Changed prevalence, not absence, explains toothfish status in McMurdo Sound

Abstract We comment on the conjecture by Parker et al . (2016) that Antarctic toothfish recently returned to McMurdo Sound, arguing that this species never departed. Instead, as deduced from a 40-year fishing effort, toothfish water column prevalence became markedly reduced where bottom depths are &...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Authors: Ainley, David G., Ballard, Grant, Eastman, Joseph T., Evans, Clive W., Nur, Nadav, Parkinson, Claire L.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102016000584
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102016000584
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102016000584
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102016000584 2024-10-13T14:03:17+00:00 Changed prevalence, not absence, explains toothfish status in McMurdo Sound Ainley, David G. Ballard, Grant Eastman, Joseph T. Evans, Clive W. Nur, Nadav Parkinson, Claire L. 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102016000584 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102016000584 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Antarctic Science volume 29, issue 2, page 165-171 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 journal-article 2016 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102016000584 2024-09-18T04:00:37Z Abstract We comment on the conjecture by Parker et al . (2016) that Antarctic toothfish recently returned to McMurdo Sound, arguing that this species never departed. Instead, as deduced from a 40-year fishing effort, toothfish water column prevalence became markedly reduced where bottom depths are <500 m, with research continuing to show their presence on the bottom or above the bottom where depths are deeper. We also counter arguments that toothfish departed, and remained absent, during and following a five-year presence of mega-icebergs residing near the opposite coast of Ross Island, the icebergs inhibiting or fomenting conditions that discouraged toothfish presence in the Sound. Available analyses reveal that toothfish movement into the Sound was probably not significantly affected, and additionally that neither changes in hydrography nor in primary productivity in the Sound would have been sufficient to impact toothfish presence through food web alteration. We hypothesize that the local effect of predation by seals and whales and the regional effect of a fishery targeting the largest toothfish (those neutrally buoyant and thus capable of occupying upper levels of the water column) has resulted in the remaining toothfish now being found predominantly closer to the bottom at greater depths. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Antarctic Toothfish Iceberg* McMurdo Sound Ross Island Cambridge University Press Antarctic McMurdo Sound Ross Island Antarctic Science 29 2 165 171
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract We comment on the conjecture by Parker et al . (2016) that Antarctic toothfish recently returned to McMurdo Sound, arguing that this species never departed. Instead, as deduced from a 40-year fishing effort, toothfish water column prevalence became markedly reduced where bottom depths are <500 m, with research continuing to show their presence on the bottom or above the bottom where depths are deeper. We also counter arguments that toothfish departed, and remained absent, during and following a five-year presence of mega-icebergs residing near the opposite coast of Ross Island, the icebergs inhibiting or fomenting conditions that discouraged toothfish presence in the Sound. Available analyses reveal that toothfish movement into the Sound was probably not significantly affected, and additionally that neither changes in hydrography nor in primary productivity in the Sound would have been sufficient to impact toothfish presence through food web alteration. We hypothesize that the local effect of predation by seals and whales and the regional effect of a fishery targeting the largest toothfish (those neutrally buoyant and thus capable of occupying upper levels of the water column) has resulted in the remaining toothfish now being found predominantly closer to the bottom at greater depths.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ainley, David G.
Ballard, Grant
Eastman, Joseph T.
Evans, Clive W.
Nur, Nadav
Parkinson, Claire L.
spellingShingle Ainley, David G.
Ballard, Grant
Eastman, Joseph T.
Evans, Clive W.
Nur, Nadav
Parkinson, Claire L.
Changed prevalence, not absence, explains toothfish status in McMurdo Sound
author_facet Ainley, David G.
Ballard, Grant
Eastman, Joseph T.
Evans, Clive W.
Nur, Nadav
Parkinson, Claire L.
author_sort Ainley, David G.
title Changed prevalence, not absence, explains toothfish status in McMurdo Sound
title_short Changed prevalence, not absence, explains toothfish status in McMurdo Sound
title_full Changed prevalence, not absence, explains toothfish status in McMurdo Sound
title_fullStr Changed prevalence, not absence, explains toothfish status in McMurdo Sound
title_full_unstemmed Changed prevalence, not absence, explains toothfish status in McMurdo Sound
title_sort changed prevalence, not absence, explains toothfish status in mcmurdo sound
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2016
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102016000584
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102016000584
geographic Antarctic
McMurdo Sound
Ross Island
geographic_facet Antarctic
McMurdo Sound
Ross Island
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Antarctic Toothfish
Iceberg*
McMurdo Sound
Ross Island
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Antarctic Toothfish
Iceberg*
McMurdo Sound
Ross Island
op_source Antarctic Science
volume 29, issue 2, page 165-171
ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102016000584
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 29
container_issue 2
container_start_page 165
op_container_end_page 171
_version_ 1812819718422134784