Evaluation of the tranquilliser trap device (TTD) for improving the humaneness of dingo trapping

Abstract Predation of sheep and cattle by the dingo ( Canis lupus dingo ) is implicated in significant stock losses throughout much of mainland Australia. Leg-hold traps are commonly used for dingo control and ways are sought to improve the humaneness of these devices. We evaluated the performance o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal Welfare
Main Authors: Marks, CA, Allen, L, Gigliotti, F, Busana, F, Gonzalez, T, Lindeman, M, Fisher, PM
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600028645
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0962728600028645
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0962728600028645
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0962728600028645 2024-09-15T18:01:27+00:00 Evaluation of the tranquilliser trap device (TTD) for improving the humaneness of dingo trapping Marks, CA Allen, L Gigliotti, F Busana, F Gonzalez, T Lindeman, M Fisher, PM 2004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600028645 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0962728600028645 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Animal Welfare volume 13, issue 4, page 393-399 ISSN 0962-7286 2054-1538 journal-article 2004 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600028645 2024-08-07T04:01:36Z Abstract Predation of sheep and cattle by the dingo ( Canis lupus dingo ) is implicated in significant stock losses throughout much of mainland Australia. Leg-hold traps are commonly used for dingo control and ways are sought to improve the humaneness of these devices. We evaluated the performance of the tranquilliser trap device (TTD) attached to Victor Soft-Catch ® traps for their ability to deliver a sedative and anxiolytic drug to trapped dingoes. A trapping programme was conducted in south-west Queensland where traps were set alternatively with a TTD containing either 800 mg of diazepam (drug TTD) or a placebo (placebo TTD). All TTDs included 20 mg of the bait marker iophenoxic acid (IPA) to ascertain dosing success. Each trap was fitted with an activity-monitoring data logger that recorded time of capture and subsequent dingo activity. In 41 out of 48 (85.4%) captures the TTD was ruptured and released its contents. No elevation in serum iodine levels above I mg ml -1 resulting from the ingestion of IPA occurred in 8 out of 36 (22.2%) captures, which suggests a higher rate of dosage failure. Dingo activity was highest in both groups immediately after capture, but declined after the first hour in each. The activity of dingoes that accepted a drug TTD was significantly reduced compared to those that took the placebo. However, tooth and limb damage scores did not differ significantly between the drug and placebo group. Much of the physical trauma may have occurred within the first hour of capture when activity was intense and before drug onset in the TTD drug group. The use of TTDs containing sedative and anxiolytic drugs has the potential to reduce anxiety and distress associated with prolonged captivity, but the delivery of a lethal agent that is rapidly acting and humane may result in better welfare outcomes. Article in Journal/Newspaper Canis lupus Cambridge University Press Animal Welfare 13 4 393 399
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract Predation of sheep and cattle by the dingo ( Canis lupus dingo ) is implicated in significant stock losses throughout much of mainland Australia. Leg-hold traps are commonly used for dingo control and ways are sought to improve the humaneness of these devices. We evaluated the performance of the tranquilliser trap device (TTD) attached to Victor Soft-Catch ® traps for their ability to deliver a sedative and anxiolytic drug to trapped dingoes. A trapping programme was conducted in south-west Queensland where traps were set alternatively with a TTD containing either 800 mg of diazepam (drug TTD) or a placebo (placebo TTD). All TTDs included 20 mg of the bait marker iophenoxic acid (IPA) to ascertain dosing success. Each trap was fitted with an activity-monitoring data logger that recorded time of capture and subsequent dingo activity. In 41 out of 48 (85.4%) captures the TTD was ruptured and released its contents. No elevation in serum iodine levels above I mg ml -1 resulting from the ingestion of IPA occurred in 8 out of 36 (22.2%) captures, which suggests a higher rate of dosage failure. Dingo activity was highest in both groups immediately after capture, but declined after the first hour in each. The activity of dingoes that accepted a drug TTD was significantly reduced compared to those that took the placebo. However, tooth and limb damage scores did not differ significantly between the drug and placebo group. Much of the physical trauma may have occurred within the first hour of capture when activity was intense and before drug onset in the TTD drug group. The use of TTDs containing sedative and anxiolytic drugs has the potential to reduce anxiety and distress associated with prolonged captivity, but the delivery of a lethal agent that is rapidly acting and humane may result in better welfare outcomes.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Marks, CA
Allen, L
Gigliotti, F
Busana, F
Gonzalez, T
Lindeman, M
Fisher, PM
spellingShingle Marks, CA
Allen, L
Gigliotti, F
Busana, F
Gonzalez, T
Lindeman, M
Fisher, PM
Evaluation of the tranquilliser trap device (TTD) for improving the humaneness of dingo trapping
author_facet Marks, CA
Allen, L
Gigliotti, F
Busana, F
Gonzalez, T
Lindeman, M
Fisher, PM
author_sort Marks, CA
title Evaluation of the tranquilliser trap device (TTD) for improving the humaneness of dingo trapping
title_short Evaluation of the tranquilliser trap device (TTD) for improving the humaneness of dingo trapping
title_full Evaluation of the tranquilliser trap device (TTD) for improving the humaneness of dingo trapping
title_fullStr Evaluation of the tranquilliser trap device (TTD) for improving the humaneness of dingo trapping
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the tranquilliser trap device (TTD) for improving the humaneness of dingo trapping
title_sort evaluation of the tranquilliser trap device (ttd) for improving the humaneness of dingo trapping
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2004
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600028645
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0962728600028645
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_source Animal Welfare
volume 13, issue 4, page 393-399
ISSN 0962-7286 2054-1538
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600028645
container_title Animal Welfare
container_volume 13
container_issue 4
container_start_page 393
op_container_end_page 399
_version_ 1810438599663943680