Factors associated with hare mortality during coursing

Abstract Hare coursing is a widespread but controversial activity. In an attempt to reduce hare mortality and mitigate the activity's impact on hare welfare, the Irish Coursing Club introduced measures including the compulsory muzzling of dogs in 1993. However, the efficacy of these measures re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal Welfare
Main Authors: Reid, N, McDonald, RA, Montgomery, WI
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600027366
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0962728600027366
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0962728600027366
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0962728600027366 2023-07-02T03:32:53+02:00 Factors associated with hare mortality during coursing Reid, N McDonald, RA Montgomery, WI 2007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600027366 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0962728600027366 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Animal Welfare volume 16, issue 4, page 427-434 ISSN 0962-7286 2054-1538 General Veterinary General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Animal Science and Zoology journal-article 2007 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600027366 2023-06-15T21:47:50Z Abstract Hare coursing is a widespread but controversial activity. In an attempt to reduce hare mortality and mitigate the activity's impact on hare welfare, the Irish Coursing Club introduced measures including the compulsory muzzling of dogs in 1993. However, the efficacy of these measures remained the subject of heated debate. Official records, corroborated by independent video evidence, were used to assess the fate of individual Irish hares (Lepus timidus hibernicus) during coursing events from 1988-2004. Muzzling dogs significantly reduced levels of hare mortality. In courses using unmuzzled dogs from 1988/89-1992/93 mean hare mortality was 15.8%, compared to 4.1% in courses using muzzled dogs from 1993/94-2003/04. Further reductions in mortality could not be accounted for by muzzling dogs, supporting the efficacy of other factors such as improved hare husbandry. The duration of the head start given to the hare prior to the release of the dogs significantly affected the outcome of the course. Hares that were killed had head starts of greater duration than those that were chased but survived, suggesting the former may have been slower. The selection of hares by assessment of their running ability may provide means to reduce hare mortality during courses further. Our findings support the efficacy of measures taken to mitigate the impact of coursing on individual hares. However, it is necessary to evaluate the impact of removing hares from the source population and of returning coursed hares to the wild before the wider impact of coursing on wild hare populations can be determined. Article in Journal/Newspaper Lepus timidus Cambridge University Press (via Crossref) Animal Welfare 16 4 427 434
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic General Veterinary
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Animal Science and Zoology
spellingShingle General Veterinary
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Animal Science and Zoology
Reid, N
McDonald, RA
Montgomery, WI
Factors associated with hare mortality during coursing
topic_facet General Veterinary
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Animal Science and Zoology
description Abstract Hare coursing is a widespread but controversial activity. In an attempt to reduce hare mortality and mitigate the activity's impact on hare welfare, the Irish Coursing Club introduced measures including the compulsory muzzling of dogs in 1993. However, the efficacy of these measures remained the subject of heated debate. Official records, corroborated by independent video evidence, were used to assess the fate of individual Irish hares (Lepus timidus hibernicus) during coursing events from 1988-2004. Muzzling dogs significantly reduced levels of hare mortality. In courses using unmuzzled dogs from 1988/89-1992/93 mean hare mortality was 15.8%, compared to 4.1% in courses using muzzled dogs from 1993/94-2003/04. Further reductions in mortality could not be accounted for by muzzling dogs, supporting the efficacy of other factors such as improved hare husbandry. The duration of the head start given to the hare prior to the release of the dogs significantly affected the outcome of the course. Hares that were killed had head starts of greater duration than those that were chased but survived, suggesting the former may have been slower. The selection of hares by assessment of their running ability may provide means to reduce hare mortality during courses further. Our findings support the efficacy of measures taken to mitigate the impact of coursing on individual hares. However, it is necessary to evaluate the impact of removing hares from the source population and of returning coursed hares to the wild before the wider impact of coursing on wild hare populations can be determined.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Reid, N
McDonald, RA
Montgomery, WI
author_facet Reid, N
McDonald, RA
Montgomery, WI
author_sort Reid, N
title Factors associated with hare mortality during coursing
title_short Factors associated with hare mortality during coursing
title_full Factors associated with hare mortality during coursing
title_fullStr Factors associated with hare mortality during coursing
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with hare mortality during coursing
title_sort factors associated with hare mortality during coursing
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2007
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600027366
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0962728600027366
genre Lepus timidus
genre_facet Lepus timidus
op_source Animal Welfare
volume 16, issue 4, page 427-434
ISSN 0962-7286 2054-1538
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600027366
container_title Animal Welfare
container_volume 16
container_issue 4
container_start_page 427
op_container_end_page 434
_version_ 1770272588555091968