National Antarctic Program responses to fieldwork sexual harassment

Abstract Sexual harassment is a common experience for women and those from other underrepresented groups in (white) male-dominated fields such as Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Women are especially vulnerable to sexual harassment during remote scientific fieldwork. To date...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Author: Nash, Meredith
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102021000432
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102021000432
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102021000432
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102021000432 2024-06-23T07:46:04+00:00 National Antarctic Program responses to fieldwork sexual harassment Nash, Meredith 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102021000432 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102021000432 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Antarctic Science volume 33, issue 5, page 560-571 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 journal-article 2021 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102021000432 2024-06-12T04:02:19Z Abstract Sexual harassment is a common experience for women and those from other underrepresented groups in (white) male-dominated fields such as Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Women are especially vulnerable to sexual harassment during remote scientific fieldwork. To date, most of the limited research on fieldwork harassment has focused on individual experiences. There is an urgent need for research on organizational approaches to fieldwork sexual harassment. This study fills this gap by examining sexual harassment prevention by National Antarctic Programs. It draws on a desktop analysis of 36 National Antarctic Program websites with a focus on the current availability and quality of sexual harassment policies and procedures in expeditioner handbooks/field manuals. Findings show that very few National Antarctic Programs make their expeditioner handbooks/field manuals publicly available ( n = 9), and even fewer mention sexual harassment in the documentation or describe how to lodge a complaint ( n = 3). This article concludes by offering some reasons as to why National Antarctic Programs may be neglecting this issue. It also provides practical recommendations for developing more substantive content in expeditioner handbooks/field manuals and for building inclusive fieldwork environments for a diverse range of expeditioners. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Cambridge University Press Antarctic Antarctic Science 33 5 560 571
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract Sexual harassment is a common experience for women and those from other underrepresented groups in (white) male-dominated fields such as Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). Women are especially vulnerable to sexual harassment during remote scientific fieldwork. To date, most of the limited research on fieldwork harassment has focused on individual experiences. There is an urgent need for research on organizational approaches to fieldwork sexual harassment. This study fills this gap by examining sexual harassment prevention by National Antarctic Programs. It draws on a desktop analysis of 36 National Antarctic Program websites with a focus on the current availability and quality of sexual harassment policies and procedures in expeditioner handbooks/field manuals. Findings show that very few National Antarctic Programs make their expeditioner handbooks/field manuals publicly available ( n = 9), and even fewer mention sexual harassment in the documentation or describe how to lodge a complaint ( n = 3). This article concludes by offering some reasons as to why National Antarctic Programs may be neglecting this issue. It also provides practical recommendations for developing more substantive content in expeditioner handbooks/field manuals and for building inclusive fieldwork environments for a diverse range of expeditioners.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Nash, Meredith
spellingShingle Nash, Meredith
National Antarctic Program responses to fieldwork sexual harassment
author_facet Nash, Meredith
author_sort Nash, Meredith
title National Antarctic Program responses to fieldwork sexual harassment
title_short National Antarctic Program responses to fieldwork sexual harassment
title_full National Antarctic Program responses to fieldwork sexual harassment
title_fullStr National Antarctic Program responses to fieldwork sexual harassment
title_full_unstemmed National Antarctic Program responses to fieldwork sexual harassment
title_sort national antarctic program responses to fieldwork sexual harassment
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102021000432
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102021000432
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
op_source Antarctic Science
volume 33, issue 5, page 560-571
ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102021000432
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 33
container_issue 5
container_start_page 560
op_container_end_page 571
_version_ 1802643784675098624