Estimating in situ relative density and friction angle of nearshore sand from portable free-fall penetrometer tests

The friction angle of sand in the nearshore zone of Cannon Beach, Yakutat, Alaska, was estimated from the deceleration measured by a portable free-fall penetrometer (PFFP) at 72 test locations. A correlation between the relative density and PFFP’s maximum deceleration was developed from controlled P...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Main Authors: Albatal, Ali, Stark, Nina, Castellanos, Bernardo
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0267
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cgj-2018-0267
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cgj-2018-0267
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/cgj-2018-0267
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/cgj-2018-0267 2024-06-23T07:57:25+00:00 Estimating in situ relative density and friction angle of nearshore sand from portable free-fall penetrometer tests Albatal, Ali Stark, Nina Castellanos, Bernardo 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0267 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cgj-2018-0267 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cgj-2018-0267 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Geotechnical Journal volume 57, issue 1, page 17-31 ISSN 0008-3674 1208-6010 journal-article 2020 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0267 2024-06-13T04:10:50Z The friction angle of sand in the nearshore zone of Cannon Beach, Yakutat, Alaska, was estimated from the deceleration measured by a portable free-fall penetrometer (PFFP) at 72 test locations. A correlation between the relative density and PFFP’s maximum deceleration was developed from controlled PFFP deployments into sand of different relative densities. Two approaches were tested: (i) a correlation between relative density and friction angle and (ii) bearing capacity theory. For the former, laboratory vacuum triaxial tests were performed to adjust an existing correlation between relative density and friction angle for the tested nearshore sediments. In situ peak friction angles were then determined using this adjusted correlation and estimates of relative densities. The resulting in situ relative density and friction angle varied between 32%–88% and 44°–56°, respectively. Two bearing capacity–based methods suitable for shallow penetrations were tested. For this approach, equivalents of static cone resistance were determined from the measured decelerations considering the strain rate effect. A range of empirical strain rate coefficients K = 0.1–1.5 were tested. A K value between 0.2 and 0.4 yielded matching results between the two approaches. The estimated friction angles agreed well with expected values and may be applied to problems of sediment transport or early site assessment. Article in Journal/Newspaper Yakutat Alaska Canadian Science Publishing Canadian Geotechnical Journal 57 1 17 31
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
description The friction angle of sand in the nearshore zone of Cannon Beach, Yakutat, Alaska, was estimated from the deceleration measured by a portable free-fall penetrometer (PFFP) at 72 test locations. A correlation between the relative density and PFFP’s maximum deceleration was developed from controlled PFFP deployments into sand of different relative densities. Two approaches were tested: (i) a correlation between relative density and friction angle and (ii) bearing capacity theory. For the former, laboratory vacuum triaxial tests were performed to adjust an existing correlation between relative density and friction angle for the tested nearshore sediments. In situ peak friction angles were then determined using this adjusted correlation and estimates of relative densities. The resulting in situ relative density and friction angle varied between 32%–88% and 44°–56°, respectively. Two bearing capacity–based methods suitable for shallow penetrations were tested. For this approach, equivalents of static cone resistance were determined from the measured decelerations considering the strain rate effect. A range of empirical strain rate coefficients K = 0.1–1.5 were tested. A K value between 0.2 and 0.4 yielded matching results between the two approaches. The estimated friction angles agreed well with expected values and may be applied to problems of sediment transport or early site assessment.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Albatal, Ali
Stark, Nina
Castellanos, Bernardo
spellingShingle Albatal, Ali
Stark, Nina
Castellanos, Bernardo
Estimating in situ relative density and friction angle of nearshore sand from portable free-fall penetrometer tests
author_facet Albatal, Ali
Stark, Nina
Castellanos, Bernardo
author_sort Albatal, Ali
title Estimating in situ relative density and friction angle of nearshore sand from portable free-fall penetrometer tests
title_short Estimating in situ relative density and friction angle of nearshore sand from portable free-fall penetrometer tests
title_full Estimating in situ relative density and friction angle of nearshore sand from portable free-fall penetrometer tests
title_fullStr Estimating in situ relative density and friction angle of nearshore sand from portable free-fall penetrometer tests
title_full_unstemmed Estimating in situ relative density and friction angle of nearshore sand from portable free-fall penetrometer tests
title_sort estimating in situ relative density and friction angle of nearshore sand from portable free-fall penetrometer tests
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0267
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/cgj-2018-0267
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/cgj-2018-0267
genre Yakutat
Alaska
genre_facet Yakutat
Alaska
op_source Canadian Geotechnical Journal
volume 57, issue 1, page 17-31
ISSN 0008-3674 1208-6010
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0267
container_title Canadian Geotechnical Journal
container_volume 57
container_issue 1
container_start_page 17
op_container_end_page 31
_version_ 1802651054807973888