Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods?

Abstract In Antarctica, amphipods form a highly diverse group, occupy many different ecological niches and hold an important place in food webs. Here, we aimed to test whether differences in Antarctic amphipod feeding habits were reflected in their mandible morphology, and if mouthpart specializatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Authors: Michel, Loïc N., Nyssen, Fabienne L., Dauby, Patrick, Verheye, Marie
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102020000395
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102020000395
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102020000395
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102020000395 2024-09-15T17:44:01+00:00 Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods? Michel, Loïc N. Nyssen, Fabienne L. Dauby, Patrick Verheye, Marie 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102020000395 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102020000395 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Antarctic Science volume 32, issue 6, page 496-507 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 journal-article 2020 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102020000395 2024-08-21T04:04:38Z Abstract In Antarctica, amphipods form a highly diverse group, occupy many different ecological niches and hold an important place in food webs. Here, we aimed to test whether differences in Antarctic amphipod feeding habits were reflected in their mandible morphology, and if mouthpart specialization could be used to describe amphipod trophic ecology. To do so, we compared mandible morphology in nine species spanning seven families and five functional groups (grazers, suspension feeders, generalist predators, specialist predators and scavengers). Mandible morphology adequately depicted some aspects of amphipod trophic ecology, such as the trophic level at which animals feed or their degree of dietary specialization. On the other hand, links between mandible morphology and amphipod diet were seldom unambiguous or straightforward. Similar adaptations were found in distinct functional groups. Conversely, mandible morphology could vary within a single functional group, and phylogenetic effects sometimes complicated the interpretation of form-function relationships. Overall, mandible morphology on its own was generally not sufficient to precisely predict amphipod feeding strategies. However, when combined with other methods (e.g. gut contents, trophic markers), it constitutes a valuable source of information for integrative studies of amphipod ecological diversity in the Southern Ocean. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Antarctica Southern Ocean Cambridge University Press Antarctic Science 32 6 496 507
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract In Antarctica, amphipods form a highly diverse group, occupy many different ecological niches and hold an important place in food webs. Here, we aimed to test whether differences in Antarctic amphipod feeding habits were reflected in their mandible morphology, and if mouthpart specialization could be used to describe amphipod trophic ecology. To do so, we compared mandible morphology in nine species spanning seven families and five functional groups (grazers, suspension feeders, generalist predators, specialist predators and scavengers). Mandible morphology adequately depicted some aspects of amphipod trophic ecology, such as the trophic level at which animals feed or their degree of dietary specialization. On the other hand, links between mandible morphology and amphipod diet were seldom unambiguous or straightforward. Similar adaptations were found in distinct functional groups. Conversely, mandible morphology could vary within a single functional group, and phylogenetic effects sometimes complicated the interpretation of form-function relationships. Overall, mandible morphology on its own was generally not sufficient to precisely predict amphipod feeding strategies. However, when combined with other methods (e.g. gut contents, trophic markers), it constitutes a valuable source of information for integrative studies of amphipod ecological diversity in the Southern Ocean.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Michel, Loïc N.
Nyssen, Fabienne L.
Dauby, Patrick
Verheye, Marie
spellingShingle Michel, Loïc N.
Nyssen, Fabienne L.
Dauby, Patrick
Verheye, Marie
Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods?
author_facet Michel, Loïc N.
Nyssen, Fabienne L.
Dauby, Patrick
Verheye, Marie
author_sort Michel, Loïc N.
title Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods?
title_short Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods?
title_full Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods?
title_fullStr Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods?
title_full_unstemmed Can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in Antarctic amphipods?
title_sort can mandible morphology help predict feeding habits in antarctic amphipods?
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102020000395
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102020000395
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Antarctica
Southern Ocean
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Antarctica
Southern Ocean
op_source Antarctic Science
volume 32, issue 6, page 496-507
ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102020000395
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 32
container_issue 6
container_start_page 496
op_container_end_page 507
_version_ 1810491305974824960