Rapport des sexes, effort et succès de reproduction chez Rubus chamaemorus , plante herbacée vivace dioïque de distribution subarctique

Studies published on the reproductive success of dioecious species concentrate on the role of sex ratios and pollinator behaviour. In the case of Rubus chamaemorus L., a circumboreal dioecious species, we hypothesized that flower survival and biomass allocation to reproductive tissues, which are cli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Botany
Main Authors: Dumas, Pascale, Maillette, Lucie
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 1987
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b87-354
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/b87-354
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/b87-354
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/b87-354 2023-12-17T10:49:20+01:00 Rapport des sexes, effort et succès de reproduction chez Rubus chamaemorus , plante herbacée vivace dioïque de distribution subarctique Dumas, Pascale Maillette, Lucie 1987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b87-354 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/b87-354 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Botany volume 65, issue 12, page 2628-2639 ISSN 0008-4026 Plant Science journal-article 1987 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/b87-354 2023-11-19T13:38:51Z Studies published on the reproductive success of dioecious species concentrate on the role of sex ratios and pollinator behaviour. In the case of Rubus chamaemorus L., a circumboreal dioecious species, we hypothesized that flower survival and biomass allocation to reproductive tissues, which are climate dependent, also influence fruit production. Only 0.05% of total biomass is allocated to reproduction, whereas 94% goes to underground organs responsible for vegetative propagation. Many male (28 – 51%) and female flower buds (35 – 54%) and young fruits (24–51%) die prematurely mainly because of the climate; fruit production then becomes independent from initial female flower density. The scarcity of female flowers at most sites (except near open water) limits fruit production. The limited sexual reproduction would allow cloudberry to maintain somatic resources, thereby increasing the longevity of individuals and their chance of encountering the climatic conditions required for reproductive success. Such a strategy is adaptive in a variable climate like that of the subarctic. Furthermore, the reduced importance of sexual reproduction would diminish the need to optimize sex ratios. Other selective pressures (e.g., competition) would then favour male clones in most sites, in spite of the unproductive pollen excess. Article in Journal/Newspaper Rubus chamaemorus Subarctic subarctique* Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref) Canadian Journal of Botany 65 12 2628 2639
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic Plant Science
spellingShingle Plant Science
Dumas, Pascale
Maillette, Lucie
Rapport des sexes, effort et succès de reproduction chez Rubus chamaemorus , plante herbacée vivace dioïque de distribution subarctique
topic_facet Plant Science
description Studies published on the reproductive success of dioecious species concentrate on the role of sex ratios and pollinator behaviour. In the case of Rubus chamaemorus L., a circumboreal dioecious species, we hypothesized that flower survival and biomass allocation to reproductive tissues, which are climate dependent, also influence fruit production. Only 0.05% of total biomass is allocated to reproduction, whereas 94% goes to underground organs responsible for vegetative propagation. Many male (28 – 51%) and female flower buds (35 – 54%) and young fruits (24–51%) die prematurely mainly because of the climate; fruit production then becomes independent from initial female flower density. The scarcity of female flowers at most sites (except near open water) limits fruit production. The limited sexual reproduction would allow cloudberry to maintain somatic resources, thereby increasing the longevity of individuals and their chance of encountering the climatic conditions required for reproductive success. Such a strategy is adaptive in a variable climate like that of the subarctic. Furthermore, the reduced importance of sexual reproduction would diminish the need to optimize sex ratios. Other selective pressures (e.g., competition) would then favour male clones in most sites, in spite of the unproductive pollen excess.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Dumas, Pascale
Maillette, Lucie
author_facet Dumas, Pascale
Maillette, Lucie
author_sort Dumas, Pascale
title Rapport des sexes, effort et succès de reproduction chez Rubus chamaemorus , plante herbacée vivace dioïque de distribution subarctique
title_short Rapport des sexes, effort et succès de reproduction chez Rubus chamaemorus , plante herbacée vivace dioïque de distribution subarctique
title_full Rapport des sexes, effort et succès de reproduction chez Rubus chamaemorus , plante herbacée vivace dioïque de distribution subarctique
title_fullStr Rapport des sexes, effort et succès de reproduction chez Rubus chamaemorus , plante herbacée vivace dioïque de distribution subarctique
title_full_unstemmed Rapport des sexes, effort et succès de reproduction chez Rubus chamaemorus , plante herbacée vivace dioïque de distribution subarctique
title_sort rapport des sexes, effort et succès de reproduction chez rubus chamaemorus , plante herbacée vivace dioïque de distribution subarctique
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 1987
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b87-354
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/b87-354
genre Rubus chamaemorus
Subarctic
subarctique*
genre_facet Rubus chamaemorus
Subarctic
subarctique*
op_source Canadian Journal of Botany
volume 65, issue 12, page 2628-2639
ISSN 0008-4026
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/b87-354
container_title Canadian Journal of Botany
container_volume 65
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2628
op_container_end_page 2639
_version_ 1785573741804126208