Chick-rearing Crozet shags ( Phalacrocorax melanogenis) display sex-specific foraging behaviour

We compared, for the first time the foraging ecology of both sexes of the blue-eyed Crozet shag ( Phalacrocorax melanogenis ), using ventrally attached time depth recorders to investigate differences in time-budget and diving behaviour between the sexes during the chick-rearing. Males were the only...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Authors: Cook, Timothée R., Cherel, Yves, Bost, Charles-André, Tremblay, Yann
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102007000089
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102007000089
_version_ 1829944764061974528
author Cook, Timothée R.
Cherel, Yves
Bost, Charles-André
Tremblay, Yann
author_facet Cook, Timothée R.
Cherel, Yves
Bost, Charles-André
Tremblay, Yann
author_sort Cook, Timothée R.
collection Cambridge University Press
container_issue 1
container_start_page 55
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 19
description We compared, for the first time the foraging ecology of both sexes of the blue-eyed Crozet shag ( Phalacrocorax melanogenis ), using ventrally attached time depth recorders to investigate differences in time-budget and diving behaviour between the sexes during the chick-rearing. Males were the only ones to dive over 55 m. Females dived mostly between 15 and 35 m, a zone poorly used by males. Females foraged mostly in the morning and males in the afternoon. Females also spent one hour longer diving per day compared to males. There were differences in diving strategies and diet, indicating that both sexes targeted essentially the same prey, but of different sizes, males specializing in bigger fish. Although the relationship between sexual dimorphism and diving depth was positive (larger animals diving deeper), evidence suggests that body size (in terms of oxygen storage capacity) is not sufficient to explain so many differences in foraging ecology. Instead, we propose prey size (possibly driven by a limitation of prey handling ability in relation to beak size) could be an essential factor in shaping the male/female behavioural segregation in the Crozet shag; future studies should concentrate on this particular aspect.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Antarctic Science
genre_facet Antarctic Science
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102007000089
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
op_container_end_page 63
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102007000089
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_source Antarctic Science
volume 19, issue 1, page 55-63
ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079
publishDate 2007
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102007000089 2025-04-20T14:27:20+00:00 Chick-rearing Crozet shags ( Phalacrocorax melanogenis) display sex-specific foraging behaviour Cook, Timothée R. Cherel, Yves Bost, Charles-André Tremblay, Yann 2007 https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102007000089 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102007000089 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Antarctic Science volume 19, issue 1, page 55-63 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 journal-article 2007 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102007000089 2025-04-08T13:50:52Z We compared, for the first time the foraging ecology of both sexes of the blue-eyed Crozet shag ( Phalacrocorax melanogenis ), using ventrally attached time depth recorders to investigate differences in time-budget and diving behaviour between the sexes during the chick-rearing. Males were the only ones to dive over 55 m. Females dived mostly between 15 and 35 m, a zone poorly used by males. Females foraged mostly in the morning and males in the afternoon. Females also spent one hour longer diving per day compared to males. There were differences in diving strategies and diet, indicating that both sexes targeted essentially the same prey, but of different sizes, males specializing in bigger fish. Although the relationship between sexual dimorphism and diving depth was positive (larger animals diving deeper), evidence suggests that body size (in terms of oxygen storage capacity) is not sufficient to explain so many differences in foraging ecology. Instead, we propose prey size (possibly driven by a limitation of prey handling ability in relation to beak size) could be an essential factor in shaping the male/female behavioural segregation in the Crozet shag; future studies should concentrate on this particular aspect. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarctic Science Cambridge University Press Antarctic Science 19 1 55 63
spellingShingle Cook, Timothée R.
Cherel, Yves
Bost, Charles-André
Tremblay, Yann
Chick-rearing Crozet shags ( Phalacrocorax melanogenis) display sex-specific foraging behaviour
title Chick-rearing Crozet shags ( Phalacrocorax melanogenis) display sex-specific foraging behaviour
title_full Chick-rearing Crozet shags ( Phalacrocorax melanogenis) display sex-specific foraging behaviour
title_fullStr Chick-rearing Crozet shags ( Phalacrocorax melanogenis) display sex-specific foraging behaviour
title_full_unstemmed Chick-rearing Crozet shags ( Phalacrocorax melanogenis) display sex-specific foraging behaviour
title_short Chick-rearing Crozet shags ( Phalacrocorax melanogenis) display sex-specific foraging behaviour
title_sort chick-rearing crozet shags ( phalacrocorax melanogenis) display sex-specific foraging behaviour
url https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102007000089
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102007000089