Intertaxonomic Variability in Patterns of Bone Density and the Differential Representation of Bovid, Cervid, and Equid Elements in the Archaeological Record
Intertaxonomic differences in skeletal element representation in archaeological faunas may reflect preferences in the procurement, processing, transport, and/or consumption of these species by prehistoric foragers. However, the possibility that they also may result from preservational bias must be a...
Published in: | American Antiquity |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
1999
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2694283 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0002731600058686 |
id |
crcambridgeupr:10.2307/2694283 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crcambridgeupr:10.2307/2694283 2024-06-23T07:56:22+00:00 Intertaxonomic Variability in Patterns of Bone Density and the Differential Representation of Bovid, Cervid, and Equid Elements in the Archaeological Record Lam, Y. M. Chen, Xingbin Pearson, O. M. 1999 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2694283 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0002731600058686 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms American Antiquity volume 64, issue 2, page 343-362 ISSN 0002-7316 2325-5064 journal-article 1999 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.2307/2694283 2024-06-05T04:02:50Z Intertaxonomic differences in skeletal element representation in archaeological faunas may reflect preferences in the procurement, processing, transport, and/or consumption of these species by prehistoric foragers. However, the possibility that they also may result from preservational bias must be addressed before behavioral attributes of human hunters may be inferred. For example, at many archaeological sites, the remains of equids exhibit a different pattern of skeletal element representation than those of bovids and cervids. To evaluate the significance of such differences, this study examines intertaxonomic variability in patterns of bone density, the attribute most commonly employed as a proxy measure of resistance to destructive processes. Density data derived for a bovid ( Connachaetes taurinus ), a cervid ( Rangifer tarandus ), and two species of equid ( Equus burchelli and E. przewalskii ) exhibited very similar patterns, suggesting that values for one species may be used to interpret the survival patterns for other species of generally similar morphology. The differences in skeletal element representation between bovid, cervid, and equid species observed in archaeological faunas do not correspond with bone density and thus likely indicate selective treatment by human or other biotic agents. Article in Journal/Newspaper Rangifer tarandus Cambridge University Press American Antiquity 64 2 343 362 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Cambridge University Press |
op_collection_id |
crcambridgeupr |
language |
English |
description |
Intertaxonomic differences in skeletal element representation in archaeological faunas may reflect preferences in the procurement, processing, transport, and/or consumption of these species by prehistoric foragers. However, the possibility that they also may result from preservational bias must be addressed before behavioral attributes of human hunters may be inferred. For example, at many archaeological sites, the remains of equids exhibit a different pattern of skeletal element representation than those of bovids and cervids. To evaluate the significance of such differences, this study examines intertaxonomic variability in patterns of bone density, the attribute most commonly employed as a proxy measure of resistance to destructive processes. Density data derived for a bovid ( Connachaetes taurinus ), a cervid ( Rangifer tarandus ), and two species of equid ( Equus burchelli and E. przewalskii ) exhibited very similar patterns, suggesting that values for one species may be used to interpret the survival patterns for other species of generally similar morphology. The differences in skeletal element representation between bovid, cervid, and equid species observed in archaeological faunas do not correspond with bone density and thus likely indicate selective treatment by human or other biotic agents. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Lam, Y. M. Chen, Xingbin Pearson, O. M. |
spellingShingle |
Lam, Y. M. Chen, Xingbin Pearson, O. M. Intertaxonomic Variability in Patterns of Bone Density and the Differential Representation of Bovid, Cervid, and Equid Elements in the Archaeological Record |
author_facet |
Lam, Y. M. Chen, Xingbin Pearson, O. M. |
author_sort |
Lam, Y. M. |
title |
Intertaxonomic Variability in Patterns of Bone Density and the Differential Representation of Bovid, Cervid, and Equid Elements in the Archaeological Record |
title_short |
Intertaxonomic Variability in Patterns of Bone Density and the Differential Representation of Bovid, Cervid, and Equid Elements in the Archaeological Record |
title_full |
Intertaxonomic Variability in Patterns of Bone Density and the Differential Representation of Bovid, Cervid, and Equid Elements in the Archaeological Record |
title_fullStr |
Intertaxonomic Variability in Patterns of Bone Density and the Differential Representation of Bovid, Cervid, and Equid Elements in the Archaeological Record |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intertaxonomic Variability in Patterns of Bone Density and the Differential Representation of Bovid, Cervid, and Equid Elements in the Archaeological Record |
title_sort |
intertaxonomic variability in patterns of bone density and the differential representation of bovid, cervid, and equid elements in the archaeological record |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
publishDate |
1999 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2694283 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0002731600058686 |
genre |
Rangifer tarandus |
genre_facet |
Rangifer tarandus |
op_source |
American Antiquity volume 64, issue 2, page 343-362 ISSN 0002-7316 2325-5064 |
op_rights |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.2307/2694283 |
container_title |
American Antiquity |
container_volume |
64 |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
343 |
op_container_end_page |
362 |
_version_ |
1802649407572672512 |