The importance of prey distribution in habitat use by arctic foxes ( Alopex lagopus)

The use of habitat by reproducing arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus) in relation to prey distribution was examined on the Svalbard archipelago in the Norwegian High Arctic during 1987–1988 and 1997–2000 by means of VHF telemetry. The distribution and abundance of the main prey species of foxes was regist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Zoology
Main Authors: Jepsen, Jane U, Eide, Nina E, Prestrud, Pål, Jacobsen, Linn B
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z02-023
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z02-023
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z02-023
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z02-023 2024-09-15T17:38:26+00:00 The importance of prey distribution in habitat use by arctic foxes ( Alopex lagopus) Jepsen, Jane U Eide, Nina E Prestrud, Pål Jacobsen, Linn B 2002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z02-023 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z02-023 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Zoology volume 80, issue 3, page 418-429 ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283 journal-article 2002 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/z02-023 2024-07-25T04:10:08Z The use of habitat by reproducing arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus) in relation to prey distribution was examined on the Svalbard archipelago in the Norwegian High Arctic during 1987–1988 and 1997–2000 by means of VHF telemetry. The distribution and abundance of the main prey species of foxes was registered in 4 separate periods during summer. The availability of 9 habitat types was estimated on the basis of a classification of a Landsat-5 TM scene. Three resource areas that differed with regard to distribution and availability of prey, vegetation, and terrain were identified within the study area: (1) inland areas with no geese, (2) inland areas with geese present, and (3) coastal areas with bird cliffs. The use of resources by foxes was calculated in the 4 separate periods, as was the average speed of movement (m/h) of foxes and the distance between fox locations and their natal dens. Resource-selection functions (RSFs) calculated for individual animals showed that resource use was nonrandom and similar for foxes that lived within the same resource area. In inland areas in which resource availability was low but fairly stable (area 1), RSFs were simple and in some cases of low significance compared with a no-selection model. In inland areas with highly dynamic resources (area 2), RSFs were complex and resource use differed significantly between periods. In coastal areas (area 3), where resources were plentiful, highly concentrated, and stable, RSFs were of intermediate complexity and resource use differed less between periods. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alopex lagopus Svalbard Canadian Science Publishing Canadian Journal of Zoology 80 3 418 429
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
description The use of habitat by reproducing arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus) in relation to prey distribution was examined on the Svalbard archipelago in the Norwegian High Arctic during 1987–1988 and 1997–2000 by means of VHF telemetry. The distribution and abundance of the main prey species of foxes was registered in 4 separate periods during summer. The availability of 9 habitat types was estimated on the basis of a classification of a Landsat-5 TM scene. Three resource areas that differed with regard to distribution and availability of prey, vegetation, and terrain were identified within the study area: (1) inland areas with no geese, (2) inland areas with geese present, and (3) coastal areas with bird cliffs. The use of resources by foxes was calculated in the 4 separate periods, as was the average speed of movement (m/h) of foxes and the distance between fox locations and their natal dens. Resource-selection functions (RSFs) calculated for individual animals showed that resource use was nonrandom and similar for foxes that lived within the same resource area. In inland areas in which resource availability was low but fairly stable (area 1), RSFs were simple and in some cases of low significance compared with a no-selection model. In inland areas with highly dynamic resources (area 2), RSFs were complex and resource use differed significantly between periods. In coastal areas (area 3), where resources were plentiful, highly concentrated, and stable, RSFs were of intermediate complexity and resource use differed less between periods.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jepsen, Jane U
Eide, Nina E
Prestrud, Pål
Jacobsen, Linn B
spellingShingle Jepsen, Jane U
Eide, Nina E
Prestrud, Pål
Jacobsen, Linn B
The importance of prey distribution in habitat use by arctic foxes ( Alopex lagopus)
author_facet Jepsen, Jane U
Eide, Nina E
Prestrud, Pål
Jacobsen, Linn B
author_sort Jepsen, Jane U
title The importance of prey distribution in habitat use by arctic foxes ( Alopex lagopus)
title_short The importance of prey distribution in habitat use by arctic foxes ( Alopex lagopus)
title_full The importance of prey distribution in habitat use by arctic foxes ( Alopex lagopus)
title_fullStr The importance of prey distribution in habitat use by arctic foxes ( Alopex lagopus)
title_full_unstemmed The importance of prey distribution in habitat use by arctic foxes ( Alopex lagopus)
title_sort importance of prey distribution in habitat use by arctic foxes ( alopex lagopus)
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 2002
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z02-023
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z02-023
genre Alopex lagopus
Svalbard
genre_facet Alopex lagopus
Svalbard
op_source Canadian Journal of Zoology
volume 80, issue 3, page 418-429
ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/z02-023
container_title Canadian Journal of Zoology
container_volume 80
container_issue 3
container_start_page 418
op_container_end_page 429
_version_ 1810473187893313536