Unusual signals recorded by ocean bottom seismometers in the flooded caldera of Deception Island volcano: volcanic gases or biological activity?

Abstract An ocean bottom seismometer (OBS) network was deployed for 1 month at Deception Island volcano, Antarctica, in early 2005. Although only two volcano-tectonic and three long-period events were observed, the three OBSs located > 2 km apart inside the caldera detected over 3900 events that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Authors: Bowman, Daniel C., Wilcock, William S.D.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102013000758
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102013000758
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102013000758
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102013000758 2024-03-03T08:39:18+00:00 Unusual signals recorded by ocean bottom seismometers in the flooded caldera of Deception Island volcano: volcanic gases or biological activity? Bowman, Daniel C. Wilcock, William S.D. 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102013000758 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102013000758 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Antarctic Science volume 26, issue 3, page 267-275 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography journal-article 2013 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102013000758 2024-02-08T08:44:16Z Abstract An ocean bottom seismometer (OBS) network was deployed for 1 month at Deception Island volcano, Antarctica, in early 2005. Although only two volcano-tectonic and three long-period events were observed, the three OBSs located > 2 km apart inside the caldera detected over 3900 events that could not be attributed to known volcanic or hydrothermal sources. These events are found on one instrument at a time and occur in three types. Type 1 events resemble impulsive signals from biological organisms while type 2 and type 3 events resemble long-period seismicity. The largest number of events was observed in a region of volcanic resurgence and hydrothermal venting. All three types occur together suggesting a common cause and they show evidence for a diurnal distribution. The events are most likely to be due to aquatic animals striking the sensors, but a geological source is also possible. In the first case, these signals indicate the presence of a biological community confined to the caldera. In the second case, they imply widespread hydrothermal activity in Port Foster. Future OBS experiments should bury the seismometers, include a hydrophone, deploy instruments side-by-side, or include a video camera to distinguish between biological and geological events. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Science Antarctica Deception Island Cambridge University Press Deception Island ENVELOPE(-60.633,-60.633,-62.950,-62.950) Port Foster ENVELOPE(162.967,162.967,-78.400,-78.400) Antarctic Science 26 3 267 275
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
spellingShingle Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
Bowman, Daniel C.
Wilcock, William S.D.
Unusual signals recorded by ocean bottom seismometers in the flooded caldera of Deception Island volcano: volcanic gases or biological activity?
topic_facet Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
description Abstract An ocean bottom seismometer (OBS) network was deployed for 1 month at Deception Island volcano, Antarctica, in early 2005. Although only two volcano-tectonic and three long-period events were observed, the three OBSs located > 2 km apart inside the caldera detected over 3900 events that could not be attributed to known volcanic or hydrothermal sources. These events are found on one instrument at a time and occur in three types. Type 1 events resemble impulsive signals from biological organisms while type 2 and type 3 events resemble long-period seismicity. The largest number of events was observed in a region of volcanic resurgence and hydrothermal venting. All three types occur together suggesting a common cause and they show evidence for a diurnal distribution. The events are most likely to be due to aquatic animals striking the sensors, but a geological source is also possible. In the first case, these signals indicate the presence of a biological community confined to the caldera. In the second case, they imply widespread hydrothermal activity in Port Foster. Future OBS experiments should bury the seismometers, include a hydrophone, deploy instruments side-by-side, or include a video camera to distinguish between biological and geological events.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bowman, Daniel C.
Wilcock, William S.D.
author_facet Bowman, Daniel C.
Wilcock, William S.D.
author_sort Bowman, Daniel C.
title Unusual signals recorded by ocean bottom seismometers in the flooded caldera of Deception Island volcano: volcanic gases or biological activity?
title_short Unusual signals recorded by ocean bottom seismometers in the flooded caldera of Deception Island volcano: volcanic gases or biological activity?
title_full Unusual signals recorded by ocean bottom seismometers in the flooded caldera of Deception Island volcano: volcanic gases or biological activity?
title_fullStr Unusual signals recorded by ocean bottom seismometers in the flooded caldera of Deception Island volcano: volcanic gases or biological activity?
title_full_unstemmed Unusual signals recorded by ocean bottom seismometers in the flooded caldera of Deception Island volcano: volcanic gases or biological activity?
title_sort unusual signals recorded by ocean bottom seismometers in the flooded caldera of deception island volcano: volcanic gases or biological activity?
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2013
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102013000758
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102013000758
long_lat ENVELOPE(-60.633,-60.633,-62.950,-62.950)
ENVELOPE(162.967,162.967,-78.400,-78.400)
geographic Deception Island
Port Foster
geographic_facet Deception Island
Port Foster
genre Antarc*
Antarctic Science
Antarctica
Deception Island
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic Science
Antarctica
Deception Island
op_source Antarctic Science
volume 26, issue 3, page 267-275
ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102013000758
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 26
container_issue 3
container_start_page 267
op_container_end_page 275
_version_ 1792494765966622720