Discovery Rights and the Arctic

Abstract This article examines whether discovery could, contrary to common philosophical opinion, be taken seriously as a ground of territorial rights. I focus on the discovery of uninhabitable lands such as found in the Arctic. After surveying the role of discovery in Roman private law and modern i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Theory
Main Author: Schwartz, Daniel
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1752971919000174
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S1752971919000174
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s1752971919000174
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s1752971919000174 2024-09-09T19:21:54+00:00 Discovery Rights and the Arctic Schwartz, Daniel 2019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1752971919000174 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S1752971919000174 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms International Theory volume 12, issue 3, page 387-407 ISSN 1752-9719 1752-9727 journal-article 2019 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s1752971919000174 2024-07-31T04:03:23Z Abstract This article examines whether discovery could, contrary to common philosophical opinion, be taken seriously as a ground of territorial rights. I focus on the discovery of uninhabitable lands such as found in the Arctic. After surveying the role of discovery in Roman private law and modern international law, I turn to Locke's well-known theory or original acquisition. I argue that many of the justifications that do the work in Locke's theory also apply to discovery. I then discuss some of the many reasons why discovery may seem unpromising as a ground of original acquisition. I close by arguing that if there is a bridge mechanism by which property can legitimately transform into territory and if, at least in some circumstances, discovery can produce property rights, then it would follow that in some circumstances discovery could also produce territorial rights. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Cambridge University Press Arctic International Theory 12 3 387 407
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract This article examines whether discovery could, contrary to common philosophical opinion, be taken seriously as a ground of territorial rights. I focus on the discovery of uninhabitable lands such as found in the Arctic. After surveying the role of discovery in Roman private law and modern international law, I turn to Locke's well-known theory or original acquisition. I argue that many of the justifications that do the work in Locke's theory also apply to discovery. I then discuss some of the many reasons why discovery may seem unpromising as a ground of original acquisition. I close by arguing that if there is a bridge mechanism by which property can legitimately transform into territory and if, at least in some circumstances, discovery can produce property rights, then it would follow that in some circumstances discovery could also produce territorial rights.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Schwartz, Daniel
spellingShingle Schwartz, Daniel
Discovery Rights and the Arctic
author_facet Schwartz, Daniel
author_sort Schwartz, Daniel
title Discovery Rights and the Arctic
title_short Discovery Rights and the Arctic
title_full Discovery Rights and the Arctic
title_fullStr Discovery Rights and the Arctic
title_full_unstemmed Discovery Rights and the Arctic
title_sort discovery rights and the arctic
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2019
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1752971919000174
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S1752971919000174
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source International Theory
volume 12, issue 3, page 387-407
ISSN 1752-9719 1752-9727
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s1752971919000174
container_title International Theory
container_volume 12
container_issue 3
container_start_page 387
op_container_end_page 407
_version_ 1809762189436780544