Population Dynamics and Management of the Northwest Atlantic Harp Seal ( Phoca groenlandica )

Previous methods of estimating population size and natural mortality rate in harp seals (Phoca groenlandica) are reviewed. Excepting the method of Beddington and Williams (Marine Mammal Comm., Washington, DC., Rep. MMC 79-03, 1980) all previous methods rely heavily upon the survival index method of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Main Authors: Roff, Derek A., Bowen, W. Don
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 1983
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f83-118
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/f83-118
Description
Summary:Previous methods of estimating population size and natural mortality rate in harp seals (Phoca groenlandica) are reviewed. Excepting the method of Beddington and Williams (Marine Mammal Comm., Washington, DC., Rep. MMC 79-03, 1980) all previous methods rely heavily upon the survival index method of estimating pup production. We describe the mathematical rationale underlying this method and indicate potential sources of bias. Beddington and Williams' analysis produces a combination of vital rates for 1952 that would not enable a population to persist in the absence of hunting. This suggests that the method may not be able to estimate these parameters accurately. This conclusion is supported by several unpublished analyses. We present an alternative method of analysis that is based on the concept of maximum likelihood. We estimate the rate of natural mortality and trend in 1 + population size from 1967 to 1980, using mark–recapture estimates of pup production in the late 1970s and the observed ratio of the survival of adjacent cohorts in the late 1960s and early 1970s to constrain population trajectories from a simulation model. From this analysis we conclude that the population is increasing and that the present total catch may be substantially smaller than the replacement yield.