Deep-sea and pelagic rod visual pigments identified in the mysticete whales

Abstract Our current understanding of the spectral sensitivities of the mysticete whale rod-based visual pigments is based on two species, the gray whale ( Eschrichtius robustus ) and the humpback whale ( Megaptera novaeangliae ) possessing absorbance maxima determined from difference spectra to be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Visual Neuroscience
Main Authors: BISCHOFF, NICOLE, NICKLE, BENJAMIN, CRONIN, THOMAS W., VELASQUEZ, STEPHANI, FASICK, JEFFRY I.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press (CUP) 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0952523812000107
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0952523812000107
id crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0952523812000107
record_format openpolar
spelling crcambridgeupr:10.1017/s0952523812000107 2024-05-12T08:04:58+00:00 Deep-sea and pelagic rod visual pigments identified in the mysticete whales BISCHOFF, NICOLE NICKLE, BENJAMIN CRONIN, THOMAS W. VELASQUEZ, STEPHANI FASICK, JEFFRY I. 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0952523812000107 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0952523812000107 en eng Cambridge University Press (CUP) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Visual Neuroscience volume 29, issue 2, page 95-103 ISSN 0952-5238 1469-8714 Sensory Systems Physiology journal-article 2012 crcambridgeupr https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952523812000107 2024-04-18T06:54:07Z Abstract Our current understanding of the spectral sensitivities of the mysticete whale rod-based visual pigments is based on two species, the gray whale ( Eschrichtius robustus ) and the humpback whale ( Megaptera novaeangliae ) possessing absorbance maxima determined from difference spectra to be 492 and 497 nm, respectively. These absorbance maxima values are blueshifted relative to those from typical terrestrial mammals (≈500 nm) but are redshifted when compared to those identified in the odontocetes (479–484 nm). Although these mysticete species represent two of the four mysticete families, they do not fully represent the mysticete whales in terms of foraging strategy and underwater photic environments where foraging occurs. In order to better understand the spectral sensitivities of the mysticete whale rod visual pigments, we have examined the rod opsin genes from 11 mysticete species and their associated amino acid substitutions. Based on the amino acids occurring at positions 83, 292, and 299 along with the directly determined dark spectra from expressed odontocete and mysticete rod visual pigments, we have determined that the majority of mysticete whales possess deep-sea and pelagic like rod visual pigments with absorbance maxima between 479 and 484 nm. Finally, we have defined the five amino acid substitution events that determine the resulting absorbance spectra and associated absorbance maxima for the mysticete whale rod visual pigments examined here. Article in Journal/Newspaper Humpback Whale Megaptera novaeangliae Cambridge University Press Visual Neuroscience 29 2 95 103
institution Open Polar
collection Cambridge University Press
op_collection_id crcambridgeupr
language English
topic Sensory Systems
Physiology
spellingShingle Sensory Systems
Physiology
BISCHOFF, NICOLE
NICKLE, BENJAMIN
CRONIN, THOMAS W.
VELASQUEZ, STEPHANI
FASICK, JEFFRY I.
Deep-sea and pelagic rod visual pigments identified in the mysticete whales
topic_facet Sensory Systems
Physiology
description Abstract Our current understanding of the spectral sensitivities of the mysticete whale rod-based visual pigments is based on two species, the gray whale ( Eschrichtius robustus ) and the humpback whale ( Megaptera novaeangliae ) possessing absorbance maxima determined from difference spectra to be 492 and 497 nm, respectively. These absorbance maxima values are blueshifted relative to those from typical terrestrial mammals (≈500 nm) but are redshifted when compared to those identified in the odontocetes (479–484 nm). Although these mysticete species represent two of the four mysticete families, they do not fully represent the mysticete whales in terms of foraging strategy and underwater photic environments where foraging occurs. In order to better understand the spectral sensitivities of the mysticete whale rod visual pigments, we have examined the rod opsin genes from 11 mysticete species and their associated amino acid substitutions. Based on the amino acids occurring at positions 83, 292, and 299 along with the directly determined dark spectra from expressed odontocete and mysticete rod visual pigments, we have determined that the majority of mysticete whales possess deep-sea and pelagic like rod visual pigments with absorbance maxima between 479 and 484 nm. Finally, we have defined the five amino acid substitution events that determine the resulting absorbance spectra and associated absorbance maxima for the mysticete whale rod visual pigments examined here.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author BISCHOFF, NICOLE
NICKLE, BENJAMIN
CRONIN, THOMAS W.
VELASQUEZ, STEPHANI
FASICK, JEFFRY I.
author_facet BISCHOFF, NICOLE
NICKLE, BENJAMIN
CRONIN, THOMAS W.
VELASQUEZ, STEPHANI
FASICK, JEFFRY I.
author_sort BISCHOFF, NICOLE
title Deep-sea and pelagic rod visual pigments identified in the mysticete whales
title_short Deep-sea and pelagic rod visual pigments identified in the mysticete whales
title_full Deep-sea and pelagic rod visual pigments identified in the mysticete whales
title_fullStr Deep-sea and pelagic rod visual pigments identified in the mysticete whales
title_full_unstemmed Deep-sea and pelagic rod visual pigments identified in the mysticete whales
title_sort deep-sea and pelagic rod visual pigments identified in the mysticete whales
publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
publishDate 2012
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0952523812000107
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0952523812000107
genre Humpback Whale
Megaptera novaeangliae
genre_facet Humpback Whale
Megaptera novaeangliae
op_source Visual Neuroscience
volume 29, issue 2, page 95-103
ISSN 0952-5238 1469-8714
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952523812000107
container_title Visual Neuroscience
container_volume 29
container_issue 2
container_start_page 95
op_container_end_page 103
_version_ 1798847229666000896