Shell-crushing by two duck species, Tadorna tadorna and Somateria mollissima in the Wadden Sea. Paleoecologic implications

Shell fragments from faeces of the mollusc-eating eider ( Somatera mollissima ) and shelduck ( Tadorna tadorna ) were studied in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Both species crush shells internally in their gizzard. Shelducks feed mainly on the small gastropod Hydrobia ulvae , which they do not always succeed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Paleontological Society Special Publications
Main Author: Cadee, Gerhard C
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1992
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2475262200006080
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S2475262200006080
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s2475262200006080
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s2475262200006080 2023-05-15T18:20:27+02:00 Shell-crushing by two duck species, Tadorna tadorna and Somateria mollissima in the Wadden Sea. Paleoecologic implications Cadee, Gerhard C 1992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2475262200006080 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S2475262200006080 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms The Paleontological Society Special Publications volume 6, page 48-48 ISSN 2475-2622 2475-2681 journal-article 1992 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s2475262200006080 2022-04-07T09:02:28Z Shell fragments from faeces of the mollusc-eating eider ( Somatera mollissima ) and shelduck ( Tadorna tadorna ) were studied in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Both species crush shells internally in their gizzard. Shelducks feed mainly on the small gastropod Hydrobia ulvae , which they do not always succeed in breaking: in some cases even surviving Hydrobia were collected from the faeces. This indicates that shelduck may help dispersion of Hydrobia and that not only Hydrobia fragments but also intact empty shells are contributed to the sediment by this predator. Eiders feed mainly on mussels ( Mytilus edulis ) and cockles ( Cerastoderma edule ). When these are scarce, they take shorecrabs or the gastropod Littorina littorea . Their crushing method is usually successful; only some Littorina shells were found intact but not alive in their faeces. Shells are crushed to fragments ranging from less than 0.1 to 8 mm, with a peak in the 2 – 4 mm size fraction, 20% was < 1 mm. Annual shell carbonate production in the Dutch Wadden Sea is ca 150.000 tonnes. The annual average number of eiders is 63.000 with a maximum of up to 200.000 in winter. Annually they consume 3200 tonnes meat (ash-free dryweight). If they fed fifty/fifty on mussels and cockles they would produce ca 75.000 tonnes shell-fragments. As they feed partly on non-molluscan food this is an upper limit, but it implies that they are the main producers of shell-fragments (of all sizes, even the smallest) in the Wadden Sea. The typically square shell-fragments they produce, are easily recognisable in Wadden Sea sediments. Others predators (shorecrabs, shrimps, flatfish, other mollusc-eating birds like knot and curlew) produce additional shell-fragments. However, some predators e.g. seastars ( Asterias rubens ) leave intact the shells they consumed. Shell-fragments in sediments, therefore, may give an indication of predation pressure, but as non-crushed shells may be left over by some predators, total predation pressure on molluscs cannot be estimated in fossil faunas. Article in Journal/Newspaper Somateria mollissima Cambridge University Press (via Crossref) The Paleontological Society Special Publications 6 48 48
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Shell fragments from faeces of the mollusc-eating eider ( Somatera mollissima ) and shelduck ( Tadorna tadorna ) were studied in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Both species crush shells internally in their gizzard. Shelducks feed mainly on the small gastropod Hydrobia ulvae , which they do not always succeed in breaking: in some cases even surviving Hydrobia were collected from the faeces. This indicates that shelduck may help dispersion of Hydrobia and that not only Hydrobia fragments but also intact empty shells are contributed to the sediment by this predator. Eiders feed mainly on mussels ( Mytilus edulis ) and cockles ( Cerastoderma edule ). When these are scarce, they take shorecrabs or the gastropod Littorina littorea . Their crushing method is usually successful; only some Littorina shells were found intact but not alive in their faeces. Shells are crushed to fragments ranging from less than 0.1 to 8 mm, with a peak in the 2 – 4 mm size fraction, 20% was < 1 mm. Annual shell carbonate production in the Dutch Wadden Sea is ca 150.000 tonnes. The annual average number of eiders is 63.000 with a maximum of up to 200.000 in winter. Annually they consume 3200 tonnes meat (ash-free dryweight). If they fed fifty/fifty on mussels and cockles they would produce ca 75.000 tonnes shell-fragments. As they feed partly on non-molluscan food this is an upper limit, but it implies that they are the main producers of shell-fragments (of all sizes, even the smallest) in the Wadden Sea. The typically square shell-fragments they produce, are easily recognisable in Wadden Sea sediments. Others predators (shorecrabs, shrimps, flatfish, other mollusc-eating birds like knot and curlew) produce additional shell-fragments. However, some predators e.g. seastars ( Asterias rubens ) leave intact the shells they consumed. Shell-fragments in sediments, therefore, may give an indication of predation pressure, but as non-crushed shells may be left over by some predators, total predation pressure on molluscs cannot be estimated in fossil faunas.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cadee, Gerhard C
spellingShingle Cadee, Gerhard C
Shell-crushing by two duck species, Tadorna tadorna and Somateria mollissima in the Wadden Sea. Paleoecologic implications
author_facet Cadee, Gerhard C
author_sort Cadee, Gerhard C
title Shell-crushing by two duck species, Tadorna tadorna and Somateria mollissima in the Wadden Sea. Paleoecologic implications
title_short Shell-crushing by two duck species, Tadorna tadorna and Somateria mollissima in the Wadden Sea. Paleoecologic implications
title_full Shell-crushing by two duck species, Tadorna tadorna and Somateria mollissima in the Wadden Sea. Paleoecologic implications
title_fullStr Shell-crushing by two duck species, Tadorna tadorna and Somateria mollissima in the Wadden Sea. Paleoecologic implications
title_full_unstemmed Shell-crushing by two duck species, Tadorna tadorna and Somateria mollissima in the Wadden Sea. Paleoecologic implications
title_sort shell-crushing by two duck species, tadorna tadorna and somateria mollissima in the wadden sea. paleoecologic implications
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1992
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2475262200006080
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S2475262200006080
genre Somateria mollissima
genre_facet Somateria mollissima
op_source The Paleontological Society Special Publications
volume 6, page 48-48
ISSN 2475-2622 2475-2681
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s2475262200006080
container_title The Paleontological Society Special Publications
container_volume 6
container_start_page 48
op_container_end_page 48
_version_ 1766197982590402560