Potential lasting impacts of industrial herbicides on ungulate nutrition

Glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH) are an effective, yet controversial, tool for reducing the survival and growth of deciduous vegetation in commercial tree plantations. While glyphosate residues can be stored in plants for over 10 years, the nutritional impacts of GBH for ungulate forage are unknown...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Main Authors: Werner, Jeffery R., Wood, Lisa J., Botten, Nicole, Fredeen, Art
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2021-0283
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cjfr-2021-0283
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjfr-2021-0283
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/cjfr-2021-0283
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/cjfr-2021-0283 2024-04-28T07:53:51+00:00 Potential lasting impacts of industrial herbicides on ungulate nutrition Werner, Jeffery R. Wood, Lisa J. Botten, Nicole Fredeen, Art 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2021-0283 https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cjfr-2021-0283 https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjfr-2021-0283 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Forest Research volume 52, issue 7, page 1098-1109 ISSN 0045-5067 1208-6037 Ecology Forestry Global and Planetary Change journal-article 2022 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2021-0283 2024-04-09T06:56:26Z Glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH) are an effective, yet controversial, tool for reducing the survival and growth of deciduous vegetation in commercial tree plantations. While glyphosate residues can be stored in plants for over 10 years, the nutritional impacts of GBH for ungulate forage are unknown. Here we compare the energy and protein content of moose ( Alces alces) food plants in central British Columbia, Canada. Willow ( Salix bebbiana), dogwood ( Cornus sericea), and fireweed ( Chamaenerion angustifolium) samples were obtained from regenerating cut blocks 1, 3, 6, and 12 years after GBH treatment and from untreated controls with identical initiation dates. We predicted that surviving plants would exhibit reduced palatability, digestibility, and nutritional value compared to controls, and that these effects would last at least 1 year before dissipating. Contrary to predictions, concentrations of digestible protein were higher in treated blocks 1 year after herbicide application, but in subsequent years there were few significant differences in protein from treated versus untreated forage. Digestible energy concentrations were identical to controls 1 year after exposure, but significant reductions were observed after 12 years. Results indicate potential nonlinear, complex, and long-lasting effects of GBH on the constituents of understory plants with implications for ungulate forage quality. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Canadian Science Publishing Canadian Journal of Forest Research
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic Ecology
Forestry
Global and Planetary Change
spellingShingle Ecology
Forestry
Global and Planetary Change
Werner, Jeffery R.
Wood, Lisa J.
Botten, Nicole
Fredeen, Art
Potential lasting impacts of industrial herbicides on ungulate nutrition
topic_facet Ecology
Forestry
Global and Planetary Change
description Glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH) are an effective, yet controversial, tool for reducing the survival and growth of deciduous vegetation in commercial tree plantations. While glyphosate residues can be stored in plants for over 10 years, the nutritional impacts of GBH for ungulate forage are unknown. Here we compare the energy and protein content of moose ( Alces alces) food plants in central British Columbia, Canada. Willow ( Salix bebbiana), dogwood ( Cornus sericea), and fireweed ( Chamaenerion angustifolium) samples were obtained from regenerating cut blocks 1, 3, 6, and 12 years after GBH treatment and from untreated controls with identical initiation dates. We predicted that surviving plants would exhibit reduced palatability, digestibility, and nutritional value compared to controls, and that these effects would last at least 1 year before dissipating. Contrary to predictions, concentrations of digestible protein were higher in treated blocks 1 year after herbicide application, but in subsequent years there were few significant differences in protein from treated versus untreated forage. Digestible energy concentrations were identical to controls 1 year after exposure, but significant reductions were observed after 12 years. Results indicate potential nonlinear, complex, and long-lasting effects of GBH on the constituents of understory plants with implications for ungulate forage quality.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Werner, Jeffery R.
Wood, Lisa J.
Botten, Nicole
Fredeen, Art
author_facet Werner, Jeffery R.
Wood, Lisa J.
Botten, Nicole
Fredeen, Art
author_sort Werner, Jeffery R.
title Potential lasting impacts of industrial herbicides on ungulate nutrition
title_short Potential lasting impacts of industrial herbicides on ungulate nutrition
title_full Potential lasting impacts of industrial herbicides on ungulate nutrition
title_fullStr Potential lasting impacts of industrial herbicides on ungulate nutrition
title_full_unstemmed Potential lasting impacts of industrial herbicides on ungulate nutrition
title_sort potential lasting impacts of industrial herbicides on ungulate nutrition
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2021-0283
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cjfr-2021-0283
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjfr-2021-0283
genre Alces alces
genre_facet Alces alces
op_source Canadian Journal of Forest Research
volume 52, issue 7, page 1098-1109
ISSN 0045-5067 1208-6037
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2021-0283
container_title Canadian Journal of Forest Research
_version_ 1797573708481560576