The Postwar World Map: New States and Boundary Changes
A comparison of the postwar worlds of 1919 and 1948 indicates that the process of nation-building has moved from Europe to Asia. In the peace settlement after the First World War, the new states of the world appeared for the most part in Europe, but in the aftermath of the Second World War the new m...
Published in: | American Political Science Review |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
1948
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1949917 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0003055400058822 |
id |
crcambridgeupr:10.2307/1949917 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crcambridgeupr:10.2307/1949917 2024-09-30T14:37:28+00:00 The Postwar World Map: New States and Boundary Changes Fifield, Russell H. 1948 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1949917 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0003055400058822 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms American Political Science Review volume 42, issue 3, page 533-541 ISSN 0003-0554 1537-5943 journal-article 1948 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.2307/1949917 2024-09-04T04:04:05Z A comparison of the postwar worlds of 1919 and 1948 indicates that the process of nation-building has moved from Europe to Asia. In the peace settlement after the First World War, the new states of the world appeared for the most part in Europe, but in the aftermath of the Second World War the new members of the family of nations come almost entirely from Asia. In Europe, three of the states that emerged from the First World War—Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania—have lost their national existence and are now numbered among the sixteen republics of the Soviet Union. The only new state from a practical viewpoint to appear in the European firmament is Iceland, which dissolved the personal union of a common king with Denmark dating from November 30, 1918, and became a sovereign republic on June 17, 1944. An even exchange may be noted in the incorporation by Poland of the Free City of Danzig, once under the protection of the League of Nations and in the creation of the Free Territory of Trieste under the protection of the Security Council of the United Nations. Although classification is difficult, the new states or near states of Asia fall roughly into a fourfold pattern: independence with partition, independence without partition, de facto or promised independence, and emergence from isolation into the family of nations. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Cambridge University Press American Political Science Review 42 3 533 541 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Cambridge University Press |
op_collection_id |
crcambridgeupr |
language |
English |
description |
A comparison of the postwar worlds of 1919 and 1948 indicates that the process of nation-building has moved from Europe to Asia. In the peace settlement after the First World War, the new states of the world appeared for the most part in Europe, but in the aftermath of the Second World War the new members of the family of nations come almost entirely from Asia. In Europe, three of the states that emerged from the First World War—Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania—have lost their national existence and are now numbered among the sixteen republics of the Soviet Union. The only new state from a practical viewpoint to appear in the European firmament is Iceland, which dissolved the personal union of a common king with Denmark dating from November 30, 1918, and became a sovereign republic on June 17, 1944. An even exchange may be noted in the incorporation by Poland of the Free City of Danzig, once under the protection of the League of Nations and in the creation of the Free Territory of Trieste under the protection of the Security Council of the United Nations. Although classification is difficult, the new states or near states of Asia fall roughly into a fourfold pattern: independence with partition, independence without partition, de facto or promised independence, and emergence from isolation into the family of nations. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Fifield, Russell H. |
spellingShingle |
Fifield, Russell H. The Postwar World Map: New States and Boundary Changes |
author_facet |
Fifield, Russell H. |
author_sort |
Fifield, Russell H. |
title |
The Postwar World Map: New States and Boundary Changes |
title_short |
The Postwar World Map: New States and Boundary Changes |
title_full |
The Postwar World Map: New States and Boundary Changes |
title_fullStr |
The Postwar World Map: New States and Boundary Changes |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Postwar World Map: New States and Boundary Changes |
title_sort |
postwar world map: new states and boundary changes |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
publishDate |
1948 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1949917 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0003055400058822 |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_source |
American Political Science Review volume 42, issue 3, page 533-541 ISSN 0003-0554 1537-5943 |
op_rights |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.2307/1949917 |
container_title |
American Political Science Review |
container_volume |
42 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
533 |
op_container_end_page |
541 |
_version_ |
1811640311707860992 |