UV radiation - a threat to Antarctic benthic marine diatoms?

Abstract This investigation was motivated by the lack of ultraviolet radiation (UVR, 280–400 nm) studies on Antarctic benthic marine microalgae. The objective was to estimate the impact of UV-B (280–315 nm) and UV-A (315–400 nm), on photosynthetic efficiency, species composition, cell density and sp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Authors: Wulff, Angela, Zacher, Katharina, Hanelt, Dieter, Al-Handal, Adil, Wiencke, Christian
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102007000739
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102007000739
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102007000739
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102007000739 2024-09-15T17:44:23+00:00 UV radiation - a threat to Antarctic benthic marine diatoms? Wulff, Angela Zacher, Katharina Hanelt, Dieter Al-Handal, Adil Wiencke, Christian 2007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102007000739 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102007000739 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Antarctic Science volume 20, issue 1, page 13-20 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 journal-article 2007 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102007000739 2024-07-24T04:03:50Z Abstract This investigation was motivated by the lack of ultraviolet radiation (UVR, 280–400 nm) studies on Antarctic benthic marine microalgae. The objective was to estimate the impact of UV-B (280–315 nm) and UV-A (315–400 nm), on photosynthetic efficiency, species composition, cell density and specific growth rate in a semi-natural soft-bottom diatom community. In both experiments, cell density increased over time. The most frequently observed species were Navicula cancellata , Cylindrotheca closterium , Nitzschia spp., and Petroneis plagiostoma . For both experiments, a shift in species composition and a decreased photosystem II (PSII) maximum efficiency (F v /F m ) over time was observed, irrespective of treatment. UVR significantly reduced F v /F m on days 3 and 10 (Expt 1), disappearing on the last sampling date. A similar trend was found in Expt 2. A significant UV effect on cell density was observed in Expt 1 (day 10) but not in Expt 2. No treatment effects on species composition or specific growth rate were found. Thus, the UV effects were transient (photosynthetic efficiency and cell density) and the growth of the benthic diatoms was generally unaffected. Overall, according to our results, UVR does not seem to be a threat to benthic marine Antarctic diatoms. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Cambridge University Press Antarctic Science 20 1 13 20
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
description Abstract This investigation was motivated by the lack of ultraviolet radiation (UVR, 280–400 nm) studies on Antarctic benthic marine microalgae. The objective was to estimate the impact of UV-B (280–315 nm) and UV-A (315–400 nm), on photosynthetic efficiency, species composition, cell density and specific growth rate in a semi-natural soft-bottom diatom community. In both experiments, cell density increased over time. The most frequently observed species were Navicula cancellata , Cylindrotheca closterium , Nitzschia spp., and Petroneis plagiostoma . For both experiments, a shift in species composition and a decreased photosystem II (PSII) maximum efficiency (F v /F m ) over time was observed, irrespective of treatment. UVR significantly reduced F v /F m on days 3 and 10 (Expt 1), disappearing on the last sampling date. A similar trend was found in Expt 2. A significant UV effect on cell density was observed in Expt 1 (day 10) but not in Expt 2. No treatment effects on species composition or specific growth rate were found. Thus, the UV effects were transient (photosynthetic efficiency and cell density) and the growth of the benthic diatoms was generally unaffected. Overall, according to our results, UVR does not seem to be a threat to benthic marine Antarctic diatoms.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Wulff, Angela
Zacher, Katharina
Hanelt, Dieter
Al-Handal, Adil
Wiencke, Christian
spellingShingle Wulff, Angela
Zacher, Katharina
Hanelt, Dieter
Al-Handal, Adil
Wiencke, Christian
UV radiation - a threat to Antarctic benthic marine diatoms?
author_facet Wulff, Angela
Zacher, Katharina
Hanelt, Dieter
Al-Handal, Adil
Wiencke, Christian
author_sort Wulff, Angela
title UV radiation - a threat to Antarctic benthic marine diatoms?
title_short UV radiation - a threat to Antarctic benthic marine diatoms?
title_full UV radiation - a threat to Antarctic benthic marine diatoms?
title_fullStr UV radiation - a threat to Antarctic benthic marine diatoms?
title_full_unstemmed UV radiation - a threat to Antarctic benthic marine diatoms?
title_sort uv radiation - a threat to antarctic benthic marine diatoms?
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2007
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102007000739
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102007000739
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
op_source Antarctic Science
volume 20, issue 1, page 13-20
ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102007000739
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 20
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
op_container_end_page 20
_version_ 1810491911310409728