Recovery of Antarctic stream epilithon from simulated scouring events

Abstract Microbial mats are common in polar streams and often dominate benthic biomass. Climate change may be enhancing the variability of stream flows in the Antarctic, but so far studies investigating mat responses to disturbance have been limited in this region. Mat regrowth was evaluated followi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Authors: Kohler, Tyler J., Chatfield, Ethan, Gooseff, Michael N., Barrett, John E., McKnight, Diane M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102015000024
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102015000024
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102015000024
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102015000024 2024-03-03T08:38:27+00:00 Recovery of Antarctic stream epilithon from simulated scouring events Kohler, Tyler J. Chatfield, Ethan Gooseff, Michael N. Barrett, John E. McKnight, Diane M. 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102015000024 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102015000024 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Antarctic Science volume 27, issue 4, page 341-354 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography journal-article 2015 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102015000024 2024-02-08T08:33:05Z Abstract Microbial mats are common in polar streams and often dominate benthic biomass. Climate change may be enhancing the variability of stream flows in the Antarctic, but so far studies investigating mat responses to disturbance have been limited in this region. Mat regrowth was evaluated following disturbance by experimentally scouring rocks from an ephemeral McMurdo Dry Valley stream over two summers (2001–02 and 2012–13). Mats were sampled at the beginning and resampled at the end of the flow season. In 2012–13, mats were additionally resampled mid-season along with previously undisturbed controls. In 2001–02 rocks regained 47% of chlorophyll a and 40% of ash-free dry mass by the end of the summer, while in 2012–13 rocks regrew 18% and 27%, respectively. Mat stoichiometry differed between summers, and reflected differences in biomass and discharge. Oscillatoria spp. were greatest on scoured rocks and Phormidium spp. on undisturbed rocks. Small diatoms Humidophila and Fistulifera spp. increased throughout the summer in all mats, with the latter more abundant in scoured communities. Collectively, these data suggest that mats are variable intra-annually, responsive to hydrology and require multiple summers to regrow initial biomass once lost. These results will aid the interpretation of long-term data, as well as inform Antarctic Specially Managed Area protocols. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Cambridge University Press Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Science 27 4 341 354
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
spellingShingle Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
Kohler, Tyler J.
Chatfield, Ethan
Gooseff, Michael N.
Barrett, John E.
McKnight, Diane M.
Recovery of Antarctic stream epilithon from simulated scouring events
topic_facet Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
description Abstract Microbial mats are common in polar streams and often dominate benthic biomass. Climate change may be enhancing the variability of stream flows in the Antarctic, but so far studies investigating mat responses to disturbance have been limited in this region. Mat regrowth was evaluated following disturbance by experimentally scouring rocks from an ephemeral McMurdo Dry Valley stream over two summers (2001–02 and 2012–13). Mats were sampled at the beginning and resampled at the end of the flow season. In 2012–13, mats were additionally resampled mid-season along with previously undisturbed controls. In 2001–02 rocks regained 47% of chlorophyll a and 40% of ash-free dry mass by the end of the summer, while in 2012–13 rocks regrew 18% and 27%, respectively. Mat stoichiometry differed between summers, and reflected differences in biomass and discharge. Oscillatoria spp. were greatest on scoured rocks and Phormidium spp. on undisturbed rocks. Small diatoms Humidophila and Fistulifera spp. increased throughout the summer in all mats, with the latter more abundant in scoured communities. Collectively, these data suggest that mats are variable intra-annually, responsive to hydrology and require multiple summers to regrow initial biomass once lost. These results will aid the interpretation of long-term data, as well as inform Antarctic Specially Managed Area protocols.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kohler, Tyler J.
Chatfield, Ethan
Gooseff, Michael N.
Barrett, John E.
McKnight, Diane M.
author_facet Kohler, Tyler J.
Chatfield, Ethan
Gooseff, Michael N.
Barrett, John E.
McKnight, Diane M.
author_sort Kohler, Tyler J.
title Recovery of Antarctic stream epilithon from simulated scouring events
title_short Recovery of Antarctic stream epilithon from simulated scouring events
title_full Recovery of Antarctic stream epilithon from simulated scouring events
title_fullStr Recovery of Antarctic stream epilithon from simulated scouring events
title_full_unstemmed Recovery of Antarctic stream epilithon from simulated scouring events
title_sort recovery of antarctic stream epilithon from simulated scouring events
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2015
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102015000024
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102015000024
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
op_source Antarctic Science
volume 27, issue 4, page 341-354
ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102015000024
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 27
container_issue 4
container_start_page 341
op_container_end_page 354
_version_ 1792506848232865792