Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard

Natural regeneration after anthropogenic disturbance is slow in the tundra biome, but assisted regeneration can help speed up this process. A tracked off-road vehicle damaged a High Arctic dwarf shrub heath in Svalbard in May 2009, drastically reducing the vegetation cover, soil seed banks, and inco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arctic Science
Main Authors: Neby, Magne, Semenchuk, Philipp, Neby, Erica, Cooper, Elisabeth J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/as-2021-0016
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/as-2021-0016
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/as-2021-0016
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/as-2021-0016
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/as-2021-0016 2023-12-17T10:22:56+01:00 Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard Neby, Magne Semenchuk, Philipp Neby, Erica Cooper, Elisabeth J. 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/as-2021-0016 https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/as-2021-0016 https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/as-2021-0016 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Arctic Science volume 8, issue 3, page 1006-1025 ISSN 2368-7460 2368-7460 General Earth and Planetary Sciences General Agricultural and Biological Sciences General Environmental Science journal-article 2022 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2021-0016 2023-11-19T13:38:35Z Natural regeneration after anthropogenic disturbance is slow in the tundra biome, but assisted regeneration can help speed up this process. A tracked off-road vehicle damaged a High Arctic dwarf shrub heath in Svalbard in May 2009, drastically reducing the vegetation cover, soil seed banks, and incoming seed rain. We assisted regeneration the following year using six different revegetation treatments and monitored their effects one month, and one and eight years after their application. By 2018, all treatments still had lower vegetation cover and limited species composition than the undamaged reference vegetation. The fertiliser treatment was the most effective in restoring vegetation cover (71% vegetation cover, of which 62% were bryophytes and 38% were vascular plant species). Compared to the reference plots (98% vegetation cover, of which 32% were bryophytes and 66% were vascular plant species), the composition of the disturbed vegetation was still far from regenerated to its original state nine years after the tracks were made. The slow regrowth demonstrated in this study underlines the importance of avoiding the disturbance of fragile tundra and implementing and upholding regulations that restrict or ban such disturbances. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Svalbard Tundra Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref) Arctic Svalbard Arctic Science
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic General Earth and Planetary Sciences
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
General Environmental Science
spellingShingle General Earth and Planetary Sciences
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
General Environmental Science
Neby, Magne
Semenchuk, Philipp
Neby, Erica
Cooper, Elisabeth J.
Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard
topic_facet General Earth and Planetary Sciences
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
General Environmental Science
description Natural regeneration after anthropogenic disturbance is slow in the tundra biome, but assisted regeneration can help speed up this process. A tracked off-road vehicle damaged a High Arctic dwarf shrub heath in Svalbard in May 2009, drastically reducing the vegetation cover, soil seed banks, and incoming seed rain. We assisted regeneration the following year using six different revegetation treatments and monitored their effects one month, and one and eight years after their application. By 2018, all treatments still had lower vegetation cover and limited species composition than the undamaged reference vegetation. The fertiliser treatment was the most effective in restoring vegetation cover (71% vegetation cover, of which 62% were bryophytes and 38% were vascular plant species). Compared to the reference plots (98% vegetation cover, of which 32% were bryophytes and 66% were vascular plant species), the composition of the disturbed vegetation was still far from regenerated to its original state nine years after the tracks were made. The slow regrowth demonstrated in this study underlines the importance of avoiding the disturbance of fragile tundra and implementing and upholding regulations that restrict or ban such disturbances.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Neby, Magne
Semenchuk, Philipp
Neby, Erica
Cooper, Elisabeth J.
author_facet Neby, Magne
Semenchuk, Philipp
Neby, Erica
Cooper, Elisabeth J.
author_sort Neby, Magne
title Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard
title_short Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard
title_full Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard
title_fullStr Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in High Arctic tundra on Svalbard
title_sort comparison of methods for revegetation of vehicle tracks in high arctic tundra on svalbard
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/as-2021-0016
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1139/as-2021-0016
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/as-2021-0016
geographic Arctic
Svalbard
geographic_facet Arctic
Svalbard
genre Arctic
Arctic
Svalbard
Tundra
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Svalbard
Tundra
op_source Arctic Science
volume 8, issue 3, page 1006-1025
ISSN 2368-7460 2368-7460
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2021-0016
container_title Arctic Science
_version_ 1785554581549219840