Can eye surface temperature be used to indicate a stress response in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina)?

Abstract Infra-red thermography (IRT) is increasingly being used to estimate physiological stress responses in animals via changes in eye surface temperature. The aim of this study was to determine whether eye temperature of harbour seals ( Phoca vitulina ) changes in response to routine handling an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal Welfare
Main Authors: MacRae, AM, McGreevy, P, Daros, RR, Fraser, D
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.30.1.091
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0962728600009167
id crcambridgeupr:10.7120/09627286.30.1.091
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.7120/09627286.30.1.091 2024-09-09T20:03:31+00:00 Can eye surface temperature be used to indicate a stress response in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina)? MacRae, AM McGreevy, P Daros, RR Fraser, D 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.30.1.091 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0962728600009167 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Animal Welfare volume 30, issue 1, page 91-100 ISSN 0962-7286 2054-1538 journal-article 2021 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.30.1.091 2024-08-28T04:03:10Z Abstract Infra-red thermography (IRT) is increasingly being used to estimate physiological stress responses in animals via changes in eye surface temperature. The aim of this study was to determine whether eye temperature of harbour seals ( Phoca vitulina ) changes in response to routine handling and the potentially painful procedure of flipper-tagging, and if responses to tagging can be mitigated by subcutaneous injection of lidocaine. Orphaned pups (n = 52) at a rehabilitation facility were assigned to one of four treatments: Lidocaine (handled twice, once for injection and once for tagging); Saline (also handled twice); Tag Only (handled once); Sham Tag (handled once). Eye temperature increased more when pups were first handled compared to pups that were not handled and increased further in pups that underwent a second handling. Eye temperature of pups that were tagged without any previous treatment (Tag Only) increased compared to pups that were sham-tagged. Eye temperature also tended to increase after pups were injected with lidocaine but not saline. These results suggest that: (i) handling causes a physiological stress response; (ii) increased eye temperature arising from the second handling suggests the first handling was likely aversive, resulting in sensitisation to further handling; (iii) the rise in eye temperature after tagging, but not sham-tagging, may reflect pain from tagging; and (iv) lidocaine, at the dosage tested, did not appear to reduce the physiological response to tagging. These results show promise for the use of eye temperature to monitor stress responses and for evaluating the potential aversiveness of routine procedures in seals. Article in Journal/Newspaper Phoca vitulina Cambridge University Press Animal Welfare 30 1 91 100
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract Infra-red thermography (IRT) is increasingly being used to estimate physiological stress responses in animals via changes in eye surface temperature. The aim of this study was to determine whether eye temperature of harbour seals ( Phoca vitulina ) changes in response to routine handling and the potentially painful procedure of flipper-tagging, and if responses to tagging can be mitigated by subcutaneous injection of lidocaine. Orphaned pups (n = 52) at a rehabilitation facility were assigned to one of four treatments: Lidocaine (handled twice, once for injection and once for tagging); Saline (also handled twice); Tag Only (handled once); Sham Tag (handled once). Eye temperature increased more when pups were first handled compared to pups that were not handled and increased further in pups that underwent a second handling. Eye temperature of pups that were tagged without any previous treatment (Tag Only) increased compared to pups that were sham-tagged. Eye temperature also tended to increase after pups were injected with lidocaine but not saline. These results suggest that: (i) handling causes a physiological stress response; (ii) increased eye temperature arising from the second handling suggests the first handling was likely aversive, resulting in sensitisation to further handling; (iii) the rise in eye temperature after tagging, but not sham-tagging, may reflect pain from tagging; and (iv) lidocaine, at the dosage tested, did not appear to reduce the physiological response to tagging. These results show promise for the use of eye temperature to monitor stress responses and for evaluating the potential aversiveness of routine procedures in seals.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author MacRae, AM
McGreevy, P
Daros, RR
Fraser, D
spellingShingle MacRae, AM
McGreevy, P
Daros, RR
Fraser, D
Can eye surface temperature be used to indicate a stress response in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina)?
author_facet MacRae, AM
McGreevy, P
Daros, RR
Fraser, D
author_sort MacRae, AM
title Can eye surface temperature be used to indicate a stress response in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina)?
title_short Can eye surface temperature be used to indicate a stress response in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina)?
title_full Can eye surface temperature be used to indicate a stress response in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina)?
title_fullStr Can eye surface temperature be used to indicate a stress response in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina)?
title_full_unstemmed Can eye surface temperature be used to indicate a stress response in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina)?
title_sort can eye surface temperature be used to indicate a stress response in harbour seals (phoca vitulina)?
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.30.1.091
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0962728600009167
genre Phoca vitulina
genre_facet Phoca vitulina
op_source Animal Welfare
volume 30, issue 1, page 91-100
ISSN 0962-7286 2054-1538
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.30.1.091
container_title Animal Welfare
container_volume 30
container_issue 1
container_start_page 91
op_container_end_page 100
_version_ 1809935451477245952