Pollution and physiological variability in gentoo penguins at two rookeries with different levels of human visitation

• Published in: Antarctic Science
• Main Authors: Barbosa, Andrés, de Mas, Eva, Benzal, Jesús, Diaz, Julia Ines, Motas, Miguel, Jerez, Silvia, Pertierra, Luis, Benayas, Javier, Justel, Ana, Lauzurica, Pilar, Garcia-Peña, Francisco Javier, Serrano, Tania
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2013
• Subjects: Antarctic; Livingston Island; Hannah; Byers; Byers peninsula; Hannah Point; Antarc*; Antarctic Science; Antarctica; Gentoo penguin
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102012000739; https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102012000739

Abstract Human activity and specifically tourism has been increasing in Antarctica over the last few years. Few studies have examined the indirect effects of human visits on Antarctic penguin rookeries. This work aims to study the differences between a highly visited (Hannah Point) and a rarely visited (Devil's Point, Byers Peninsula) gentoo penguin rookery on Livingston Island. Our results suggest that potential indirect effects of human impact are observed in gentoo penguins at Hannah Point, a colony heavily visited by tourists. Penguins at Hannah Point showed a higher presence of heavy metals such as Pb and Ni and a higher number of erythrocytic nuclear abnormalities than penguins at Devil's Point. Immunological parameters showed different results depending on whether we consider the cellular response - the number of lymphocytes being higher in penguins from Hannah Point - or the humoral response - the level of immunoglobulins being higher in penguins from Devil's Point. Measurements of corticosterone levels in feathers and heterophil/lymphocyte (H/L) ratio in blood showed lower levels in the heavily visited rookery than in the rarely visited rookery. Finally, we did not detect Campylobacter jejuni , a bacteria potentially transmitted by humans in either of the populations and we did not find any difference in the prevalence of Campylobacter lari between the populations.