Gone fishing: Adélie penguin site-specific foraging tactics and breeding performance

Abstract The ecological drivers underlying breeding performance are expected to differ across the geographical range of seabird species, but few studies have compared trade-offs between colonies with different local conditions. During chick-rearing (2000–01), we compared the foraging trips, diet and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Authors: Olmastroni, Silvia, Fattorini, Niccolò, Pezzo, Francesco, Focardi, Silvano
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102020000085
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102020000085
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102020000085
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102020000085 2024-03-03T08:39:27+00:00 Gone fishing: Adélie penguin site-specific foraging tactics and breeding performance Olmastroni, Silvia Fattorini, Niccolò Pezzo, Francesco Focardi, Silvano 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102020000085 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102020000085 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Antarctic Science volume 32, issue 3, page 199-209 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography journal-article 2020 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102020000085 2024-02-08T08:46:16Z Abstract The ecological drivers underlying breeding performance are expected to differ across the geographical range of seabird species, but few studies have compared trade-offs between colonies with different local conditions. During chick-rearing (2000–01), we compared the foraging trips, diet and breeding parameters of two Adélie penguin colonies in the Ross Sea, at Edmonson Point (EdPo; ~2000 breeding pairs) and Inexpressible Island (InIs; ~24 000 breeding pairs). Penguins from InIs travelled farther and performed longer feeding trips. The quantity of food brought to the nest was the same for the two colonies, but penguins from InIs brought more fish and less krill. Eggs hatched earlier at EdPo. Breeding success did not differ, but chick weight during hatching–fledging was greater at InIs. Despite worse weather conditions at InIs, the larger proportion of high-energy food brought by penguins from InIs (i.e. fish) may explain their offspring‘s better performance. In addition, the persistence of fast ice at EdPo may have led to greater energy expenditure of breeding individuals, possibly reducing chick growth. The greater intraspecific competition expected at InIs may have been reduced by longer foraging trips and/or counteracted by the more nutritious diet. Our findings reveal complex trade-offs between foraging effort and environmental constraints in determining the breeding performance of Adélie penguins. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarctic Science Inexpressible Island Ross Sea Cambridge University Press Ross Sea Edmonson Point ENVELOPE(165.133,165.133,-74.333,-74.333) Inexpressible Island ENVELOPE(163.650,163.650,-74.900,-74.900) Antarctic Science 32 3 199 209
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
spellingShingle Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
Olmastroni, Silvia
Fattorini, Niccolò
Pezzo, Francesco
Focardi, Silvano
Gone fishing: Adélie penguin site-specific foraging tactics and breeding performance
topic_facet Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
description Abstract The ecological drivers underlying breeding performance are expected to differ across the geographical range of seabird species, but few studies have compared trade-offs between colonies with different local conditions. During chick-rearing (2000–01), we compared the foraging trips, diet and breeding parameters of two Adélie penguin colonies in the Ross Sea, at Edmonson Point (EdPo; ~2000 breeding pairs) and Inexpressible Island (InIs; ~24 000 breeding pairs). Penguins from InIs travelled farther and performed longer feeding trips. The quantity of food brought to the nest was the same for the two colonies, but penguins from InIs brought more fish and less krill. Eggs hatched earlier at EdPo. Breeding success did not differ, but chick weight during hatching–fledging was greater at InIs. Despite worse weather conditions at InIs, the larger proportion of high-energy food brought by penguins from InIs (i.e. fish) may explain their offspring‘s better performance. In addition, the persistence of fast ice at EdPo may have led to greater energy expenditure of breeding individuals, possibly reducing chick growth. The greater intraspecific competition expected at InIs may have been reduced by longer foraging trips and/or counteracted by the more nutritious diet. Our findings reveal complex trade-offs between foraging effort and environmental constraints in determining the breeding performance of Adélie penguins.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Olmastroni, Silvia
Fattorini, Niccolò
Pezzo, Francesco
Focardi, Silvano
author_facet Olmastroni, Silvia
Fattorini, Niccolò
Pezzo, Francesco
Focardi, Silvano
author_sort Olmastroni, Silvia
title Gone fishing: Adélie penguin site-specific foraging tactics and breeding performance
title_short Gone fishing: Adélie penguin site-specific foraging tactics and breeding performance
title_full Gone fishing: Adélie penguin site-specific foraging tactics and breeding performance
title_fullStr Gone fishing: Adélie penguin site-specific foraging tactics and breeding performance
title_full_unstemmed Gone fishing: Adélie penguin site-specific foraging tactics and breeding performance
title_sort gone fishing: adélie penguin site-specific foraging tactics and breeding performance
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102020000085
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102020000085
long_lat ENVELOPE(165.133,165.133,-74.333,-74.333)
ENVELOPE(163.650,163.650,-74.900,-74.900)
geographic Ross Sea
Edmonson Point
Inexpressible Island
geographic_facet Ross Sea
Edmonson Point
Inexpressible Island
genre Antarctic Science
Inexpressible Island
Ross Sea
genre_facet Antarctic Science
Inexpressible Island
Ross Sea
op_source Antarctic Science
volume 32, issue 3, page 199-209
ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102020000085
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 32
container_issue 3
container_start_page 199
op_container_end_page 209
_version_ 1792495010675949568