Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating the Food Intake of a Fish

Majkowski and Waiwood's (1981. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 1199–1206) method for evaluating the food intake of a fish involves numerically solving a first-order ordinary differential equation and using a minimization procedure. In this note, that method is compared with its two modifications...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Main Authors: Majkowski, Jacek, Hearn, William S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 1984
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f84-024
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/f84-024
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/f84-024
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/f84-024 2024-05-19T07:40:36+00:00 Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating the Food Intake of a Fish Majkowski, Jacek Hearn, William S. 1984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f84-024 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/f84-024 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences volume 41, issue 1, page 212-215 ISSN 0706-652X 1205-7533 journal-article 1984 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/f84-024 2024-04-25T06:52:02Z Majkowski and Waiwood's (1981. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 1199–1206) method for evaluating the food intake of a fish involves numerically solving a first-order ordinary differential equation and using a minimization procedure. In this note, that method is compared with its two modifications created by (1) the elimination of a mathematical approximation ("improved method") (but this makes the food intake estimation computationally even more difficult), and (2) the introduction of a different mathematical approximation ("simplified method") to involve only simple algebraic calculations. As a result of the latter modification, a certain assumption in the original and improved methods is relaxed and the required experimental information is reduced. Growth and bioenergetic data concerning Gulf of St. Lawrence cod (Gadus morhua) are used to illustrate the three methods and to examine the validity of the mathematical approximations introduced. The use of the original method results in larger errors in food intake estimates for cod than the simplified method. The food intake estimates using the improved method differ considerably (by 3.6–23.5% and 1.7–10.4%, respectively) from those based on the original and simplified methods, if the corresponding ratio of the weight increment to the initial weight is large (>2.3). Article in Journal/Newspaper Gadus morhua Canadian Science Publishing Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41 1 212 215
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
description Majkowski and Waiwood's (1981. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 1199–1206) method for evaluating the food intake of a fish involves numerically solving a first-order ordinary differential equation and using a minimization procedure. In this note, that method is compared with its two modifications created by (1) the elimination of a mathematical approximation ("improved method") (but this makes the food intake estimation computationally even more difficult), and (2) the introduction of a different mathematical approximation ("simplified method") to involve only simple algebraic calculations. As a result of the latter modification, a certain assumption in the original and improved methods is relaxed and the required experimental information is reduced. Growth and bioenergetic data concerning Gulf of St. Lawrence cod (Gadus morhua) are used to illustrate the three methods and to examine the validity of the mathematical approximations introduced. The use of the original method results in larger errors in food intake estimates for cod than the simplified method. The food intake estimates using the improved method differ considerably (by 3.6–23.5% and 1.7–10.4%, respectively) from those based on the original and simplified methods, if the corresponding ratio of the weight increment to the initial weight is large (>2.3).
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Majkowski, Jacek
Hearn, William S.
spellingShingle Majkowski, Jacek
Hearn, William S.
Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating the Food Intake of a Fish
author_facet Majkowski, Jacek
Hearn, William S.
author_sort Majkowski, Jacek
title Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating the Food Intake of a Fish
title_short Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating the Food Intake of a Fish
title_full Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating the Food Intake of a Fish
title_fullStr Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating the Food Intake of a Fish
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating the Food Intake of a Fish
title_sort comparison of three methods for estimating the food intake of a fish
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 1984
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f84-024
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/f84-024
genre Gadus morhua
genre_facet Gadus morhua
op_source Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
volume 41, issue 1, page 212-215
ISSN 0706-652X 1205-7533
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/f84-024
container_title Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
container_volume 41
container_issue 1
container_start_page 212
op_container_end_page 215
_version_ 1799480178519310336