Modelling growing season carbon fluxes at a low-center polygon ecosystem in the Mackenzie River Delta

A temporal upscaling study was conducted to estimate net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of carbon dioxide and net methane exchange (NME) for a low-center polygon (LCP) ecosystem in the Mackenzie River Delta, for each of the 11 growing seasons (2009–2019). We used regression models to create a time series...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Science
Main Authors: Skeeter, June, Christen, Andreas, Henry, Greg
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/as-2022-0033
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/as-2022-0033
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/as-2022-0033
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/as-2022-0033
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/as-2022-0033 2023-12-17T10:22:42+01:00 Modelling growing season carbon fluxes at a low-center polygon ecosystem in the Mackenzie River Delta Skeeter, June Christen, Andreas Henry, Greg 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/as-2022-0033 https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/as-2022-0033 https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/as-2022-0033 en eng Canadian Science Publishing https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_GB Arctic Science ISSN 2368-7460 General Earth and Planetary Sciences General Agricultural and Biological Sciences General Environmental Science journal-article 2023 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2022-0033 2023-11-19T13:39:05Z A temporal upscaling study was conducted to estimate net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of carbon dioxide and net methane exchange (NME) for a low-center polygon (LCP) ecosystem in the Mackenzie River Delta, for each of the 11 growing seasons (2009–2019). We used regression models to create a time series of flux drivers from in situ weather observations (2009–2019) combined with ERA5 reanalysis and satellite data. We then used neural networks that were trained and validated on a single growing season (2017) of eddy covariance data to model NEE and NME over each growing season. The study indicates growing season NEE was negative (net uptake) and NME was positive (net emission) in this LCP ecosystem. Cumulative carbon (C) uptake was estimated to be −46.7 g C m −2 (CI 95% ± 45.3) per growing season, with methane emissions offsetting an average 5.6% of carbon dioxide uptake (in g C m −2 ) per growing season. High air temperatures (>15 °C) reduced daily CO 2 uptake and cumulative NEE was positively correlated with mean air growing season temperatures. Cumulative NME was positively correlated with the length of the growing season. Our analysis suggests warmer climate conditions may reduce carbon uptake in this LCP ecosystem. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Mackenzie river Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref) Mackenzie River Arctic Science
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic General Earth and Planetary Sciences
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
General Environmental Science
spellingShingle General Earth and Planetary Sciences
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
General Environmental Science
Skeeter, June
Christen, Andreas
Henry, Greg
Modelling growing season carbon fluxes at a low-center polygon ecosystem in the Mackenzie River Delta
topic_facet General Earth and Planetary Sciences
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
General Environmental Science
description A temporal upscaling study was conducted to estimate net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of carbon dioxide and net methane exchange (NME) for a low-center polygon (LCP) ecosystem in the Mackenzie River Delta, for each of the 11 growing seasons (2009–2019). We used regression models to create a time series of flux drivers from in situ weather observations (2009–2019) combined with ERA5 reanalysis and satellite data. We then used neural networks that were trained and validated on a single growing season (2017) of eddy covariance data to model NEE and NME over each growing season. The study indicates growing season NEE was negative (net uptake) and NME was positive (net emission) in this LCP ecosystem. Cumulative carbon (C) uptake was estimated to be −46.7 g C m −2 (CI 95% ± 45.3) per growing season, with methane emissions offsetting an average 5.6% of carbon dioxide uptake (in g C m −2 ) per growing season. High air temperatures (>15 °C) reduced daily CO 2 uptake and cumulative NEE was positively correlated with mean air growing season temperatures. Cumulative NME was positively correlated with the length of the growing season. Our analysis suggests warmer climate conditions may reduce carbon uptake in this LCP ecosystem.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Skeeter, June
Christen, Andreas
Henry, Greg
author_facet Skeeter, June
Christen, Andreas
Henry, Greg
author_sort Skeeter, June
title Modelling growing season carbon fluxes at a low-center polygon ecosystem in the Mackenzie River Delta
title_short Modelling growing season carbon fluxes at a low-center polygon ecosystem in the Mackenzie River Delta
title_full Modelling growing season carbon fluxes at a low-center polygon ecosystem in the Mackenzie River Delta
title_fullStr Modelling growing season carbon fluxes at a low-center polygon ecosystem in the Mackenzie River Delta
title_full_unstemmed Modelling growing season carbon fluxes at a low-center polygon ecosystem in the Mackenzie River Delta
title_sort modelling growing season carbon fluxes at a low-center polygon ecosystem in the mackenzie river delta
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/as-2022-0033
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/as-2022-0033
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/as-2022-0033
geographic Mackenzie River
geographic_facet Mackenzie River
genre Arctic
Mackenzie river
genre_facet Arctic
Mackenzie river
op_source Arctic Science
ISSN 2368-7460
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_GB
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2022-0033
container_title Arctic Science
_version_ 1785551420164931584