Questioning orthodoxy
Recently hearing Fred Singer from the USA lecture on what he perceives to be the uncritical ways in which global change has been attributed to anthropogenic effects reminded me of the importance we should attach to those who question our current beliefs. For Fred it was not sufficient that the IPCC...
Published in: | Antarctic Science |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
2005
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102005002531 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102005002531 |
id |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102005002531 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102005002531 2024-03-03T08:37:42+00:00 Questioning orthodoxy WALTON, DAVID 2005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102005002531 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102005002531 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Antarctic Science volume 17, issue 1, page 1-1 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography journal-article 2005 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102005002531 2024-02-08T08:45:06Z Recently hearing Fred Singer from the USA lecture on what he perceives to be the uncritical ways in which global change has been attributed to anthropogenic effects reminded me of the importance we should attach to those who question our current beliefs. For Fred it was not sufficient that the IPCC had engaged many of the best scientific brains in the world to reach the existing consensus; they might all be wrong because the original question or assumption was wrong. Fred was strongly challenged by the audience of Antarctic scientists, not least because some of his quotations were selective in order to initiate discussion. And we know that there are areas of considerable weakness amongst the several proxies used to compute the rate of temperature change, that we have only poorly quantified and modelled the role of clouds, energy transfer between the oceans and atmosphere, water vapour as a greenhouse gas and that we have yet to be certain that the Global Climate Models really do have all the most significant driving variables. So the IPCC conclusions are drawn on the best available evidence with complementary patterns derived from several different approaches and constitute the best we can do at the moment. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Cambridge University Press Antarctic Antarctic Science 17 1 1 1 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Cambridge University Press |
op_collection_id |
crcambridgeupr |
language |
English |
topic |
Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography |
spellingShingle |
Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography WALTON, DAVID Questioning orthodoxy |
topic_facet |
Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography |
description |
Recently hearing Fred Singer from the USA lecture on what he perceives to be the uncritical ways in which global change has been attributed to anthropogenic effects reminded me of the importance we should attach to those who question our current beliefs. For Fred it was not sufficient that the IPCC had engaged many of the best scientific brains in the world to reach the existing consensus; they might all be wrong because the original question or assumption was wrong. Fred was strongly challenged by the audience of Antarctic scientists, not least because some of his quotations were selective in order to initiate discussion. And we know that there are areas of considerable weakness amongst the several proxies used to compute the rate of temperature change, that we have only poorly quantified and modelled the role of clouds, energy transfer between the oceans and atmosphere, water vapour as a greenhouse gas and that we have yet to be certain that the Global Climate Models really do have all the most significant driving variables. So the IPCC conclusions are drawn on the best available evidence with complementary patterns derived from several different approaches and constitute the best we can do at the moment. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
WALTON, DAVID |
author_facet |
WALTON, DAVID |
author_sort |
WALTON, DAVID |
title |
Questioning orthodoxy |
title_short |
Questioning orthodoxy |
title_full |
Questioning orthodoxy |
title_fullStr |
Questioning orthodoxy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Questioning orthodoxy |
title_sort |
questioning orthodoxy |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
publishDate |
2005 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102005002531 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102005002531 |
geographic |
Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science |
op_source |
Antarctic Science volume 17, issue 1, page 1-1 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 |
op_rights |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102005002531 |
container_title |
Antarctic Science |
container_volume |
17 |
container_issue |
1 |
container_start_page |
1 |
op_container_end_page |
1 |
_version_ |
1792500841332080640 |