Creep rates of spray ice

Mars Island, a man-made spray ice island, was constructed in January and February 1986, and was used as a drill platform for petroleum exploration in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. A series of pressuremeter creep tests was run in the spray ice of Mars Island in March 1986. Individual constant-pressure te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Main Authors: Shields, D., Domaschuk, L., Funegard, E.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 1990
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/t90-022
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/t90-022
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/t90-022
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/t90-022 2023-12-17T10:27:56+01:00 Creep rates of spray ice Shields, D. Domaschuk, L. Funegard, E. 1990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/t90-022 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/t90-022 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Geotechnical Journal volume 27, issue 2, page 185-194 ISSN 0008-3674 1208-6010 Civil and Structural Engineering Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology journal-article 1990 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-022 2023-11-19T13:38:47Z Mars Island, a man-made spray ice island, was constructed in January and February 1986, and was used as a drill platform for petroleum exploration in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. A series of pressuremeter creep tests was run in the spray ice of Mars Island in March 1986. Individual constant-pressure tests lasted up to 5 days.It is possible to compare the creep behaviour of the spray ice as interpreted from the pressuremeter tests with the creep behaviour interpreted from the island settlement records. These comparisons are made for both primary and secondary creep on the basis of conventional power law theory. The following points are of particular interest: (1) The primary creep data can be characterized using a simple power law. The exponent of time for spray ice is similar to that for solid polycrystalline ice. The exponent of stress is different for the two kinds of ice. (2) Pressuremeter tests gave secondary creep information that correlates well with the steady-rate settlement of the island. (3) Research into the possible range of primary creep parameters for spray ice is required, given that primary creep accounted for a large portion of the settlement of Mars Island. In particular, the effect of ice density on creep rates mast be resolved. (4) The pressuremeter is potentially an excellent design control device during the manufacture of future spray ice islands. The results of constant-pressure tests of 1–2 days duration could be used to check the design assumptions pertaining to the expected consolidation of the ice mass with time. Key words: spray ice, creep, artificial islands, pressuremeter, settlement. Article in Journal/Newspaper Beaufort Sea Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref) Mars Island ENVELOPE(101.133,101.133,-66.050,-66.050) Canadian Geotechnical Journal 27 2 185 194
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic Civil and Structural Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
spellingShingle Civil and Structural Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Shields, D.
Domaschuk, L.
Funegard, E.
Creep rates of spray ice
topic_facet Civil and Structural Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
description Mars Island, a man-made spray ice island, was constructed in January and February 1986, and was used as a drill platform for petroleum exploration in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. A series of pressuremeter creep tests was run in the spray ice of Mars Island in March 1986. Individual constant-pressure tests lasted up to 5 days.It is possible to compare the creep behaviour of the spray ice as interpreted from the pressuremeter tests with the creep behaviour interpreted from the island settlement records. These comparisons are made for both primary and secondary creep on the basis of conventional power law theory. The following points are of particular interest: (1) The primary creep data can be characterized using a simple power law. The exponent of time for spray ice is similar to that for solid polycrystalline ice. The exponent of stress is different for the two kinds of ice. (2) Pressuremeter tests gave secondary creep information that correlates well with the steady-rate settlement of the island. (3) Research into the possible range of primary creep parameters for spray ice is required, given that primary creep accounted for a large portion of the settlement of Mars Island. In particular, the effect of ice density on creep rates mast be resolved. (4) The pressuremeter is potentially an excellent design control device during the manufacture of future spray ice islands. The results of constant-pressure tests of 1–2 days duration could be used to check the design assumptions pertaining to the expected consolidation of the ice mass with time. Key words: spray ice, creep, artificial islands, pressuremeter, settlement.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Shields, D.
Domaschuk, L.
Funegard, E.
author_facet Shields, D.
Domaschuk, L.
Funegard, E.
author_sort Shields, D.
title Creep rates of spray ice
title_short Creep rates of spray ice
title_full Creep rates of spray ice
title_fullStr Creep rates of spray ice
title_full_unstemmed Creep rates of spray ice
title_sort creep rates of spray ice
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 1990
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/t90-022
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/t90-022
long_lat ENVELOPE(101.133,101.133,-66.050,-66.050)
geographic Mars Island
geographic_facet Mars Island
genre Beaufort Sea
genre_facet Beaufort Sea
op_source Canadian Geotechnical Journal
volume 27, issue 2, page 185-194
ISSN 0008-3674 1208-6010
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-022
container_title Canadian Geotechnical Journal
container_volume 27
container_issue 2
container_start_page 185
op_container_end_page 194
_version_ 1785579911493189632