A comparison of hierarchical models for relative catch efficiency based on paired-gear data for US Northwest Atlantic fish stocks

Selectivity and catch comparison studies are important for surveys that use two or more gears to collect relative abundance information. Prevailing model-based analytical methods for studies using a paired-gear design assume a binomial model for the data from each pair of gear sets. Important genera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Main Author: Miller, Timothy J.
Other Authors: Trenkel, Verena
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0136
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0136
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0136
_version_ 1821664725072609280
author Miller, Timothy J.
author2 Trenkel, Verena
author_facet Miller, Timothy J.
author_sort Miller, Timothy J.
collection Canadian Science Publishing
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1306
container_title Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
container_volume 70
description Selectivity and catch comparison studies are important for surveys that use two or more gears to collect relative abundance information. Prevailing model-based analytical methods for studies using a paired-gear design assume a binomial model for the data from each pair of gear sets. Important generalizations include nonparametric smooth size effects and normal random pair and size effects, but current methods for fitting models that account for random smooth size effects are restrictive, and observations within pairs may exhibit extra-binomial variation. I propose a hierarchical model that accounts for random smooth size effects among pairs and extra-binomial variation within pairs with a conditional beta-binomial distribution. I compared relative performance of models with different conditional distribution and random effects assumptions fit to data on 16 species from an experiment carried out in the US Northwest Atlantic Ocean comparing a new and a retiring vessel. For more than half of the species, conditional beta-binomial models performed better than binomial models, and accounting for random variation among pairs in the relative efficiency was important for all species.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Northwest Atlantic
genre_facet Northwest Atlantic
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/cjfas-2013-0136
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
op_container_end_page 1316
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0136
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_source Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
volume 70, issue 9, page 1306-1316
ISSN 0706-652X 1205-7533
publishDate 2013
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/cjfas-2013-0136 2025-01-16T23:56:36+00:00 A comparison of hierarchical models for relative catch efficiency based on paired-gear data for US Northwest Atlantic fish stocks Miller, Timothy J. Trenkel, Verena 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0136 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0136 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0136 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences volume 70, issue 9, page 1306-1316 ISSN 0706-652X 1205-7533 journal-article 2013 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0136 2024-08-29T04:08:50Z Selectivity and catch comparison studies are important for surveys that use two or more gears to collect relative abundance information. Prevailing model-based analytical methods for studies using a paired-gear design assume a binomial model for the data from each pair of gear sets. Important generalizations include nonparametric smooth size effects and normal random pair and size effects, but current methods for fitting models that account for random smooth size effects are restrictive, and observations within pairs may exhibit extra-binomial variation. I propose a hierarchical model that accounts for random smooth size effects among pairs and extra-binomial variation within pairs with a conditional beta-binomial distribution. I compared relative performance of models with different conditional distribution and random effects assumptions fit to data on 16 species from an experiment carried out in the US Northwest Atlantic Ocean comparing a new and a retiring vessel. For more than half of the species, conditional beta-binomial models performed better than binomial models, and accounting for random variation among pairs in the relative efficiency was important for all species. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northwest Atlantic Canadian Science Publishing Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 70 9 1306 1316
spellingShingle Miller, Timothy J.
A comparison of hierarchical models for relative catch efficiency based on paired-gear data for US Northwest Atlantic fish stocks
title A comparison of hierarchical models for relative catch efficiency based on paired-gear data for US Northwest Atlantic fish stocks
title_full A comparison of hierarchical models for relative catch efficiency based on paired-gear data for US Northwest Atlantic fish stocks
title_fullStr A comparison of hierarchical models for relative catch efficiency based on paired-gear data for US Northwest Atlantic fish stocks
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of hierarchical models for relative catch efficiency based on paired-gear data for US Northwest Atlantic fish stocks
title_short A comparison of hierarchical models for relative catch efficiency based on paired-gear data for US Northwest Atlantic fish stocks
title_sort comparison of hierarchical models for relative catch efficiency based on paired-gear data for us northwest atlantic fish stocks
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0136
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0136
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0136