Fish Distribution and Catchability: What Is the Appropriate Measure of Distribution?

Catchability to commercial fisheries has been predicted to be density dependent due to density-dependent variation in stock area. Previous studies have used indices of stock area based on thresholds of absolute density. These indices will increase with abundance even if density increases uniformly o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Main Authors: Swain, D. P., Sinclair, A. F.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 1994
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f94-104
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/f94-104
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/f94-104
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/f94-104 2024-06-23T07:51:05+00:00 Fish Distribution and Catchability: What Is the Appropriate Measure of Distribution? Swain, D. P. Sinclair, A. F. 1994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f94-104 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/f94-104 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences volume 51, issue 5, page 1046-1054 ISSN 0706-652X 1205-7533 journal-article 1994 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/f94-104 2024-06-13T04:10:51Z Catchability to commercial fisheries has been predicted to be density dependent due to density-dependent variation in stock area. Previous studies have used indices of stock area based on thresholds of absolute density. These indices will increase with abundance even if density increases uniformly over all areas. We show that spatially uniform changes in abundance can affect catchability given certain models for the distribution of fishing effort, but that this effect is slight compared with the effect of changes in the spatial spread of fish distribution. We describe an index of distribution that depends only on spatial spread: the minimum area over which a specified percentage of the population is spread. We tested the density dependence of this index using data on Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. Results depended on the percentage of the population for which the index was evaluated. The area containing most (90 or 95%) of the population was density dependent, expanding as population size increased. The area of highest cod concentration (i.e., the area containing 50% of the population) did not expand significantly as population size increased. Article in Journal/Newspaper atlantic cod Gadus morhua Canadian Science Publishing Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51 5 1046 1054
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
description Catchability to commercial fisheries has been predicted to be density dependent due to density-dependent variation in stock area. Previous studies have used indices of stock area based on thresholds of absolute density. These indices will increase with abundance even if density increases uniformly over all areas. We show that spatially uniform changes in abundance can affect catchability given certain models for the distribution of fishing effort, but that this effect is slight compared with the effect of changes in the spatial spread of fish distribution. We describe an index of distribution that depends only on spatial spread: the minimum area over which a specified percentage of the population is spread. We tested the density dependence of this index using data on Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. Results depended on the percentage of the population for which the index was evaluated. The area containing most (90 or 95%) of the population was density dependent, expanding as population size increased. The area of highest cod concentration (i.e., the area containing 50% of the population) did not expand significantly as population size increased.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Swain, D. P.
Sinclair, A. F.
spellingShingle Swain, D. P.
Sinclair, A. F.
Fish Distribution and Catchability: What Is the Appropriate Measure of Distribution?
author_facet Swain, D. P.
Sinclair, A. F.
author_sort Swain, D. P.
title Fish Distribution and Catchability: What Is the Appropriate Measure of Distribution?
title_short Fish Distribution and Catchability: What Is the Appropriate Measure of Distribution?
title_full Fish Distribution and Catchability: What Is the Appropriate Measure of Distribution?
title_fullStr Fish Distribution and Catchability: What Is the Appropriate Measure of Distribution?
title_full_unstemmed Fish Distribution and Catchability: What Is the Appropriate Measure of Distribution?
title_sort fish distribution and catchability: what is the appropriate measure of distribution?
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 1994
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f94-104
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/f94-104
genre atlantic cod
Gadus morhua
genre_facet atlantic cod
Gadus morhua
op_source Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
volume 51, issue 5, page 1046-1054
ISSN 0706-652X 1205-7533
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/f94-104
container_title Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
container_volume 51
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1046
op_container_end_page 1054
_version_ 1802642079210274816