Grizzly bear use of open, closed, and restricted forestry roads

We investigated grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) selection of three road types in the northern United States and southern British Columbia from 1986 to 1991. We hypothesized that grizzly bears select against open (public use allowed), restricted (forestry use only), and closed roads (no public use allowe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Main Authors: Wielgus, Robert B, Vernier, Pierre R, Schivatcheva, Tina
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x02-084
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/x02-084
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/x02-084
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/x02-084 2023-12-17T10:51:20+01:00 Grizzly bear use of open, closed, and restricted forestry roads Wielgus, Robert B Vernier, Pierre R Schivatcheva, Tina 2002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x02-084 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/x02-084 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Forest Research volume 32, issue 9, page 1597-1606 ISSN 0045-5067 1208-6037 Ecology Forestry Global and Planetary Change journal-article 2002 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/x02-084 2023-11-19T13:39:32Z We investigated grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) selection of three road types in the northern United States and southern British Columbia from 1986 to 1991. We hypothesized that grizzly bears select against open (public use allowed), restricted (forestry use only), and closed roads (no public use allowed) in that order. We analyzed use of roads for 11 bears (five females and six males) in an area containing open and closed roads and 11 bears (seven females and four males) in an adjacent area containing restricted roads. We used χ 2 and log–linear models to test for selection of habitat type and distance to road categories. Ten of 12 females and 5 of 10 males (15 of 22 bears) selected against (P < 0.05) low-elevation interior cedar-hemlock and for (P < 0.05) high-elevation Englemann spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.) – subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt.). After accounting for habitat, 4 of 5 females and 3 of 6 males (7 of 11 bears) selected against open roads and 3 of 5 females and 0 of 6 males (3 of 11 bears) selected against closed roads. No females (n = 7) or males (n = 4) (0 of 11 bears) selected against restricted roads. Our results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that bears select against open, restricted, and closed roads in that order. Most females and males selected against open roads, most females selected against closed roads, and no bears selected against restricted roads. The type of human activity along roads plays a role in bear responses to roads, and this aspect should be incorporated into future bear-road studies. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ursus arctos Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref) Parry ENVELOPE(-62.417,-62.417,-64.283,-64.283) Nutt ENVELOPE(108.217,108.217,-66.633,-66.633) Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32 9 1597 1606
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic Ecology
Forestry
Global and Planetary Change
spellingShingle Ecology
Forestry
Global and Planetary Change
Wielgus, Robert B
Vernier, Pierre R
Schivatcheva, Tina
Grizzly bear use of open, closed, and restricted forestry roads
topic_facet Ecology
Forestry
Global and Planetary Change
description We investigated grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) selection of three road types in the northern United States and southern British Columbia from 1986 to 1991. We hypothesized that grizzly bears select against open (public use allowed), restricted (forestry use only), and closed roads (no public use allowed) in that order. We analyzed use of roads for 11 bears (five females and six males) in an area containing open and closed roads and 11 bears (seven females and four males) in an adjacent area containing restricted roads. We used χ 2 and log–linear models to test for selection of habitat type and distance to road categories. Ten of 12 females and 5 of 10 males (15 of 22 bears) selected against (P < 0.05) low-elevation interior cedar-hemlock and for (P < 0.05) high-elevation Englemann spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.) – subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt.). After accounting for habitat, 4 of 5 females and 3 of 6 males (7 of 11 bears) selected against open roads and 3 of 5 females and 0 of 6 males (3 of 11 bears) selected against closed roads. No females (n = 7) or males (n = 4) (0 of 11 bears) selected against restricted roads. Our results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that bears select against open, restricted, and closed roads in that order. Most females and males selected against open roads, most females selected against closed roads, and no bears selected against restricted roads. The type of human activity along roads plays a role in bear responses to roads, and this aspect should be incorporated into future bear-road studies.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Wielgus, Robert B
Vernier, Pierre R
Schivatcheva, Tina
author_facet Wielgus, Robert B
Vernier, Pierre R
Schivatcheva, Tina
author_sort Wielgus, Robert B
title Grizzly bear use of open, closed, and restricted forestry roads
title_short Grizzly bear use of open, closed, and restricted forestry roads
title_full Grizzly bear use of open, closed, and restricted forestry roads
title_fullStr Grizzly bear use of open, closed, and restricted forestry roads
title_full_unstemmed Grizzly bear use of open, closed, and restricted forestry roads
title_sort grizzly bear use of open, closed, and restricted forestry roads
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 2002
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x02-084
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/x02-084
long_lat ENVELOPE(-62.417,-62.417,-64.283,-64.283)
ENVELOPE(108.217,108.217,-66.633,-66.633)
geographic Parry
Nutt
geographic_facet Parry
Nutt
genre Ursus arctos
genre_facet Ursus arctos
op_source Canadian Journal of Forest Research
volume 32, issue 9, page 1597-1606
ISSN 0045-5067 1208-6037
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/x02-084
container_title Canadian Journal of Forest Research
container_volume 32
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1597
op_container_end_page 1606
_version_ 1785576570984857600