Reproduction of Antarctic flowering plants

Reproductive allocation (reproductive biomass relative to vegetative biomass) and seed production were measured for samples of the two native phanerogams occurring in Antarctica. Material collected on South Georgia (subantarctic), Signy Island (northern maritime Antarctic) and Léonie Island (souther...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Author: Convey, Peter
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102096000193
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102096000193
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102096000193
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102096000193 2024-03-03T08:38:04+00:00 Reproduction of Antarctic flowering plants Convey, Peter 1996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102096000193 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102096000193 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Antarctic Science volume 8, issue 2, page 127-134 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography journal-article 1996 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102096000193 2024-02-08T08:26:31Z Reproductive allocation (reproductive biomass relative to vegetative biomass) and seed production were measured for samples of the two native phanerogams occurring in Antarctica. Material collected on South Georgia (subantarctic), Signy Island (northern maritime Antarctic) and Léonie Island (southern maritime Antarctic) allowed an initial comparison of reproduction over a wide latitudinal range. Sizes of vegetative and reproductive structures of Colobanthus quitensis were smaller in Signy Island samples than those from South Georgia or Léonie Island. This pattern was reflected in the pattern of seed production. Vegetative and reproductive structures of Deschampsia antarctica were generally similar in size at both maritime Antarctic sites, but larger at subantarctic South Georgia. Seed production was similar in each season assessed and at all three sites. In most samples of both species there were close relationships between reproductive and vegetative biomass, and seed output and reproductive biomass. Subantartic C. quitensis showed greater allocation to seed production than material from maritime Antarctic sites. D. antarctica showed the reverse pattern, with greater allocation to reproductive biomass and seed production in most samples of maritime Antarctic material, particularly those from Signy Island. Reproductive strategies do not form any specific adaptation to the Antarctic environment for these species. Reasons for the failure of other higher plants to become established in the maritime Antarctic are discussed, and it is concluded that geographical isolation is the main factor. The most important proximate factors influencing propagules which reach potential colonization sites are likely to be the short length and low temperature of the summer season in relation to the time required for establishment. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Antarctica Léonie Island Signy Island Cambridge University Press Antarctic The Antarctic Signy Island ENVELOPE(-45.595,-45.595,-60.708,-60.708) Léonie ENVELOPE(-68.350,-68.350,-67.600,-67.600) Léonie Island ENVELOPE(-68.346,-68.346,-67.602,-67.602) Antarctic Science 8 2 127 134
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
spellingShingle Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
Convey, Peter
Reproduction of Antarctic flowering plants
topic_facet Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
description Reproductive allocation (reproductive biomass relative to vegetative biomass) and seed production were measured for samples of the two native phanerogams occurring in Antarctica. Material collected on South Georgia (subantarctic), Signy Island (northern maritime Antarctic) and Léonie Island (southern maritime Antarctic) allowed an initial comparison of reproduction over a wide latitudinal range. Sizes of vegetative and reproductive structures of Colobanthus quitensis were smaller in Signy Island samples than those from South Georgia or Léonie Island. This pattern was reflected in the pattern of seed production. Vegetative and reproductive structures of Deschampsia antarctica were generally similar in size at both maritime Antarctic sites, but larger at subantarctic South Georgia. Seed production was similar in each season assessed and at all three sites. In most samples of both species there were close relationships between reproductive and vegetative biomass, and seed output and reproductive biomass. Subantartic C. quitensis showed greater allocation to seed production than material from maritime Antarctic sites. D. antarctica showed the reverse pattern, with greater allocation to reproductive biomass and seed production in most samples of maritime Antarctic material, particularly those from Signy Island. Reproductive strategies do not form any specific adaptation to the Antarctic environment for these species. Reasons for the failure of other higher plants to become established in the maritime Antarctic are discussed, and it is concluded that geographical isolation is the main factor. The most important proximate factors influencing propagules which reach potential colonization sites are likely to be the short length and low temperature of the summer season in relation to the time required for establishment.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Convey, Peter
author_facet Convey, Peter
author_sort Convey, Peter
title Reproduction of Antarctic flowering plants
title_short Reproduction of Antarctic flowering plants
title_full Reproduction of Antarctic flowering plants
title_fullStr Reproduction of Antarctic flowering plants
title_full_unstemmed Reproduction of Antarctic flowering plants
title_sort reproduction of antarctic flowering plants
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 1996
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102096000193
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102096000193
long_lat ENVELOPE(-45.595,-45.595,-60.708,-60.708)
ENVELOPE(-68.350,-68.350,-67.600,-67.600)
ENVELOPE(-68.346,-68.346,-67.602,-67.602)
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
Signy Island
Léonie
Léonie Island
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
Signy Island
Léonie
Léonie Island
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Antarctica
Léonie Island
Signy Island
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Antarctica
Léonie Island
Signy Island
op_source Antarctic Science
volume 8, issue 2, page 127-134
ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102096000193
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 8
container_issue 2
container_start_page 127
op_container_end_page 134
_version_ 1792504173300809728