A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. Swans and other beings in the Mesolithic

Abstract Recent, non-anthropocentric explorations of the interaction between human and non-human animals have resulted in many groundbreaking studies. In this ‘animal turn’, zooarchaeology, which deals with and has access to the material traces of animals that existed alongside humans over the last...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archaeological Dialogues
Main Authors: Overton, Nick J., Hamilakis, Yannis
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1380203813000159
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S1380203813000159
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s1380203813000159
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s1380203813000159 2024-06-23T07:57:25+00:00 A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. Swans and other beings in the Mesolithic Overton, Nick J. Hamilakis, Yannis 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1380203813000159 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S1380203813000159 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Archaeological Dialogues volume 20, issue 2, page 111-136 ISSN 1380-2038 1478-2294 journal-article 2013 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s1380203813000159 2024-05-29T08:07:51Z Abstract Recent, non-anthropocentric explorations of the interaction between human and non-human animals have resulted in many groundbreaking studies. In this ‘animal turn’, zooarchaeology, which deals with and has access to the material traces of animals that existed alongside humans over the last 2.5 million years, could occupy a privileged and influential position. Despite some encouraging efforts, however, zooarchaeology's ability to contribute to these discussions is heavily limited by the subdiscipline's firm footing within anthropocentric ontologies and reductionist epistemologies. This paper outlines a framework for a new social zooarchaeology that moves beyond the paradigm and discourse of ‘subsistence’ and of representationist and dichotomous thinking, which have treated non-human animals merely and often exclusively as nutritional or symbolic resources for the benefit of humans. Building on alternative zoontologies which reinstate the position of non-human animals as sentient and autonomous agents, this framework foregrounds the intercorporeal, sensuous and affective engagements through which humans and non-human animals are mutually constituted. These ideas are illustrated with two case studies focusing on human–whooper swan interactions in the Danish Later Mesolithic, based on the faunal assemblage from the site of Aggersund in North Jutland, and the whooper swan remains found associated with the Grave 8 at Vedbæk. Article in Journal/Newspaper Whooper Swan Cambridge University Press Archaeological Dialogues 20 2 111 136
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract Recent, non-anthropocentric explorations of the interaction between human and non-human animals have resulted in many groundbreaking studies. In this ‘animal turn’, zooarchaeology, which deals with and has access to the material traces of animals that existed alongside humans over the last 2.5 million years, could occupy a privileged and influential position. Despite some encouraging efforts, however, zooarchaeology's ability to contribute to these discussions is heavily limited by the subdiscipline's firm footing within anthropocentric ontologies and reductionist epistemologies. This paper outlines a framework for a new social zooarchaeology that moves beyond the paradigm and discourse of ‘subsistence’ and of representationist and dichotomous thinking, which have treated non-human animals merely and often exclusively as nutritional or symbolic resources for the benefit of humans. Building on alternative zoontologies which reinstate the position of non-human animals as sentient and autonomous agents, this framework foregrounds the intercorporeal, sensuous and affective engagements through which humans and non-human animals are mutually constituted. These ideas are illustrated with two case studies focusing on human–whooper swan interactions in the Danish Later Mesolithic, based on the faunal assemblage from the site of Aggersund in North Jutland, and the whooper swan remains found associated with the Grave 8 at Vedbæk.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Overton, Nick J.
Hamilakis, Yannis
spellingShingle Overton, Nick J.
Hamilakis, Yannis
A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. Swans and other beings in the Mesolithic
author_facet Overton, Nick J.
Hamilakis, Yannis
author_sort Overton, Nick J.
title A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. Swans and other beings in the Mesolithic
title_short A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. Swans and other beings in the Mesolithic
title_full A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. Swans and other beings in the Mesolithic
title_fullStr A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. Swans and other beings in the Mesolithic
title_full_unstemmed A manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. Swans and other beings in the Mesolithic
title_sort manifesto for a social zooarchaeology. swans and other beings in the mesolithic
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2013
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1380203813000159
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S1380203813000159
genre Whooper Swan
genre_facet Whooper Swan
op_source Archaeological Dialogues
volume 20, issue 2, page 111-136
ISSN 1380-2038 1478-2294
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s1380203813000159
container_title Archaeological Dialogues
container_volume 20
container_issue 2
container_start_page 111
op_container_end_page 136
_version_ 1802651045397004288