The Pattern of Electoral Rules in the United States: a Deviant Case among the Industralized Democracies

THE UNITED STATES IS THE WORLD'S SECOND LARGEST DEMOcracy (after India) and the largest of the older well-established democracies, with a very long and uninterrupted history of free elections. For this reason, it can be argued that the American democratic example has been and, should be an impo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Government and Opposition
Main Author: Lijphart, Arend
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1985
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1985.tb01065.x
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0017257X00010484
id crcambridgeupr:10.1111/j.1477-7053.1985.tb01065.x
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1111/j.1477-7053.1985.tb01065.x 2023-05-15T16:51:19+02:00 The Pattern of Electoral Rules in the United States: a Deviant Case among the Industralized Democracies Lijphart, Arend 1985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1985.tb01065.x https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0017257X00010484 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Government and Opposition volume 20, issue 1, page 18-28 ISSN 0017-257X 1477-7053 Public Administration Sociology and Political Science journal-article 1985 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1985.tb01065.x 2022-04-07T08:02:07Z THE UNITED STATES IS THE WORLD'S SECOND LARGEST DEMOcracy (after India) and the largest of the older well-established democracies, with a very long and uninterrupted history of free elections. For this reason, it can be argued that the American democratic example has been and, should be an important model for other countries to follow. This article will focus on one important aspect of the American democratic system - the pattern of electoral rules - and it will emphasize the striking differences between the American electoral process and that of most other democracies. This contrast obviously affects the applicability of the American model to other countries that may be in the process of revising their electoral rules: because the United States is a deviant case in almost all respects, it presents clear alternatives to the more common attern but also dternatives that are so radical that they may ge difficult to transplant. The democracies with which the American pattern of electoral systems will be compared and contrasted are the 20 countries which, Me the United States, have been democratic without interruption for a relatively long time, that is, since approximately the end of the Second world War: the four large West European countries (Great Britain, France, West Germany, and Italy), the five Nordic countries (Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, and Iceland), the Benelux countries (the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg), Ireland, Switzerland, Austria, and five countries outside Europe (Canada, Israel, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand). Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Cambridge University Press (via Crossref) Canada New Zealand Norway Government and Opposition 20 1 18 28
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Public Administration
Sociology and Political Science
spellingShingle Public Administration
Sociology and Political Science
Lijphart, Arend
The Pattern of Electoral Rules in the United States: a Deviant Case among the Industralized Democracies
topic_facet Public Administration
Sociology and Political Science
description THE UNITED STATES IS THE WORLD'S SECOND LARGEST DEMOcracy (after India) and the largest of the older well-established democracies, with a very long and uninterrupted history of free elections. For this reason, it can be argued that the American democratic example has been and, should be an important model for other countries to follow. This article will focus on one important aspect of the American democratic system - the pattern of electoral rules - and it will emphasize the striking differences between the American electoral process and that of most other democracies. This contrast obviously affects the applicability of the American model to other countries that may be in the process of revising their electoral rules: because the United States is a deviant case in almost all respects, it presents clear alternatives to the more common attern but also dternatives that are so radical that they may ge difficult to transplant. The democracies with which the American pattern of electoral systems will be compared and contrasted are the 20 countries which, Me the United States, have been democratic without interruption for a relatively long time, that is, since approximately the end of the Second world War: the four large West European countries (Great Britain, France, West Germany, and Italy), the five Nordic countries (Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, and Iceland), the Benelux countries (the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg), Ireland, Switzerland, Austria, and five countries outside Europe (Canada, Israel, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand).
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lijphart, Arend
author_facet Lijphart, Arend
author_sort Lijphart, Arend
title The Pattern of Electoral Rules in the United States: a Deviant Case among the Industralized Democracies
title_short The Pattern of Electoral Rules in the United States: a Deviant Case among the Industralized Democracies
title_full The Pattern of Electoral Rules in the United States: a Deviant Case among the Industralized Democracies
title_fullStr The Pattern of Electoral Rules in the United States: a Deviant Case among the Industralized Democracies
title_full_unstemmed The Pattern of Electoral Rules in the United States: a Deviant Case among the Industralized Democracies
title_sort pattern of electoral rules in the united states: a deviant case among the industralized democracies
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1985
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1985.tb01065.x
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0017257X00010484
geographic Canada
New Zealand
Norway
geographic_facet Canada
New Zealand
Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Government and Opposition
volume 20, issue 1, page 18-28
ISSN 0017-257X 1477-7053
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1985.tb01065.x
container_title Government and Opposition
container_volume 20
container_issue 1
container_start_page 18
op_container_end_page 28
_version_ 1766041429085257728