Predicting flowering phenology in a subarctic plant community

Phenological studies are rarely reported from arctic and subarctic regions, but are essential to evaluate species’ response to climate change in these rapidly warming ecosystems. Here, we present a phylogenetic analysis of flowering phenology across an elevational gradient in the Canadian subarctic....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Botany
Main Authors: Lessard-Therrien, Malie, Bolmgren, Kjell, Davies, T. Jonathan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2014-0026
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cjb-2014-0026
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjb-2014-0026
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/cjb-2014-0026
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/cjb-2014-0026 2023-12-17T10:26:16+01:00 Predicting flowering phenology in a subarctic plant community Lessard-Therrien, Malie Bolmgren, Kjell Davies, T. Jonathan 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2014-0026 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cjb-2014-0026 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjb-2014-0026 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Botany volume 92, issue 10, page 749-756 ISSN 1916-2790 1916-2804 Plant Science Ecology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 2014 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2014-0026 2023-11-19T13:39:07Z Phenological studies are rarely reported from arctic and subarctic regions, but are essential to evaluate species’ response to climate change in these rapidly warming ecosystems. Here, we present a phylogenetic analysis of flowering phenology across an elevational gradient in the Canadian subarctic. We found that the timing of first flower was best explained by a combination of snowmelt, elevation, and growing degree-days. We also show that early flowering species have demonstrated lower intraspecific variability in their response to climate cues in comparison with late flowering species, such that individual flowering times of early species are more closely tied to environmental predictors. Previous work has suggested that early flowering species are more variable in their phenology. However, these studies have mostly examined variation in phenology over time, whereas we examined variation in phenology over space. We suggest that both patterns can be explained by the tighter coupling between phenology and climate cues for early flowering species. Thus, early flowering species have low intraspecific variance in flowering times within a single growing season as individuals respond more uniformly to a common set of cues in comparison with late flowering species. However, these same species may show large variance between years reflecting interannual variation in climate. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Climate change Subarctic Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref) Arctic Botany 92 10 749 756
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic Plant Science
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Plant Science
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Lessard-Therrien, Malie
Bolmgren, Kjell
Davies, T. Jonathan
Predicting flowering phenology in a subarctic plant community
topic_facet Plant Science
Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description Phenological studies are rarely reported from arctic and subarctic regions, but are essential to evaluate species’ response to climate change in these rapidly warming ecosystems. Here, we present a phylogenetic analysis of flowering phenology across an elevational gradient in the Canadian subarctic. We found that the timing of first flower was best explained by a combination of snowmelt, elevation, and growing degree-days. We also show that early flowering species have demonstrated lower intraspecific variability in their response to climate cues in comparison with late flowering species, such that individual flowering times of early species are more closely tied to environmental predictors. Previous work has suggested that early flowering species are more variable in their phenology. However, these studies have mostly examined variation in phenology over time, whereas we examined variation in phenology over space. We suggest that both patterns can be explained by the tighter coupling between phenology and climate cues for early flowering species. Thus, early flowering species have low intraspecific variance in flowering times within a single growing season as individuals respond more uniformly to a common set of cues in comparison with late flowering species. However, these same species may show large variance between years reflecting interannual variation in climate.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lessard-Therrien, Malie
Bolmgren, Kjell
Davies, T. Jonathan
author_facet Lessard-Therrien, Malie
Bolmgren, Kjell
Davies, T. Jonathan
author_sort Lessard-Therrien, Malie
title Predicting flowering phenology in a subarctic plant community
title_short Predicting flowering phenology in a subarctic plant community
title_full Predicting flowering phenology in a subarctic plant community
title_fullStr Predicting flowering phenology in a subarctic plant community
title_full_unstemmed Predicting flowering phenology in a subarctic plant community
title_sort predicting flowering phenology in a subarctic plant community
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 2014
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2014-0026
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cjb-2014-0026
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjb-2014-0026
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
Subarctic
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
Subarctic
op_source Botany
volume 92, issue 10, page 749-756
ISSN 1916-2790 1916-2804
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2014-0026
container_title Botany
container_volume 92
container_issue 10
container_start_page 749
op_container_end_page 756
_version_ 1785577990728450048