When an interaction is both opaque and transparent: the paradox of fed counterfeeding

Opaque interactions have long been recognised as a challenge for Optimality Theory. We show that although there has been considerable effort to bring opacity into the scope of Optimality Theory, some types of process interactions are still problematic for the theory. Based on data from Tundra Nenets...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Phonology
Main Authors: Kavitskaya, Darya, Staroverov, Peter
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0952675710000126
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0952675710000126
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0952675710000126
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0952675710000126 2024-04-28T08:28:32+00:00 When an interaction is both opaque and transparent: the paradox of fed counterfeeding Kavitskaya, Darya Staroverov, Peter 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0952675710000126 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0952675710000126 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Phonology volume 27, issue 2, page 255-288 ISSN 0952-6757 1469-8188 Linguistics and Language Language and Linguistics journal-article 2010 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675710000126 2024-04-02T06:55:28Z Opaque interactions have long been recognised as a challenge for Optimality Theory. We show that although there has been considerable effort to bring opacity into the scope of Optimality Theory, some types of process interactions are still problematic for the theory. Based on data from Tundra Nenets, we present and analyse a case of fed counterfeeding in which a process A feeds a process B, and B counterfeeds A. We argue that such interactions present a challenge to Optimality Theory with Candidate Chains (OT-CC; McCarthy 2007) since the two interactions impose contradictory ranking requirements. We propose an extension of the theory that does not abandon its main assumptions and that makes fed counterfeeding analysable in OT-CC. This extension is based on the assumption that constraints can make reference to the position specified in a previous step in the derivation. Article in Journal/Newspaper nenets Tundra Cambridge University Press Phonology 27 2 255 288
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Linguistics and Language
Language and Linguistics
spellingShingle Linguistics and Language
Language and Linguistics
Kavitskaya, Darya
Staroverov, Peter
When an interaction is both opaque and transparent: the paradox of fed counterfeeding
topic_facet Linguistics and Language
Language and Linguistics
description Opaque interactions have long been recognised as a challenge for Optimality Theory. We show that although there has been considerable effort to bring opacity into the scope of Optimality Theory, some types of process interactions are still problematic for the theory. Based on data from Tundra Nenets, we present and analyse a case of fed counterfeeding in which a process A feeds a process B, and B counterfeeds A. We argue that such interactions present a challenge to Optimality Theory with Candidate Chains (OT-CC; McCarthy 2007) since the two interactions impose contradictory ranking requirements. We propose an extension of the theory that does not abandon its main assumptions and that makes fed counterfeeding analysable in OT-CC. This extension is based on the assumption that constraints can make reference to the position specified in a previous step in the derivation.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kavitskaya, Darya
Staroverov, Peter
author_facet Kavitskaya, Darya
Staroverov, Peter
author_sort Kavitskaya, Darya
title When an interaction is both opaque and transparent: the paradox of fed counterfeeding
title_short When an interaction is both opaque and transparent: the paradox of fed counterfeeding
title_full When an interaction is both opaque and transparent: the paradox of fed counterfeeding
title_fullStr When an interaction is both opaque and transparent: the paradox of fed counterfeeding
title_full_unstemmed When an interaction is both opaque and transparent: the paradox of fed counterfeeding
title_sort when an interaction is both opaque and transparent: the paradox of fed counterfeeding
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2010
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0952675710000126
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0952675710000126
genre nenets
Tundra
genre_facet nenets
Tundra
op_source Phonology
volume 27, issue 2, page 255-288
ISSN 0952-6757 1469-8188
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952675710000126
container_title Phonology
container_volume 27
container_issue 2
container_start_page 255
op_container_end_page 288
_version_ 1797587030978330624