Influence of photoperiod on visual prey detection in the Antarctic fish Notothenia neglecta

Reaction to the presence of prey, after visual stimulation, was tested in the Antarctic nototheniid fish Notothenia neglecta Nybelin under four different simulated Antarctic seasons - photoperiods of 24 hours light, 22 light/2 darkness, 12 light/12 darkness, and 24 hours darkness. Live Lepidonotothe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Authors: Donatti, Lucélia, Fanta, Edith
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000706
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102002000706
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102002000706
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102002000706 2024-03-03T08:39:18+00:00 Influence of photoperiod on visual prey detection in the Antarctic fish Notothenia neglecta Donatti, Lucélia Fanta, Edith 2002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000706 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102002000706 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Antarctic Science volume 14, issue 2, page 146-150 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography journal-article 2002 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000706 2024-02-08T08:47:17Z Reaction to the presence of prey, after visual stimulation, was tested in the Antarctic nototheniid fish Notothenia neglecta Nybelin under four different simulated Antarctic seasons - photoperiods of 24 hours light, 22 light/2 darkness, 12 light/12 darkness, and 24 hours darkness. Live Lepidonotothen nudifrons were used for visual stimulation, with exclusion of chemical and mechanical signals. The photoperiod showed significant correlation with the number of individuals stimulated and with the latency time of the first response to the presence of prey, but not with the number of attacks or pursuits. However, there were more pursuits in darkness than in light. Notothenia neglecta presumably perceive a large spectrum of wavelengths, because they had the shortest reaction time under red light, used to simulate darkness. The tests proved that N. neglecta are capable of detecting prey using only vision, in all seasons of the year, but that the optimal reactions occur in a photoperiod corresponding to the Antarctic autumn or spring. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Cambridge University Press Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Science 14 2 146 150
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
spellingShingle Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
Donatti, Lucélia
Fanta, Edith
Influence of photoperiod on visual prey detection in the Antarctic fish Notothenia neglecta
topic_facet Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
description Reaction to the presence of prey, after visual stimulation, was tested in the Antarctic nototheniid fish Notothenia neglecta Nybelin under four different simulated Antarctic seasons - photoperiods of 24 hours light, 22 light/2 darkness, 12 light/12 darkness, and 24 hours darkness. Live Lepidonotothen nudifrons were used for visual stimulation, with exclusion of chemical and mechanical signals. The photoperiod showed significant correlation with the number of individuals stimulated and with the latency time of the first response to the presence of prey, but not with the number of attacks or pursuits. However, there were more pursuits in darkness than in light. Notothenia neglecta presumably perceive a large spectrum of wavelengths, because they had the shortest reaction time under red light, used to simulate darkness. The tests proved that N. neglecta are capable of detecting prey using only vision, in all seasons of the year, but that the optimal reactions occur in a photoperiod corresponding to the Antarctic autumn or spring.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Donatti, Lucélia
Fanta, Edith
author_facet Donatti, Lucélia
Fanta, Edith
author_sort Donatti, Lucélia
title Influence of photoperiod on visual prey detection in the Antarctic fish Notothenia neglecta
title_short Influence of photoperiod on visual prey detection in the Antarctic fish Notothenia neglecta
title_full Influence of photoperiod on visual prey detection in the Antarctic fish Notothenia neglecta
title_fullStr Influence of photoperiod on visual prey detection in the Antarctic fish Notothenia neglecta
title_full_unstemmed Influence of photoperiod on visual prey detection in the Antarctic fish Notothenia neglecta
title_sort influence of photoperiod on visual prey detection in the antarctic fish notothenia neglecta
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2002
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000706
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102002000706
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
op_source Antarctic Science
volume 14, issue 2, page 146-150
ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000706
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 14
container_issue 2
container_start_page 146
op_container_end_page 150
_version_ 1792494774495739904