Bedgap: where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?

Abstract The recently published Bedmap2 datasets mark the culmination of several decades of subice and subocean Antarctic topographic surveying by many nations, but maps of the topographic data distribution show that in the global context, the Antarctic bed remains very poorly sampled. Most of the r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Author: Pritchard, Hamish D.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s095410201400025x
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S095410201400025X
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s095410201400025x
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s095410201400025x 2024-05-12T07:56:35+00:00 Bedgap: where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping? Pritchard, Hamish D. 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s095410201400025x https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S095410201400025X en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Antarctic Science volume 26, issue 6, page 742-757 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography journal-article 2014 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s095410201400025x 2024-04-18T06:53:56Z Abstract The recently published Bedmap2 datasets mark the culmination of several decades of subice and subocean Antarctic topographic surveying by many nations, but maps of the topographic data distribution show that in the global context, the Antarctic bed remains very poorly sampled. Most of the remaining large unmapped areas on Earth lie under Antarctic ice and polar surveying continues to be difficult and expensive, thus it is important to identify where future efforts should be concentrated. A survey of 75 experts in various aspects of polar science shows that a lack of adequate topographic data is an important constraint in several themes, but the data gaps and the data needs do not tend to coincide. There is strong demand for higher resolution surveying in previously visited areas, particularly in the most dynamic and most rapidly changing regions as identified by glaciologists, oceanographers, hydrologists, biologists and geomorphologists, while geologists and ice core scientists focus on the most important areas for understanding Antarctica over deeper time. The data requirements identified here could be addressed for most areas given sufficient time and funding, but the technology needed to survey the interiors of the large ice shelf cavities has only just been developed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Antarctica ice core Ice Shelf Cambridge University Press Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Science 26 6 742 757
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
spellingShingle Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
Pritchard, Hamish D.
Bedgap: where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?
topic_facet Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
description Abstract The recently published Bedmap2 datasets mark the culmination of several decades of subice and subocean Antarctic topographic surveying by many nations, but maps of the topographic data distribution show that in the global context, the Antarctic bed remains very poorly sampled. Most of the remaining large unmapped areas on Earth lie under Antarctic ice and polar surveying continues to be difficult and expensive, thus it is important to identify where future efforts should be concentrated. A survey of 75 experts in various aspects of polar science shows that a lack of adequate topographic data is an important constraint in several themes, but the data gaps and the data needs do not tend to coincide. There is strong demand for higher resolution surveying in previously visited areas, particularly in the most dynamic and most rapidly changing regions as identified by glaciologists, oceanographers, hydrologists, biologists and geomorphologists, while geologists and ice core scientists focus on the most important areas for understanding Antarctica over deeper time. The data requirements identified here could be addressed for most areas given sufficient time and funding, but the technology needed to survey the interiors of the large ice shelf cavities has only just been developed.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Pritchard, Hamish D.
author_facet Pritchard, Hamish D.
author_sort Pritchard, Hamish D.
title Bedgap: where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?
title_short Bedgap: where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?
title_full Bedgap: where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?
title_fullStr Bedgap: where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?
title_full_unstemmed Bedgap: where next for Antarctic subglacial mapping?
title_sort bedgap: where next for antarctic subglacial mapping?
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2014
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s095410201400025x
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S095410201400025X
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Antarctica
ice core
Ice Shelf
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
Antarctica
ice core
Ice Shelf
op_source Antarctic Science
volume 26, issue 6, page 742-757
ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s095410201400025x
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 26
container_issue 6
container_start_page 742
op_container_end_page 757
_version_ 1798836726695723008