Nutritional evaluation of seal by-products as an alternative protein source for use in monogastric animals

Seal by-products (grey seal with the bone in, grey seal with the bone removed, and harp seal) were subjected to five different processing methods: high (100 °C) and low (45 °C) temperature oven-drying, freeze-drying (FD), silage by acid or natural fermentation. Growth performance of diets containing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Main Authors: Anderson, Derek M., Priest, Gina, Collins, Stephanie A., MacIsaac, Janice L.
Other Authors: Miglior, Filippo
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2019-0055
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cjas-2019-0055
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjas-2019-0055
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/cjas-2019-0055
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/cjas-2019-0055 2024-09-15T18:10:47+00:00 Nutritional evaluation of seal by-products as an alternative protein source for use in monogastric animals Anderson, Derek M. Priest, Gina Collins, Stephanie A. MacIsaac, Janice L. Miglior, Filippo 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2019-0055 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cjas-2019-0055 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjas-2019-0055 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Animal Science volume 100, issue 1, page 77-84 ISSN 0008-3984 1918-1825 journal-article 2020 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2019-0055 2024-08-01T04:10:03Z Seal by-products (grey seal with the bone in, grey seal with the bone removed, and harp seal) were subjected to five different processing methods: high (100 °C) and low (45 °C) temperature oven-drying, freeze-drying (FD), silage by acid or natural fermentation. Growth performance of diets containing these seal by-products was evaluated in rats as a monogastric model species. With the exception of naturally fermented grey seal without bone, weight gains for rats fed the boneless grey seal products were highest of the seal products (24.65–30.04 g rat −1 ) and statistically similar to those of rats fed casein (32.15 g rat −1 ). An in vivo crude protein (CP) digestibility study was conducted using 12 adult white rats in metabolic cages that allowed separate collection of urine and feces. The 16% CP diets contained chromic oxide as an inert fecal marker at 0.5%. Total fecal and urine production, as well as feed and water intake, were recorded daily within the three experimental periods. Digestibility of CP was significantly higher for the naturally fermented grey seal without bone silage (94.0%) than casein (89.0%), whereas the other seal products were statistically similar (91.7%–92.7%). The CP content of FD grey seal was as high as 91.7% (FD). Seal by-products have the potential to be used as alternative high-protein feedstuffs in monogastric diets. Article in Journal/Newspaper Harp Seal Canadian Science Publishing Canadian Journal of Animal Science 100 1 77 84
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
description Seal by-products (grey seal with the bone in, grey seal with the bone removed, and harp seal) were subjected to five different processing methods: high (100 °C) and low (45 °C) temperature oven-drying, freeze-drying (FD), silage by acid or natural fermentation. Growth performance of diets containing these seal by-products was evaluated in rats as a monogastric model species. With the exception of naturally fermented grey seal without bone, weight gains for rats fed the boneless grey seal products were highest of the seal products (24.65–30.04 g rat −1 ) and statistically similar to those of rats fed casein (32.15 g rat −1 ). An in vivo crude protein (CP) digestibility study was conducted using 12 adult white rats in metabolic cages that allowed separate collection of urine and feces. The 16% CP diets contained chromic oxide as an inert fecal marker at 0.5%. Total fecal and urine production, as well as feed and water intake, were recorded daily within the three experimental periods. Digestibility of CP was significantly higher for the naturally fermented grey seal without bone silage (94.0%) than casein (89.0%), whereas the other seal products were statistically similar (91.7%–92.7%). The CP content of FD grey seal was as high as 91.7% (FD). Seal by-products have the potential to be used as alternative high-protein feedstuffs in monogastric diets.
author2 Miglior, Filippo
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Anderson, Derek M.
Priest, Gina
Collins, Stephanie A.
MacIsaac, Janice L.
spellingShingle Anderson, Derek M.
Priest, Gina
Collins, Stephanie A.
MacIsaac, Janice L.
Nutritional evaluation of seal by-products as an alternative protein source for use in monogastric animals
author_facet Anderson, Derek M.
Priest, Gina
Collins, Stephanie A.
MacIsaac, Janice L.
author_sort Anderson, Derek M.
title Nutritional evaluation of seal by-products as an alternative protein source for use in monogastric animals
title_short Nutritional evaluation of seal by-products as an alternative protein source for use in monogastric animals
title_full Nutritional evaluation of seal by-products as an alternative protein source for use in monogastric animals
title_fullStr Nutritional evaluation of seal by-products as an alternative protein source for use in monogastric animals
title_full_unstemmed Nutritional evaluation of seal by-products as an alternative protein source for use in monogastric animals
title_sort nutritional evaluation of seal by-products as an alternative protein source for use in monogastric animals
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2019-0055
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cjas-2019-0055
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cjas-2019-0055
genre Harp Seal
genre_facet Harp Seal
op_source Canadian Journal of Animal Science
volume 100, issue 1, page 77-84
ISSN 0008-3984 1918-1825
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2019-0055
container_title Canadian Journal of Animal Science
container_volume 100
container_issue 1
container_start_page 77
op_container_end_page 84
_version_ 1810448361338175488