The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys
Marked spatial autocorrelation was encountered in an extensive data set on Antarctic seal densities as well as Antarctic pack ice characteristics. Whilst the methodology of measuring spatial autocorrelation is well developed, there is no established infrastructure for statistical inference in terms...
Published in: | Antarctic Science |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
2002
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000664 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102002000664 |
id |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102002000664 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0954102002000664 2024-03-03T08:39:18+00:00 The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys Ferguson, J.W.H. Bester, M.N. 2002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000664 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102002000664 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Antarctic Science volume 14, issue 2, page 115-122 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography journal-article 2002 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000664 2024-02-08T08:33:50Z Marked spatial autocorrelation was encountered in an extensive data set on Antarctic seal densities as well as Antarctic pack ice characteristics. Whilst the methodology of measuring spatial autocorrelation is well developed, there is no established infrastructure for statistical inference in terms of correlation analysis or ANOVA. We survey the literature that deals with these problems, as well as some of the approaches that have been proposed for taking autocorrelation into account in inferential statistics. We apply these approaches to a data set comprising Antarctic pack ice seal counts as well as a few environmental measures. In contrast to the predictions from the existing literature, nonlinear estimation suggested that Pearson's r substantially overestimates the true correlation between seal densities and environmental variables. When compared to spatially adjusted analysis of variance, conventional ANOVA that compared seal densities or pack ice characteristics in different areas overestimated the degree of difference between these areas in proportion to the degree of spatial autocorrelation of the particular data set. In our case, the effects of spatial autocorrelation were not neutralised by treating entire transects as single points. These results emphasise the need for a methodology that takes spatial autocorrelation into account for interpreting the spatial data on Antarctic seals collected during the Antarctic pack ice seal (APIS) program. New software written for performing these analyses is available from the senior author. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science Cambridge University Press Antarctic The Antarctic Antarctic Science 14 2 115 122 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Cambridge University Press |
op_collection_id |
crcambridgeupr |
language |
English |
topic |
Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography |
spellingShingle |
Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography Ferguson, J.W.H. Bester, M.N. The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys |
topic_facet |
Geology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics Oceanography |
description |
Marked spatial autocorrelation was encountered in an extensive data set on Antarctic seal densities as well as Antarctic pack ice characteristics. Whilst the methodology of measuring spatial autocorrelation is well developed, there is no established infrastructure for statistical inference in terms of correlation analysis or ANOVA. We survey the literature that deals with these problems, as well as some of the approaches that have been proposed for taking autocorrelation into account in inferential statistics. We apply these approaches to a data set comprising Antarctic pack ice seal counts as well as a few environmental measures. In contrast to the predictions from the existing literature, nonlinear estimation suggested that Pearson's r substantially overestimates the true correlation between seal densities and environmental variables. When compared to spatially adjusted analysis of variance, conventional ANOVA that compared seal densities or pack ice characteristics in different areas overestimated the degree of difference between these areas in proportion to the degree of spatial autocorrelation of the particular data set. In our case, the effects of spatial autocorrelation were not neutralised by treating entire transects as single points. These results emphasise the need for a methodology that takes spatial autocorrelation into account for interpreting the spatial data on Antarctic seals collected during the Antarctic pack ice seal (APIS) program. New software written for performing these analyses is available from the senior author. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Ferguson, J.W.H. Bester, M.N. |
author_facet |
Ferguson, J.W.H. Bester, M.N. |
author_sort |
Ferguson, J.W.H. |
title |
The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys |
title_short |
The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys |
title_full |
The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys |
title_fullStr |
The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys |
title_full_unstemmed |
The treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys |
title_sort |
treatment of spatial autocorrelation in biological surveys: the case of line transect surveys |
publisher |
Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
publishDate |
2002 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000664 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0954102002000664 |
geographic |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic The Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Science |
op_source |
Antarctic Science volume 14, issue 2, page 115-122 ISSN 0954-1020 1365-2079 |
op_rights |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954102002000664 |
container_title |
Antarctic Science |
container_volume |
14 |
container_issue |
2 |
container_start_page |
115 |
op_container_end_page |
122 |
_version_ |
1792494775283220480 |