aimed to advance the method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Zoology
Main Authors: Bryja, Josef, Nesvadbová, Jiřina, Heroldová, Marta, Jánová, Eva, Losík, Jan, Trebatická, Lenka, Tkadlec, Emil
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z05-133
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z05-133
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z05-133
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z05-133 2024-09-15T18:02:48+00:00 Common vole ( Microtus arvalis) population sex ratio: biases and process variation Bryja, Josef Nesvadbová, Jiřina Heroldová, Marta Jánová, Eva Losík, Jan Trebatická, Lenka Tkadlec, Emil 2005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z05-133 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z05-133 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Zoology volume 83, issue 11, page 1391-1399 ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283 journal-article 2005 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/z05-133 2024-08-08T04:13:35Z Vole population sex ratio varies seasonally. However, population sex ratios have usually been estimated using naïve estimators that do not allow for biases owing to the sex difference in capture probabilities and movement distances (i.e., effective areas sampled). Here we aimed to advance the methodological approach, recognizing that there are two different classes of contributing mechanisms to the pattern which are best addressed separately: (1) those mechan isms imposing a systematic error (bias) in population estimates and (2) those generating the true process variation. Analyzing 7-year capture–recapture data in the common vole (Microtus arvalis (Pallas, 1778)), we quantified both types of biases and revealed that the bias owing to differential capture rates was often severe and less predictable, whereas that owing to differential effective areas was smaller and overestimated male numbers for most of the year. We demonstrated unambiguously that the unbiased population sex ratio indeed varies seasonally, with the males usually being more numerous over winter and spring. By testing predictions from two mechanistic hypotheses to explain the process variability, we found evidence for both the differential recruitment hypothesis and the differential survival hypothesis. From April–May to August, it was the females that were recruited more to the population and that had higher survival rates than males. We suggest that the seasonal variation in the population sex ratio is not merely a result of biasing mechanisms but an important population property driven by the joint effect of differential recruitment and differential survival between sexes. Article in Journal/Newspaper Common vole Microtus arvalis Canadian Science Publishing Canadian Journal of Zoology 83 11 1391 1399
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
description Vole population sex ratio varies seasonally. However, population sex ratios have usually been estimated using naïve estimators that do not allow for biases owing to the sex difference in capture probabilities and movement distances (i.e., effective areas sampled). Here we aimed to advance the methodological approach, recognizing that there are two different classes of contributing mechanisms to the pattern which are best addressed separately: (1) those mechan isms imposing a systematic error (bias) in population estimates and (2) those generating the true process variation. Analyzing 7-year capture–recapture data in the common vole (Microtus arvalis (Pallas, 1778)), we quantified both types of biases and revealed that the bias owing to differential capture rates was often severe and less predictable, whereas that owing to differential effective areas was smaller and overestimated male numbers for most of the year. We demonstrated unambiguously that the unbiased population sex ratio indeed varies seasonally, with the males usually being more numerous over winter and spring. By testing predictions from two mechanistic hypotheses to explain the process variability, we found evidence for both the differential recruitment hypothesis and the differential survival hypothesis. From April–May to August, it was the females that were recruited more to the population and that had higher survival rates than males. We suggest that the seasonal variation in the population sex ratio is not merely a result of biasing mechanisms but an important population property driven by the joint effect of differential recruitment and differential survival between sexes.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bryja, Josef
Nesvadbová, Jiřina
Heroldová, Marta
Jánová, Eva
Losík, Jan
Trebatická, Lenka
Tkadlec, Emil
spellingShingle Bryja, Josef
Nesvadbová, Jiřina
Heroldová, Marta
Jánová, Eva
Losík, Jan
Trebatická, Lenka
Tkadlec, Emil
Common vole ( Microtus arvalis) population sex ratio: biases and process variation
author_facet Bryja, Josef
Nesvadbová, Jiřina
Heroldová, Marta
Jánová, Eva
Losík, Jan
Trebatická, Lenka
Tkadlec, Emil
author_sort Bryja, Josef
title Common vole ( Microtus arvalis) population sex ratio: biases and process variation
title_short Common vole ( Microtus arvalis) population sex ratio: biases and process variation
title_full Common vole ( Microtus arvalis) population sex ratio: biases and process variation
title_fullStr Common vole ( Microtus arvalis) population sex ratio: biases and process variation
title_full_unstemmed Common vole ( Microtus arvalis) population sex ratio: biases and process variation
title_sort common vole ( microtus arvalis) population sex ratio: biases and process variation
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 2005
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z05-133
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z05-133
genre Common vole
Microtus arvalis
genre_facet Common vole
Microtus arvalis
op_source Canadian Journal of Zoology
volume 83, issue 11, page 1391-1399
ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/z05-133
container_title Canadian Journal of Zoology
container_volume 83
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1391
op_container_end_page 1399
_version_ 1810440212316160000