INVESTIGATIONS DURING 1962 OF THE ALERT ANOMALY IN GEOMAGNETIC VARIATIONS

Magnetic variations measured at three stations across the strike of the anomaly in electrical conductivity of the earth's mantle suggested by Whitham and Andersen (1962) near Alert, Ellesmere Island, have been analyzed by simple potential theory. The anomalous internal contributions to the magn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Physics
Main Authors: Law, L. K., DeLaurier, J., Andersen, F., Whitham, K.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 1963
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/p63-187
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/p63-187
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/p63-187
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/p63-187 2023-12-17T10:29:42+01:00 INVESTIGATIONS DURING 1962 OF THE ALERT ANOMALY IN GEOMAGNETIC VARIATIONS Law, L. K. DeLaurier, J. Andersen, F. Whitham, K. 1963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/p63-187 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/p63-187 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Physics volume 41, issue 11, page 1868-1882 ISSN 0008-4204 1208-6045 General Physics and Astronomy journal-article 1963 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/p63-187 2023-11-19T13:38:28Z Magnetic variations measured at three stations across the strike of the anomaly in electrical conductivity of the earth's mantle suggested by Whitham and Andersen (1962) near Alert, Ellesmere Island, have been analyzed by simple potential theory. The anomalous internal contributions to the magnetic variation vector show striking confinement consistent with an underground current in a northeast–southwest direction at a depth between 50 and 70 km, a few kilometers southeast of Alert. If the anomalous conductor is approximated by a uniform infinite cylinder, the horizontal field response as a function of frequency can then be explained with a conductivity of [Formula: see text] e.m.u. and a cylindrical radius of about 50 km. The vertical field response is, however, an unsatisfactory fit to this model. A possible asymmetry is noted based on the hourly range data: this could be explained by the dipping of the real conductor under Ellesmere Island.Preliminary earth potential measurements show that, as expected, the electric field variations are abnormally low at Alert.The gravitational consequences of the cylindrical model are discussed and compared with two profiles from the same region. A Bouguer anomaly is found in the predicted region if certain regional gradients are assumed, but its magnitude is smaller than that predicted from the cylindrical model in hydrostatic equilibrium. It is clear that approximate agreement can be obtained with crustal thinning of some 20 km.The significance of the thermal anomaly thought to be responsible for the electrical conductivity anomaly is discussed briefly. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ellesmere Island Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref) Ellesmere Island Canadian Journal of Physics 41 11 1868 1882
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic General Physics and Astronomy
spellingShingle General Physics and Astronomy
Law, L. K.
DeLaurier, J.
Andersen, F.
Whitham, K.
INVESTIGATIONS DURING 1962 OF THE ALERT ANOMALY IN GEOMAGNETIC VARIATIONS
topic_facet General Physics and Astronomy
description Magnetic variations measured at three stations across the strike of the anomaly in electrical conductivity of the earth's mantle suggested by Whitham and Andersen (1962) near Alert, Ellesmere Island, have been analyzed by simple potential theory. The anomalous internal contributions to the magnetic variation vector show striking confinement consistent with an underground current in a northeast–southwest direction at a depth between 50 and 70 km, a few kilometers southeast of Alert. If the anomalous conductor is approximated by a uniform infinite cylinder, the horizontal field response as a function of frequency can then be explained with a conductivity of [Formula: see text] e.m.u. and a cylindrical radius of about 50 km. The vertical field response is, however, an unsatisfactory fit to this model. A possible asymmetry is noted based on the hourly range data: this could be explained by the dipping of the real conductor under Ellesmere Island.Preliminary earth potential measurements show that, as expected, the electric field variations are abnormally low at Alert.The gravitational consequences of the cylindrical model are discussed and compared with two profiles from the same region. A Bouguer anomaly is found in the predicted region if certain regional gradients are assumed, but its magnitude is smaller than that predicted from the cylindrical model in hydrostatic equilibrium. It is clear that approximate agreement can be obtained with crustal thinning of some 20 km.The significance of the thermal anomaly thought to be responsible for the electrical conductivity anomaly is discussed briefly.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Law, L. K.
DeLaurier, J.
Andersen, F.
Whitham, K.
author_facet Law, L. K.
DeLaurier, J.
Andersen, F.
Whitham, K.
author_sort Law, L. K.
title INVESTIGATIONS DURING 1962 OF THE ALERT ANOMALY IN GEOMAGNETIC VARIATIONS
title_short INVESTIGATIONS DURING 1962 OF THE ALERT ANOMALY IN GEOMAGNETIC VARIATIONS
title_full INVESTIGATIONS DURING 1962 OF THE ALERT ANOMALY IN GEOMAGNETIC VARIATIONS
title_fullStr INVESTIGATIONS DURING 1962 OF THE ALERT ANOMALY IN GEOMAGNETIC VARIATIONS
title_full_unstemmed INVESTIGATIONS DURING 1962 OF THE ALERT ANOMALY IN GEOMAGNETIC VARIATIONS
title_sort investigations during 1962 of the alert anomaly in geomagnetic variations
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 1963
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/p63-187
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/p63-187
geographic Ellesmere Island
geographic_facet Ellesmere Island
genre Ellesmere Island
genre_facet Ellesmere Island
op_source Canadian Journal of Physics
volume 41, issue 11, page 1868-1882
ISSN 0008-4204 1208-6045
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/p63-187
container_title Canadian Journal of Physics
container_volume 41
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1868
op_container_end_page 1882
_version_ 1785582160086827008