The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys

Marked spatial autocorrelation was encountered in an extensive data set on Antarctic seal densities as well as Antarctic pack ice characteristics. Whilst the methodology of measuring spatial autocorrelation is well developed, there is no established infrastructure for statistical inference in terms...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antarctic Science
Main Authors: Ferguson, J.W.H., Bester, M.N.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000664
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102002000664
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102002000664
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102002000664 2024-03-03T08:39:18+00:00 The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys Ferguson, J.W.H. Bester, M.N. 2002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000664 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102002000664 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Antarctic Science volume 14, issue 2, page 115-122 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography journal-article 2002 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000664 2024-02-08T08:33:50Z Marked spatial autocorrelation was encountered in an extensive data set on Antarctic seal densities as well as Antarctic pack ice characteristics. Whilst the methodology of measuring spatial autocorrelation is well developed, there is no established infrastructure for statistical inference in terms of correlation analysis or ANOVA. We survey the literature that deals with these problems, as well as some of the approaches that have been proposed for taking autocorrelation into account in inferential statistics. We apply these approaches to a data set comprising Antarctic pack ice seal counts as well as a few environmental measures. In contrast to the predictions from the existing literature, nonlinear estimation suggested that Pearson's r substantially overestimates the true correlation between seal densities and environmental variables. When compared to spatially adjusted analysis of variance, conventional ANOVA that compared seal densities or pack ice characteristics in different areas overestimated the degree of difference between these areas in proportion to the degree of spatial autocorrelation of the particular data set. In our case, the effects of spatial autocorrelation were not neutralised by treating entire transects as single points. These results emphasise the need for a methodology that takes spatial autocorrelation into account for interpreting the spatial data on Antarctic seals collected during the Antarctic pack ice seal (APIS) program. New software written for performing these analyses is available from the senior author. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Cambridge University Press Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Science 14 2 115 122
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
spellingShingle Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
Ferguson, J.W.H.
Bester, M.N.
The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys
topic_facet Geology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Oceanography
description Marked spatial autocorrelation was encountered in an extensive data set on Antarctic seal densities as well as Antarctic pack ice characteristics. Whilst the methodology of measuring spatial autocorrelation is well developed, there is no established infrastructure for statistical inference in terms of correlation analysis or ANOVA. We survey the literature that deals with these problems, as well as some of the approaches that have been proposed for taking autocorrelation into account in inferential statistics. We apply these approaches to a data set comprising Antarctic pack ice seal counts as well as a few environmental measures. In contrast to the predictions from the existing literature, nonlinear estimation suggested that Pearson's r substantially overestimates the true correlation between seal densities and environmental variables. When compared to spatially adjusted analysis of variance, conventional ANOVA that compared seal densities or pack ice characteristics in different areas overestimated the degree of difference between these areas in proportion to the degree of spatial autocorrelation of the particular data set. In our case, the effects of spatial autocorrelation were not neutralised by treating entire transects as single points. These results emphasise the need for a methodology that takes spatial autocorrelation into account for interpreting the spatial data on Antarctic seals collected during the Antarctic pack ice seal (APIS) program. New software written for performing these analyses is available from the senior author.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ferguson, J.W.H.
Bester, M.N.
author_facet Ferguson, J.W.H.
Bester, M.N.
author_sort Ferguson, J.W.H.
title The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys
title_short The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys
title_full The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys
title_fullStr The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys
title_full_unstemmed The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys
title_sort treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2002
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000664
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102002000664
geographic Antarctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Science
op_source Antarctic Science
volume 14, issue 2, page 115-122
ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000664
container_title Antarctic Science
container_volume 14
container_issue 2
container_start_page 115
op_container_end_page 122
_version_ 1792494775283220480