Ediacaran survivors

Ediacaran taxa are a characteristic element of latest Precambrian biotas, with an effectively global distribution. Their time range is not well understood, but with one possible exception from western Canada Ediacaran faunas appear always to post-date the late Precambrian glaciations. There is also...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Paleontological Society Special Publications
Main Author: Conway Morris, Simon
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1992
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2475262200006298
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S2475262200006298
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s2475262200006298
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s2475262200006298 2023-05-15T18:43:57+02:00 Ediacaran survivors Conway Morris, Simon 1992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2475262200006298 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S2475262200006298 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms The Paleontological Society Special Publications volume 6, page 69-69 ISSN 2475-2622 2475-2681 journal-article 1992 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s2475262200006298 2022-04-07T09:00:28Z Ediacaran taxa are a characteristic element of latest Precambrian biotas, with an effectively global distribution. Their time range is not well understood, but with one possible exception from western Canada Ediacaran faunas appear always to post-date the late Precambrian glaciations. There is also growing evidence that many Ediacaran taxa disappeared before the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary. These disappearances traditionally have been ascribed to changes in taphonomic circumstances, but a series of extinctions is a plausible alternative. Ediacaran fossils pose two major problems: Notwithstanding the reasons for their disappearance shortly before the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary, was their demise total or did some forms persist into the Cambrian? Second, is the traditional view that Ediacaran taxa are metazoans, many of a cnidarian grade, correct? Recently Seilacher, Bergström and others have argued that the Ediacaran organisms have a distinctive bauplan, difficult to reconcile with known phyla and possibly different from any metazoan. In the Cambrian, Burgess Shale-type faunas are the principal source of information on soft-bodied metazoans. The differences between them and Ediacaran assemblages are largely self-evident, but there is now unequivocal evidence for at least one Ediacaran survivor from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia. This is a sea-pen-like animal, known from three specimens (one adult about 20 cm in length, and two juveniles). The fossils consist of a broad frond, with branches arising from a central axis on one side, while the opposite side is smooth apart from longitudinal ridges. The frond extends into a blunt holdfast that presumably was embedded in the muddy silt of the sea floor. This fossil is strikingly similar to the Ediacaran taxon Charniodiscus , best known from South Australia. The Burgess Shale example shows two important features. The first are pustule-like structures, possibly zooids, both on the branches and adjacent to the axis. The second feature is evidence for connections between the branches and axis, possibly representing canals. These features both support a comparison with extant pennatulaceans, and suggest that at least some Ediacaran taxa are correctly assigned to the metazoans. Also occurring in the Burgess Shale is an enigmatic bag-like organism Mackenzia costalis . Clear evidence exists for it being benthic, but its mode of feeding is uncertain. The interior appears to have consisted largely of a spacious cavity, probably sub-divided by longitudinal partitions. In addition, an elongate strand may represent a discrete organ, perhaps connected with digestion or reproduction. No exact equivalent to Mackenzia appears to occur in Ediacaran assemblages, but bag-like taxa are a common component. These include erniettids, best known from Namibia, and Platypholina , from the White Sea region of Russia. Article in Journal/Newspaper White Sea Cambridge University Press (via Crossref) British Columbia ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000) Burgess ENVELOPE(76.128,76.128,-69.415,-69.415) Canada Holdfast ENVELOPE(-66.590,-66.590,-66.803,-66.803) White Sea The Paleontological Society Special Publications 6 69 69
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Ediacaran taxa are a characteristic element of latest Precambrian biotas, with an effectively global distribution. Their time range is not well understood, but with one possible exception from western Canada Ediacaran faunas appear always to post-date the late Precambrian glaciations. There is also growing evidence that many Ediacaran taxa disappeared before the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary. These disappearances traditionally have been ascribed to changes in taphonomic circumstances, but a series of extinctions is a plausible alternative. Ediacaran fossils pose two major problems: Notwithstanding the reasons for their disappearance shortly before the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary, was their demise total or did some forms persist into the Cambrian? Second, is the traditional view that Ediacaran taxa are metazoans, many of a cnidarian grade, correct? Recently Seilacher, Bergström and others have argued that the Ediacaran organisms have a distinctive bauplan, difficult to reconcile with known phyla and possibly different from any metazoan. In the Cambrian, Burgess Shale-type faunas are the principal source of information on soft-bodied metazoans. The differences between them and Ediacaran assemblages are largely self-evident, but there is now unequivocal evidence for at least one Ediacaran survivor from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia. This is a sea-pen-like animal, known from three specimens (one adult about 20 cm in length, and two juveniles). The fossils consist of a broad frond, with branches arising from a central axis on one side, while the opposite side is smooth apart from longitudinal ridges. The frond extends into a blunt holdfast that presumably was embedded in the muddy silt of the sea floor. This fossil is strikingly similar to the Ediacaran taxon Charniodiscus , best known from South Australia. The Burgess Shale example shows two important features. The first are pustule-like structures, possibly zooids, both on the branches and adjacent to the axis. The second feature is evidence for connections between the branches and axis, possibly representing canals. These features both support a comparison with extant pennatulaceans, and suggest that at least some Ediacaran taxa are correctly assigned to the metazoans. Also occurring in the Burgess Shale is an enigmatic bag-like organism Mackenzia costalis . Clear evidence exists for it being benthic, but its mode of feeding is uncertain. The interior appears to have consisted largely of a spacious cavity, probably sub-divided by longitudinal partitions. In addition, an elongate strand may represent a discrete organ, perhaps connected with digestion or reproduction. No exact equivalent to Mackenzia appears to occur in Ediacaran assemblages, but bag-like taxa are a common component. These include erniettids, best known from Namibia, and Platypholina , from the White Sea region of Russia.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Conway Morris, Simon
spellingShingle Conway Morris, Simon
Ediacaran survivors
author_facet Conway Morris, Simon
author_sort Conway Morris, Simon
title Ediacaran survivors
title_short Ediacaran survivors
title_full Ediacaran survivors
title_fullStr Ediacaran survivors
title_full_unstemmed Ediacaran survivors
title_sort ediacaran survivors
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1992
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2475262200006298
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S2475262200006298
long_lat ENVELOPE(-125.003,-125.003,54.000,54.000)
ENVELOPE(76.128,76.128,-69.415,-69.415)
ENVELOPE(-66.590,-66.590,-66.803,-66.803)
geographic British Columbia
Burgess
Canada
Holdfast
White Sea
geographic_facet British Columbia
Burgess
Canada
Holdfast
White Sea
genre White Sea
genre_facet White Sea
op_source The Paleontological Society Special Publications
volume 6, page 69-69
ISSN 2475-2622 2475-2681
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s2475262200006298
container_title The Paleontological Society Special Publications
container_volume 6
container_start_page 69
op_container_end_page 69
_version_ 1766234487423762432