Peak runoff simulation in a subarctic region

Due to the lack of stream guaging stations, a peak flow simulation based on physical and meteorological parameters was established for the area along the proposed Mackenzie Valley Highway between Fort Good Hope and the Dempster Highway.Calculations based on snowmelt and rain-on-snow runoff were deve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
Main Authors: Penel, J., Kung, T.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 1976
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/l76-059
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/l76-059
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/l76-059
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/l76-059 2023-12-17T10:30:17+01:00 Peak runoff simulation in a subarctic region Penel, J. Kung, T. 1976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/l76-059 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/l76-059 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering volume 3, issue 4, page 555-562 ISSN 0315-1468 1208-6029 General Environmental Science Civil and Structural Engineering journal-article 1976 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/l76-059 2023-11-19T13:39:13Z Due to the lack of stream guaging stations, a peak flow simulation based on physical and meteorological parameters was established for the area along the proposed Mackenzie Valley Highway between Fort Good Hope and the Dempster Highway.Calculations based on snowmelt and rain-on-snow runoff were developed, as it was found that the snowmelt of May or early June gave the yearly spring peak discharge.Due to the gap in existing flow data, a unit hydrograph method was developed to generate additional yearly spring peak discharges. Altogether, hydrographs from four gauged watersheds of similar physical conditions with size ranging from 250 to 8 200 mi 2 (648 to 21 240 km 2 ) were used. In total, 46 yearly peak flows were generated.A regression equation of peak discharge computation was derived, using different hydrological and meteorological parameters. It was found that the most significant factors were the drainage basin area, the lake areas in the drainage basin, the water equivalent of the snow on the ground prior to melt, the rainfall in the period close to peak discharges, and the duration of snowmelt.The simulation was calibrated for drainage basins between 100 and 10 000 mi 2 (250 to 25 000 km 2 ). Article in Journal/Newspaper Fort Good Hope Mackenzie Valley Subarctic Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref) Mackenzie Valley ENVELOPE(-126.070,-126.070,52.666,52.666) Fort Good Hope ENVELOPE(-128.637,-128.637,66.257,66.257) Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 3 4 555 562
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic General Environmental Science
Civil and Structural Engineering
spellingShingle General Environmental Science
Civil and Structural Engineering
Penel, J.
Kung, T.
Peak runoff simulation in a subarctic region
topic_facet General Environmental Science
Civil and Structural Engineering
description Due to the lack of stream guaging stations, a peak flow simulation based on physical and meteorological parameters was established for the area along the proposed Mackenzie Valley Highway between Fort Good Hope and the Dempster Highway.Calculations based on snowmelt and rain-on-snow runoff were developed, as it was found that the snowmelt of May or early June gave the yearly spring peak discharge.Due to the gap in existing flow data, a unit hydrograph method was developed to generate additional yearly spring peak discharges. Altogether, hydrographs from four gauged watersheds of similar physical conditions with size ranging from 250 to 8 200 mi 2 (648 to 21 240 km 2 ) were used. In total, 46 yearly peak flows were generated.A regression equation of peak discharge computation was derived, using different hydrological and meteorological parameters. It was found that the most significant factors were the drainage basin area, the lake areas in the drainage basin, the water equivalent of the snow on the ground prior to melt, the rainfall in the period close to peak discharges, and the duration of snowmelt.The simulation was calibrated for drainage basins between 100 and 10 000 mi 2 (250 to 25 000 km 2 ).
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Penel, J.
Kung, T.
author_facet Penel, J.
Kung, T.
author_sort Penel, J.
title Peak runoff simulation in a subarctic region
title_short Peak runoff simulation in a subarctic region
title_full Peak runoff simulation in a subarctic region
title_fullStr Peak runoff simulation in a subarctic region
title_full_unstemmed Peak runoff simulation in a subarctic region
title_sort peak runoff simulation in a subarctic region
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 1976
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/l76-059
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/l76-059
long_lat ENVELOPE(-126.070,-126.070,52.666,52.666)
ENVELOPE(-128.637,-128.637,66.257,66.257)
geographic Mackenzie Valley
Fort Good Hope
geographic_facet Mackenzie Valley
Fort Good Hope
genre Fort Good Hope
Mackenzie Valley
Subarctic
genre_facet Fort Good Hope
Mackenzie Valley
Subarctic
op_source Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
volume 3, issue 4, page 555-562
ISSN 0315-1468 1208-6029
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/l76-059
container_title Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
container_volume 3
container_issue 4
container_start_page 555
op_container_end_page 562
_version_ 1785583220057702400